Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Debbie Macomber]

Like 2/5th of the expense was just getting it bound and printed for the Court's rules. It's not cheap to file these.

So maybe Russ can't reply, unless you can Informa Pauperis the Supreme Court

 

[RodgerDodger]

I cannot imagine Russ not responding. He responds to shit that invites no response, shit that he's not even allowed to respond to and now he has a legit avenue to submit an argument to the supreme court? How can he not?

When Russ runs into a lawyer that isn't playing nice and hits him hard for his oh so many sins anf failings, he turtles. Remember the Freemantle Lawyer Lady that tore him to shreds. He stll has PTSD Plights from her. And Hardin is being a meany.

 

[Stoneheart]

i believe that this was paid for with the litigation fund. regardless, while i agree that there ought not be any errors in a petition to the ussc, the errors to which i'm referring are fairly insignificant, thus easily forgiven by the court.

Its still not acceptable even if its minor errors...
they are getting paid better than doctors and you would never be fine with a doctor making minor errors in something this important..
Why is it okay for well paid professionals to make basic mistakes when you would go balistic if the low paid illegal at the car wash makes a scratch in your car?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

So maybe Russ can't reply, unless you can Informa Pauperis the Supreme Court

Russ can reply without a lawyer and IFP, but he cannot do oral arguments without a lawyer

 

[RodgerDodger]

Russ: “I wish to be famous”

Monkey’s paw closes a finger

That happened years ago. Rush wished to be a famous celebrity. We're the fans he got.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

That happened years ago. Rush wished to be a famous celebrity. We're the fans he got.

Yeah! But that meannie doesn’t like us….

 

[Anti Snigger]

Here's a potentially dumb question, but, what's to prevent the SC clerks from just manipulating what ends up in front of the justices either for personal reasons or for the benefit of other actors?

 

[Not Really Here]

Here's a potentially dumb question, but, what's to prevent the SC clerks from just manipulating what ends up in front of the justices either for personal reasons or for the benefit of other actors?

Their supervisor, the justice they work for.

 

[StinkySnack]

Supreme Court sperging aside, it appears Russell has now definitely missed his Feb 29th deadline. I can only assume he will miss today’s as well.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

Supreme Court sperging aside, it appears Russell has now definitely missed his Feb 29th deadline. I can only assume he will miss todays’s as well.

NB4 Russ argues the Gregorian Calendar was wrong to have a leap day this year, therefore, his REAL deadline is March 1st!

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Here's a potentially dumb question, but, what's to prevent the SC clerks from just manipulating what ends up in front of the justices either for personal reasons or for the benefit of other actors?

There are nine justices, and they get to choose their clerks, and things are of public record. If even a sniff of that got around, it'd be a shit show - much more than the abortion leak.

Not saying it wouldn't happen, but damn if some fuck burned himself on "a website" it'd be even more hilarious.

I wouldn't put it past some of the justices to peruse the dockets/whatever just when bored, and partially to keep an eye out for fuckery.

 

[Your Starter for 10]

Their supervisor, the justice they work for.

In other words, literally nothing.

 

[BoomerSperg1922]

Reading through this thread, people seem to be correctly stating that the Supreme Court takes 1% of all cases submitted to them. However, I've also seen it said that a lot of the cases that get to them are last ditch criminal appeals by retards stuck in jail with too much time on their hands.

Is there anywhere you can see a list of the cases submitted to the supreme court? I'm curious how many fall under 'criminal with no case but that has nothing but spare time'. Wondering if Josh's actual chances aren't more like 5-10% after you filter all of that shit out.

 

[obsdj]

Is there anywhere you can see a list of the cases submitted to the supreme court?

Not what you asked for, but I do like to occasionally peruse the orders of the court. It can be very revealing to look at the ones shown as "order list," because that's usually several pages of PDF listing all the cases where cert was recently denied.

Most are denied without comment; occasionally there's a note that so-and-so's petition to proceed in forma pauperis was denied, etc. and occasionally a snarky notation about how so-and-so "has repeatedly abused this court's process, Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions from so-and-so unless the docketing fee is paid," etc. The SCOTUS site really is a goldmine of fun if you have the time to plow through the documents/docket searching for nuggets.

 

[Kumquat]

Reading through this thread, people seem to be correctly stating that the Supreme Court takes 1% of all cases submitted to them. However, I've also seen it said that a lot of the cases that get to them are last ditch criminal appeals by retards stuck in jail with too much time on their hands.

Is there anywhere you can see a list of the cases submitted to the supreme court? I'm curious how many fall under 'criminal with no case but that has nothing but spare time'. Wondering if Josh's actual chances aren't more like 5-10% after you filter all of that shit out.

This is something I'm curious about as well. The Supreme Court naturally only accepts important cases, so the number of accepted cases would be low regardless, but just how many people are there submitting entirely baseless petitions to the SC because they have nothing but time and money on their hands?

I want to imagine it's not a lot, since the mere act of submitting one at all can be prohibitively expensive, but then again, there's a lot of really stupid people who happen to be sitting on large sums of money, and I absolutely would not put it past those people to appeal their parking ticket to the SC based on retarded sovereign citizen logic.

 

[waffle]

Reading through this thread, people seem to be correctly stating that the Supreme Court takes 1% of all cases submitted to them. However, I've also seen it said that a lot of the cases that get to them are last ditch criminal appeals by retards stuck in jail with too much time on their hands.

Is there anywhere you can see a list of the cases submitted to the supreme court? I'm curious how many fall under 'criminal with no case but that has nothing but spare time'. Wondering if Josh's actual chances aren't more like 5-10% after you filter all of that shit out.

Because of this, I think the chance of them reminding and telling the 10th circuit to unfuck it are fairly high.

 

[Yeeted Teet]

Reading through this thread, people seem to be correctly stating that the Supreme Court takes 1% of all cases submitted to them. However, I've also seen it said that a lot of the cases that get to them are last ditch criminal appeals by retards stuck in jail with too much time on their hands.

Is there anywhere you can see a list of the cases submitted to the supreme court? I'm curious how many fall under 'criminal with no case but that has nothing but spare time'. Wondering if Josh's actual chances aren't more like 5-10% after you filter all of that shit out.

I don't have an answer to this, but while trying to look it up I discovered that they recently agreed to hear the case of Richard Glossip, an Oklahoma death row prisoner who claims to be innocent. The real murderer, and the man whose testimony got him (falsely?) convicted, is Justin Sneed.

It's a sign.

 

[WhiteNight]

Reading through this thread, people seem to be correctly stating that the Supreme Court takes 1% of all cases submitted to them. However, I've also seen it said that a lot of the cases that get to them are last ditch criminal appeals by retards stuck in jail with too much time on their hands.

I have the impression (and anyone can correct me) that there are a lot of "perennial" appellants. For example, anti-death penalty activists with a big fund of Soros money will appeal executions all over the country to the Supreme Court on frivolous procedural grounds or citing (again and again) the "cruel and unusual" clause. So, the number of submitted cases that present a legitimate issue may be a much smaller number.

I'm not saying the odds of cert are great, but I expect they're better than 1%.

 

[BoomerSperg1922]

because they have nothing but time and money on their hands?

I don't think you need money to appeal to even the supreme court if you're poor. Correct me if I'm wrong but in forma pauperis is a thing even at that level isn't it? Otherwise inmates would be unable to appeal.

 

[Thomas Talus]

I don't think you need money to appeal to even the supreme court if you're poor. Correct me if I'm wrong but in forma pauperis is a thing even at that level isn't it? Otherwise inmates would be unable to appeal.

IFP covers filing fees, but those aren't the primary drivers of legal costs.