- Joined
- Sep 16, 2018
I thought Josh changed his last name to Potter. Did I imagine that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Campbell left the case in December and has ruled favorably to us before.Am I the only one worried for Null just on the judge? She has a very interesting background though it being sort of vague.
Marilyn Bernie "Tena" Gresky Campbell
As far as I can see, no.Did anything get put on PACER or get e-mailed to Hardin before 5 local today? I guess we'll probably have to wait until tomorrow to see due to Russ's consistent refusal to do service/certificates right.
Yet still probably the best Russell can manage.But if he loses, he's just a famous loser that SCOTUS said was stupid. That's the worst kind of fame.
The EFF has largely followed the path the ADL has lead the way on. Politics above principles, bureaucracy instead of effectiveness, left over right. While if I remember correctly they held out for a time they sold their soul some years ago. I do wonder if there are any other lesser known orgs out there, something akin to the NRA versus the smaller orgs like GOA, orgs that are still standing effectively for what's right in this domain.even the eff, which allegedly exists solely to defend "digital privacy, free speech, and innovation" was incredibly weak in its defense
You got good timing, anyone ever tell you that?Two months.
Courts literally tell you straight up, they give you the odds. You don't have to be a mathematical genius to plug those odds in. They literally say, you will win over a period of time. You understand? Pro se lawsuits are not profitable. Get it twistedWhat's the actual likely hood of this going through?
I wouldn't expect him to email anything to Hardin. After Null complained about late service (twice) due to Russ emailing his filings to Hardin only after the clerk had responded the following day saying that they'd been accepted, Russ resorted to just saying that service was made by the Court's electronic filing system.Did anything get put on PACER or get e-mailed to Hardin before 5 local today? I guess we'll probably have to wait until tomorrow to see due to Russ's consistent refusal to do service/certificates right.
It's an interesting phenomenon. People will bend, contort their morals and beliefs to an insane degree (free speech people advocating for heavy handed censorship, supporting big tech fuckery, etc) if and only IF it fucks over those dang doxin', school shootin', harassin', trans murderin' and ontologically evil kiwi farms.Maybe I'm retarded but, isn't the implication in all of this that all the Kiwi Farms enemies, who are without doubt also lip servicers of the "free (i)nternet" and against big corporations and copyright trolls, would have to choose between begrudgingly supporting Null or admit that they are big fat hypocrytes who are willing to drop all their supposed values just because they do not like the guy who is trying to defend them? How would one conciliate their religious "fuck Null and the Kiwi Farms I hope they lose forever" with "copyright trolls are evil and we must not empower them" without using literal doublethink?
I cannot imagine Russ not responding. He responds to shit that invites no response, shit that he's not even allowed to respond to and now he has a legit avenue to submit an argument to the supreme court? How can he not?Russell has 30 days to respond if he wants(he doesn't have too, but it would be funny if he does).
YesI'm going to take this as confirmation Mormons are disallowed from gambling.
Taylor Swift scores the touchdown that won the Super Bowl and submits an amicus curiae brief to SCOTUS in support of the Kiwi Farms. What a time to be alive.Has anyone informed the Swifties of this development?
The way this works on the inside is that most justices have their clerks be part of “the pool” from which petitions for cert are randomly assigned to chambers. Then the clerks in each chamber take each petition and write a memo explaining the petition and recommending what to do. That then goes out to each chamber, and the justices decide whether to grant cert or not. While they are supposed to review independently the case and come to their own conclusion, the original memo is obviously going to hold sway.
What this means is that it’s totally possible for some absolute NPC libcuck working for someone like Sotomayor to look at KF, decide the Court should do the opposite of what’s in Josh’s interest, and recommend that to the entire Court. That isn’t dispositive, but it is a structural disadvantage for Josh.
The people who cut their own dicks off absolutely do not care about values or their own rights, they care about getting a win over the dang dirty kiwi farms by any means necessarywould have to choose between begrudgingly supporting Null or admit that they are big fat hypocrytes who are willing to drop all their supposed values just because they do not like the guy who is trying to defend them?