For years, I saw sex as a competitive sport. Then I realised how empty I felt

[editorial note: I am lolbanned from the boys' thread, so I offer this gift for them here, in the spirit of community generosity]

For years, I saw sex as a competitive sport. Then I realised how empty I felt​


Cornelia Holzbauer


I am still a proud member of the anti-slut-shaming community, but I am happier since giving up casual encounters
Mon 4 Mar 2024 09.00 GMT


Until recently, I used sexual encounters the same way others might a glass of wine after a long day, or some chocolate after a meal – before you know it, one glass can quickly turn into two or three, or a chocolate bar a day.
Having been single for almost five years, I found myself increasingly viewing sex as a competitive sport. It became a means to an end – an orgasm, a stress relief, a cure for boredom or loneliness. One time, I joked with my friends that I “masturbated with his body”, referring to my latest conquest.

I had been keenly aware of my casual approach towards sex for a while, but I didn’t see it as a problem – I was never addicted to sex and had long been a proud member of the anti-slut-shaming community. I lived by the mantra: “Singles deserve intimacy, too.”

In hindsight, it’s clear that I was confusing sex with intimacy. I thought: “Just because I am not in a relationship, doesn’t mean I don’t get to have all the sex my heart desires.” But what started as an empowered “I am different, I wear my nymphomania as a badge of honour” journey soon snowballed into saying “yes” when I should have really said “no”.
Last summer, I slept with a man with whom I had a rare, electric chemistry. But at 7am, after about four hours of sleep, he woke me rudely and asked me to leave – he told me he “couldn’t sleep” while I was there. I gathered my stuff and left, after asking him to book me an Uber. Five minutes into the ride, the driver informed me it had been cancelled. When I called the man to ask what had happened, he said I “had been cold to him” upon my departure. My jaw fell to the floor as I found myself stranded somewhere in Upper Manhattan.
Last autumn, I met a man via a dating app and slept with him on the first date. After we were done – it was already 3am – he declared that he’d have to go home now. Taken aback, I inquired why he wouldn’t just stay over and leave in the morning. His response: “Sleeping next to a woman is too intimate. I’d risk her falling in love with me.”
I can think of at least 10 more similar situations where I felt belittled, sidelined, slut-shamed or all of the above. But what haunts me the most is that I know I have done the same to some of my sexual partners in the past. My numbness led me to believe that this was normal behaviour in the jungle that is otherwise known as casual sex among singles.
My unhealthy relationship with sex came to an unceremonious end with the help of social media and a good cry. In November, inspired by the social media trend “Dating Wrapped”, where singles post slideshow presentations summing up their year of dating, I counted the number of people I had bedded in the last year – 20. I was shocked by the relatively high number, considering almost none of them had made me feel fulfilled, excited or empowered.

Many of those encounters had been so forgettable that I had trouble recalling how I felt during or after, or found myself zoning out and thinking of something else while doing the deed. I had sometimes said “yes” to sleeping with someone simply because they asked, even if I wasn’t attracted to them.



Looking back, there was no one big lightbulb moment that led me to quitting casual encounters. (That might not have worked anyway; going cold turkey after years of bingeing may lead to relapses.) But sitting at the Thanksgiving dinner table surrounded by my happily married parents and my sister, her fiance and toddler, I found myself sobbing uncontrollably. The juxtaposition between my life and theirs suddenly dawned on me: “I can’t remember the last time someone I liked held my hand or hugged me.”
I knew I needed to stop having sex with anybody other than myself – a realisation born out of pure exhaustion. I now have one rule for my current existence: I won’t sleep with anyone for whom I don’t have romantic feelings. It’s been almost four months since I had a sexual encounter (what I used to call a “dry spell”), and I am feeling cleansed. The “sugar” and “toxins” are leaving my body – or rather, my mind – and I am clear and focused. It’s a whole new world for me, and I feel excited, dedicating the time I used to spend recruiting my next lead, and later crying to my therapist, on my career instead.
Of course, there are withdrawal symptoms. They usually kick in when I encounter a sex scene in a TV show or movie, or when I witness a friend going home with someone after a night out. But I am starting to realise that sex is not a numbers game and that intimacy and sex can be entirely different things.
While my body is closed for business, my heart is open for romance.
  • Cornelia Holzbauer is a health and wellness journalist based in New York City
 
It’s so dangerous to do this - it always shocks me a bit to see women just going home with a guy she doesn’t know at all for sex. There’s enough cases in the uk alone where this has ended up with the girl killed or severely hurt to make me wonder why anyone would do it.
When you're lonely and horny and the guy is decently fun and looks good enough, it overrides danger sense for women.

I mean, it's not any different for men. What dude would turn down going home with a solid 7-8 for a bang?

The chances of it being some demented psycho are pretty fucking low.
 
When you're lonely and horny and the guy is decently fun and looks good enough, it overrides danger sense for women.

I mean, it's not any different for men. What dude would turn down going home with a solid 7-8 for a bang?

The chances of it being some demented psycho are pretty fucking low.
Makes sense, but this bird was shagging men she wasn't even into; I can only think that it's a narc thing where she wanted 'pretty' validation without realizing that there are men who'll fuck raw chicken breast if it's the right kind of shiny. Men being willing to sleep with you doesn't mean you're good company or gorgeous or whatever you might tell yourself, it means you've got a vagina and they've got an itch and the fact that you'd be proud, even for a second, over allowing yourself to be used like that is beyond tragic.

I'd feel bad for you love, you were lied to, but I'll bet you lied to impressionable young women all through your life and set them on this same path of hell too, any suffering you catch now is long overdue and thoroughly deserved.

Not worth it for, what, 20 sexual encounters a year? Pathetic. A freshly together couple that are in love can rack that up in a week easily and enjoy every single lay and get better at sex/ further bond with each one.
 
It’s so dangerous to do this - it always shocks me a bit to see women just going home with a guy she doesn’t know at all for sex. There’s enough cases in the uk alone where this has ended up with the girl killed or severely hurt to make me wonder why anyone would do it.

I know two girls who had very bad experiences like this. No serious injuries but my god it broke my fucking heart to hear them tell the story...

In both case the reason was they both had broken up with their boyfriends (the one had a boyfriend and girlfriend who were both horrible people) and weren't very emotionally stable to begin with and weren't handling their breakups very well. They decided to go out partying alone, they partied too hard and got taken advantage of.

So I imagine these girls put themselves in dangerous situations for numerous reasons (stupidity, a lack of self-concern, or just a horrible form of self-harm) and then predatory cunts pounce on them.

Well exactly. The very best outcome is going to be depressing sex with someone who gives you the clap and chucks you out at 4am.
Or you black out and wake up after the guy is done with you, or worse wake up while he's busy...
 
i can relate to this lady a lot. except i stopped being a coomer in my very early twenties, and made the change because of moral reasons. this chick just knows she's hit the wall
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: supremeautismo
Not worth it for, what, 20 sexual encounters a year? Pathetic. A freshly together couple that are in love can rack that up in a week easily and enjoy every single lay and get better at sex/ further bond with each one.
I've heard that statistics say that Married couples actually have far more sex than their unmarried counterparts, and EVEN MORE SEX than singles.

IDK, the feminist messaging I got was “don’t marry a man who won’t cook, clean, or change diapers”, the “fuck as much as possible” message wasn’t on my radar.
Depends on what feminist you're talking to, because there are absolutely "sex positive" feminists who said shit like that.
 
IDK, the feminist messaging I got was “don’t marry a man who won’t cook, clean, or change diapers”, the “fuck as much as possible” message wasn’t on my radar.

To me the heart of feminism was always sexual dimorphism is false. If you corner a feminist she will maybe drop the overt misandry, naturally off the record, in the locker room, in the ladies room they'll talk about men are scum and such. To me sexual dimorphism being false is the one uncontested factor of feminism. Women are the same as men. IMHO women are equal to men but they are not the same as men. Only a fool believes a man has the natural child raising ability a woman does only a fool believes a woman has the natural hunting skills a man has. If someone wants to assign specific value of one over the other that is their prerogative. The idea social roles are perfectly interchangeable is also very very stupid. A woman cannot act like a man without repercussions and a man cannot act like a woman without repercussions both social and internal. If feminism is teaching women can do everything men can do just as good as men; there are only two conclusions: misandry aka female superiority or man and woman are exactly the same. If you prescribe to misandry I would honestly find it more reasonable and closer to objective truth. If you prescribe to absolute similarity you walk down a weird weird road, if men and women are the same transgenderism is just a name change, single mother parenthood is exactly the same as two career parents who don't see their child as much as they should. We know these things are not true. When I was a younger man I recognized a undertone of misandry but, I assumed the core beliefs of feminism were true and net positive, at this point in my life and I don't see much value in feminism for anyone.
 
Back