- Joined
- Mar 19, 2016
I regret that I have but one agree sticker to give.Joss Whedon has done more damage to the practice of writing than any other person since 1990 because everyone thinks his shitty plots and snark are what make good writing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I regret that I have but one agree sticker to give.Joss Whedon has done more damage to the practice of writing than any other person since 1990 because everyone thinks his shitty plots and snark are what make good writing.
“The problem seems to be fundamentally built into the Hugos…”And now the normies know about the puppies.
I know, BELIEVE ME I KNOW the frustration with the normies finally getting there. But you gotta swallow than and suck it up because that's your only hope. If you're too much of a jerk about it, then nobody will come over to your side just to spite your annoying ass.“The problem seems to be fundamentally built into the Hugos…”
No shit sherlock.
View attachment 5764711
A lot of them seem to. I can't say for certain why that is, but in the case of vidya at least it's usually because the game is aping a fantasy property that the creators previously made.Does "space opera" SF always involve using "magic" like "psionic" powers? It's in Star Trek, Star Wars ("the Force"), StarCraft...
Does "space opera" SF always involve using "magic" such as "psionic" powers? It's in Star Trek, Star Wars ("the Force"), StarCraft...
It's mainly so common because John W. Campbell, the editor of Astounding Stories was obsessed with the idea of psychic powers so including them in your story was a surfire to get him to publish it.Does "space opera" SF always involve using "magic" such as "psionic" powers? It's in Star Trek, Star Wars ("the Force"), StarCraft...
Are you asking is Space Opera always cool? Because thats what it reads like. If so than yes.Does "space opera" SF always involve using "magic" such as "psionic" powers? It's in Star Trek, Star Wars ("the Force"), StarCraft...
I'd say "often." I can't think of an exception but there probably are a few.Does "space opera" SF always involve using "magic" such as "psionic" powers? It's in Star Trek, Star Wars ("the Force"), StarCraft...
Which is rather interesting, given that Campbell himself was "cancelled" for having a dim view of negroes. Or being a fascist. Or maybe just being a huwite man. Or something. A fat Asian woman decided she didn't like him, and that was all it took.It's mainly so common because John W. Campbell, the editor of Astounding Stories was obsessed with the idea of psychic powers so including them in your story was a surfire to get him to publish it.
I imagine his ghost is quite happy his name is no longer attached to the latest transexual manifesto published as "science fiction." In fact, I could imagine him saying, "What took you so long?"Which is rather interesting, given that Campbell himself was "cancelled" for having a dim view of negroes. Or being a fascist. Or maybe just being a huwite man. Or something. A fat Asian woman decided she didn't like him, and that was all it took.
The John W. Campbell Award is Now The Astounding Award
2) We have no reason to be confident that the current agitators will stop at the WFA bust. Indeed, the prime mover in the matter—Daniel José Older—has made his general contempt for Lovecraft quite clear, as when he called him a “terrible wordsmith.” (I suspect he would say much the same about Poe, Dunsany, Machen, and any other writers who don’t write the kind of slangy, faux-hipster style he favours.) It is quite evident that some of these agitators really don’t like Lovecraft as a writer and resent his fame and influence, and have seized on the one flaw of his racism to cast him out into the literary darkness. Vigilance needs to be maintained that the tarring of Lovecraft’s reputation doesn’t go any further.
Difference between "physics-defying Clarketech" and "ESP" is that the latter is normally -- or realistically would be -- "supernatural", while the former is still natural?Physics-defying Clarketech like FTL and subspace communications might as well be magic.
I thought "soft SF" was stuff like FTL, time travel, and "magic" ("psionics", "psychic powers") thrown in, while "hard SF" is stuff like no FTL, no backwards time travel, and certainly no "magic" use. At least that's how it's seen now. Stories by Jules Verne could be considered "hard SF" with the contemporary science (at least the moon one).Like faster than light or time travel, psychic powers seem to fall into the loose "acceptable fantasy" elements, stuff that you can put into SF and still have it be considered "hard SF."
The thing is the distinction between Hard and Soft SF is presented as a binary when it's much more of a spectrum, with no two people agreeing where the border is. There's really no single definition everyone agrees on. There's a school of thought that includes "Your story can include a fantasy element as long as you work with the ramifications."I thought "soft SF" was stuff like FTL, time travel, and "magic" ("psionics", "psychic powers") thrown in, while "hard SF" is stuff like no FTL, no backwards time travel, and certainly no "magic" use.
ESP and psionics are about raping minds. Clarke was about raping kids.Difference between "physics-defying Clarketech" and "ESP"
Depends on how you want to define space opera. Would a hard sf opera be a contradiction in terms?Does "space opera" SF always involve using "magic" such as "psionic" powers? It's in Star Trek, Star Wars ("the Force"), StarCraft...
Not really the expanse is Hard SF space opera just off the top of my head.Depends on how you want to define space opera. Would a hard sf opera be a contradiction in terms?
Difference between "physics-defying Clarketech" and "ESP" is that the latter is normally -- or realistically would be -- "supernatural", while the former is still natural?
I thought "soft SF" was stuff like FTL, time travel, and "magic" ("psionics", "psychic powers") thrown in, while "hard SF" is stuff like no FTL, no backwards time travel, and certainly no "magic" use. At least that's how it's seen now. Stories by Jules Verne could be considered "hard SF" with the contemporary science (at least the moon one).
That's ESP via machine. I meant ESP via "magic" like "psionics", which would realistically be "supernatural"*.I'd consider extra-sensory perception (once we figure out all the senses) within the possibilities of cybernetic enhancement.
Nice. Then I would nominate John C Wright's "Count to the Eschaton" series as a hard space opera.Not really the expanse is Hard SF space opera just off the top of my head.