Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.4%

  • Total voters
    464
Am I the only one worried for Null just on the judge? She has a very interesting background though it being sort of vague.

Marilyn Bernie "Tena" Gresky Campbell
Campbell left the case in December and has ruled favorably to us before.
Did anything get put on PACER or get e-mailed to Hardin before 5 local today? I guess we'll probably have to wait until tomorrow to see due to Russ's consistent refusal to do service/certificates right.
As far as I can see, no.
 
even the eff, which allegedly exists solely to defend "digital privacy, free speech, and innovation" was incredibly weak in its defense
The EFF has largely followed the path the ADL has lead the way on. Politics above principles, bureaucracy instead of effectiveness, left over right. While if I remember correctly they held out for a time they sold their soul some years ago. I do wonder if there are any other lesser known orgs out there, something akin to the NRA versus the smaller orgs like GOA, orgs that are still standing effectively for what's right in this domain.
 
What's the actual likely hood of this going through?
Courts literally tell you straight up, they give you the odds. You don't have to be a mathematical genius to plug those odds in. They literally say, you will win over a period of time. You understand? Pro se lawsuits are not profitable. Get it twisted

Gamble idiots
 
Did anything get put on PACER or get e-mailed to Hardin before 5 local today? I guess we'll probably have to wait until tomorrow to see due to Russ's consistent refusal to do service/certificates right.
I wouldn't expect him to email anything to Hardin. After Null complained about late service (twice) due to Russ emailing his filings to Hardin only after the clerk had responded the following day saying that they'd been accepted, Russ resorted to just saying that service was made by the Court's electronic filing system.

1709288310360.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe I'm retarded but, isn't the implication in all of this that all the Kiwi Farms enemies, who are without doubt also lip servicers of the "free (i)nternet" and against big corporations and copyright trolls, would have to choose between begrudgingly supporting Null or admit that they are big fat hypocrytes who are willing to drop all their supposed values just because they do not like the guy who is trying to defend them? How would one conciliate their religious "fuck Null and the Kiwi Farms I hope they lose forever" with "copyright trolls are evil and we must not empower them" without using literal doublethink?
It's an interesting phenomenon. People will bend, contort their morals and beliefs to an insane degree (free speech people advocating for heavy handed censorship, supporting big tech fuckery, etc) if and only IF it fucks over those dang doxin', school shootin', harassin', trans murderin' and ontologically evil kiwi farms.
 
Russell has 30 days to respond if he wants(he doesn't have too, but it would be funny if he does).
I cannot imagine Russ not responding. He responds to shit that invites no response, shit that he's not even allowed to respond to and now he has a legit avenue to submit an argument to the supreme court? How can he not?
 
The way this works on the inside is that most justices have their clerks be part of “the pool” from which petitions for cert are randomly assigned to chambers. Then the clerks in each chamber take each petition and write a memo explaining the petition and recommending what to do. That then goes out to each chamber, and the justices decide whether to grant cert or not. While they are supposed to review independently the case and come to their own conclusion, the original memo is obviously going to hold sway.

What this means is that it’s totally possible for some absolute NPC libcuck working for someone like Sotomayor to look at KF, decide the Court should do the opposite of what’s in Josh’s interest, and recommend that to the entire Court. That isn’t dispositive, but it is a structural disadvantage for Josh.

What you say is possible of course.

But if they choose to take the case, they are going to know the details and read Josh statement in full.

If what is written in memo does not match with the facts of the case, there is going to be a bad mood.

If this is something that happens often with a specific clerk, that clerk will have to look for a new job. Do you not think so?
 
would have to choose between begrudgingly supporting Null or admit that they are big fat hypocrytes who are willing to drop all their supposed values just because they do not like the guy who is trying to defend them?
The people who cut their own dicks off absolutely do not care about values or their own rights, they care about getting a win over the dang dirty kiwi farms by any means necessary
 
Don't tell me Russ missed another deadline. If he files nothing this week I'm going to assume his..."strategy" is to just do nothing, allow the case to be dismissed, and walk away, because the stress of dealing with the evil Kiwi Farms, which was all caused by Russ's own actions, is too much to deal with.
 
Back