Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Association (SFWA) - Nerds protecting nonces

And now the normies know about the puppies.
“The problem seems to be fundamentally built into the Hugos…”

No shit sherlock.

1709136413840.jpeg
 
“The problem seems to be fundamentally built into the Hugos…”

No shit sherlock.

View attachment 5764711
I know, BELIEVE ME I KNOW the frustration with the normies finally getting there. But you gotta swallow than and suck it up because that's your only hope. If you're too much of a jerk about it, then nobody will come over to your side just to spite your annoying ass.

So we suck it up. And we smile. And we say...
ff57aaa61cf734d4473e74685b4a1afe--guest-list-movie-quotes.jpg
 
Does "space opera" SF always involve using "magic" like "psionic" powers? It's in Star Trek, Star Wars ("the Force"), StarCraft...
A lot of them seem to. I can't say for certain why that is, but in the case of vidya at least it's usually because the game is aping a fantasy property that the creators previously made.
As for Star Wars it's just fantasy with spaceships so The Force is literally magic.
 
Does "space opera" SF always involve using "magic" such as "psionic" powers? It's in Star Trek, Star Wars ("the Force"), StarCraft...

That depends on the writer. Poul Anderson's Polesotechnic League/Terran Empire/Flandry novels has hints of that here and there, as does Lois McMaster Bujold's Vorkosigan Saga, but that could be an artifact of 1940s to 1980s popular culture. Physics-defying Clarketech like FTL and subspace communications might as well be magic. As long as the stories remain internally consistent and their "future" tech not too antiquated, they can still be an enjoyable read.

Then again, a more Literary work, in which the protagonist chosen to represent Humanity or Society discovers some novel aspect of the existential contradictions of being in a moldy peanut butter sandwich packed and forgotten by xir alienated partner, would probably bore me to tears.
 
Does "space opera" SF always involve using "magic" such as "psionic" powers? It's in Star Trek, Star Wars ("the Force"), StarCraft...
It's mainly so common because John W. Campbell, the editor of Astounding Stories was obsessed with the idea of psychic powers so including them in your story was a surfire to get him to publish it.
 
Does "space opera" SF always involve using "magic" such as "psionic" powers? It's in Star Trek, Star Wars ("the Force"), StarCraft...
I'd say "often." I can't think of an exception but there probably are a few.
Like faster than light or time travel, psychic powers seem to fall into the loose "acceptable fantasy" elements, stuff that you can put into SF and still have it be considered "hard SF." I'd speculate there was a period where it was considered "real" science.
 
It's mainly so common because John W. Campbell, the editor of Astounding Stories was obsessed with the idea of psychic powers so including them in your story was a surfire to get him to publish it.
Which is rather interesting, given that Campbell himself was "cancelled" for having a dim view of negroes. Or being a fascist. Or maybe just being a huwite man. Or something. A fat Asian woman decided she didn't like him, and that was all it took.

The John W. Campbell Award is Now The Astounding Award
 
Which is rather interesting, given that Campbell himself was "cancelled" for having a dim view of negroes. Or being a fascist. Or maybe just being a huwite man. Or something. A fat Asian woman decided she didn't like him, and that was all it took.

The John W. Campbell Award is Now The Astounding Award
I imagine his ghost is quite happy his name is no longer attached to the latest transexual manifesto published as "science fiction." In fact, I could imagine him saying, "What took you so long?"

They did the same thing to H.P. Lovecraft's award, of course, which lead S. T. Joshi to return his in protest.
2) We have no reason to be confident that the current agitators will stop at the WFA bust. Indeed, the prime mover in the matter—Daniel José Older—has made his general contempt for Lovecraft quite clear, as when he called him a “terrible wordsmith.” (I suspect he would say much the same about Poe, Dunsany, Machen, and any other writers who don’t write the kind of slangy, faux-hipster style he favours.) It is quite evident that some of these agitators really don’t like Lovecraft as a writer and resent his fame and influence, and have seized on the one flaw of his racism to cast him out into the literary darkness. Vigilance needs to be maintained that the tarring of Lovecraft’s reputation doesn’t go any further.
 
Physics-defying Clarketech like FTL and subspace communications might as well be magic.
Difference between "physics-defying Clarketech" and "ESP" is that the latter is normally -- or realistically would be -- "supernatural", while the former is still natural?

Like faster than light or time travel, psychic powers seem to fall into the loose "acceptable fantasy" elements, stuff that you can put into SF and still have it be considered "hard SF."
I thought "soft SF" was stuff like FTL, time travel, and "magic" ("psionics", "psychic powers") thrown in, while "hard SF" is stuff like no FTL, no backwards time travel, and certainly no "magic" use. At least that's how it's seen now. Stories by Jules Verne could be considered "hard SF" with the contemporary science (at least the moon one).
 
I thought "soft SF" was stuff like FTL, time travel, and "magic" ("psionics", "psychic powers") thrown in, while "hard SF" is stuff like no FTL, no backwards time travel, and certainly no "magic" use.
The thing is the distinction between Hard and Soft SF is presented as a binary when it's much more of a spectrum, with no two people agreeing where the border is. There's really no single definition everyone agrees on. There's a school of thought that includes "Your story can include a fantasy element as long as you work with the ramifications."
It will be interesting to see how stories set in space shake out in the near future. A story set in a fictional Antarctic base wouldn't be considered science fiction, so why is a story set on a fictional space station? Heck, Space Brothers started off as based near-future SF and now it's alternate history.
 
Depends on how you want to define space opera. Would a hard sf opera be a contradiction in terms?
Not really the expanse is Hard SF space opera just off the top of my head.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Flexo
Difference between "physics-defying Clarketech" and "ESP" is that the latter is normally -- or realistically would be -- "supernatural", while the former is still natural?

ESP and psionics generally (not always) can be written without taking on the rabbit hole of metaphysics. Paranormal adds a grab-bag of hauntings, ufology, urban legends, cryptids. Supernatural takes you the rest of the way into "low fantasy" and "urban fantasy".

I thought "soft SF" was stuff like FTL, time travel, and "magic" ("psionics", "psychic powers") thrown in, while "hard SF" is stuff like no FTL, no backwards time travel, and certainly no "magic" use. At least that's how it's seen now. Stories by Jules Verne could be considered "hard SF" with the contemporary science (at least the moon one).

I'd consider extra-sensory perception (once we figure out all the senses) within the possibilities of cybernetic enhancement. Telepathic communication has long been considered a logical extension of telecommunications development. VR and consciousness uploads could blur the lines even further.
 
Back