- Joined
- Dec 19, 2022
It is kind of ironic how a bunch of unix-philosophy ideologues ended up creating the most bloated terminal text editor imaginable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's Wayland causing the major issues, so far as I can tell. Plasma 6 on X11 is basically 5 with some weird regressions. But yes, don't upgrade until these bugs are worked out and demand X11 at all times.So as a multi screen, NVIDIA user am I correct in thinking I should not touch Plasma 6 with a 10 ft barge pole?
I do this every few years, and every time I get excited about finally getting into emacs (and lisp) until it's edge cases start to annoy me and the fact that it really does everything but none of it well and that things just aren't as well maintained as I'd like them to be. It also only awkwardly meshes with the rest of my system. Then I realize I don't really need 90% of what emacs does and can do the remaining 10% with a bunch of macros, scripts and small, well-written programs in a much smaller editor which is a lot more "grasp-able". I like the idea of emacs, I guess. I don't know. I know I'll try it again in a few years and come to the same conclusions. This has been going on for decades at this point.Emacs the old college try again
Emacs is a virtual lisp machine, running lisp functions. If you look at it like that it really isn't a bloated editor, but really just a VM running many smaller programs on a common infrastructure. The idea isn't terrible, the thing is the linux ecosystem kind of already does that with a less obstruse language to boot.what emacs is?
Thanks. I do like Plasma so I’m hoping it all gets ironed out. Right now it just werks.It's Wayland causing the major issues, so far as I can tell. Plasma 6 on X11 is basically 5 with some weird regressions. But yes, don't upgrade until these bugs are worked out and demand X11 at all times.
Same.Thanks. I do like Plasma so I’m hoping it all gets ironed out. Right now it just werks.
The GNU project has always been very maximalist and everything they do reflects that. They want a GNU version of everything.It is kind of ironic how a bunch of unix-philosophy ideologues ended up creating the most bloated terminal text editor imaginable.
emacs is EVERYTHING you gay bastard.Call me a retard but I have never really even understood what emacs is? Is it a text editor? Is it a mini compiler? I've played around with it on various live distros but in over a decade of using Linux myself I have never come into a scenario where I needed to use/learn what it is.
It does sound like that is the design philosophy that Azure Linux is trying to do. Microsoft is trying to trim it down as much as possible with the stated goals of reducing the attack profile so it won't be as vulnerable.The minimalist community is more MIT license, suckless, plan 9, etc. They want the smallest systems they can design because they hate bloat and complexity.
I guess that's why Hurd failed.The GNU project has always been very maximalist
I'm going to laugh very hard if that means Microsoft will consider an init system for it that isn't systemd.It does sound like that is the design philosophy that Azure Linux is trying to do. Microsoft is trying to trim it down as much as possible with the stated goals of reducing the attack profile so it won't be as vulnerable.
Not going to happen. Above all they want it to be compatible with the Linux ecosystem (The Embrace portion of Embrace, Extend, Extinguish), and that means it'll be systemd based. And once they've made it systemd-based, they won't really be able to go away from it, because systemd is really nice to manage and any alternative will be grognard garbage ripped out of 90s BSD code, because the Linux community are people who want something that just works on one side (and these people are all Team Systemd), or angry nerds nobody cares about, who are only content when their script-based init requires a two week debugging session every update and their hate-mail campaign succeeded in getting the developers of their favourite tiling WM to drop the plan to implement mouse support. And if Microsoft do go full Extend and make NTinit or whatever to compete directly with Red Hat, well, isn't that a good thing? You now have a reasonable alternative to systemd.I'm going to laugh very hard if that means Microsoft will consider an init system for it that isn't systemd.
any alternative will be grognard garbage ripped out of 90s BSD code
Hey, faggot. Dinit is neither of those things and also uses a similar declarative format to systemd's for service files in a fraction of the code and overall footprint. Stop pretending once again that everything non-systemd is SysV.script-based init
I'm fond of s6 myself. I think @snov is on the mark about Microsoft's behaviour though. Azure uses RPM packaging, for example. It'll probably track Red Hat init similarly, and systemd is also the Debian+children init, so it would be very weird if they go some other way.Hey, faggot. Dinit is neither of those things
Is it possible to use Vmware with on a host with alternatives to systemD?
As long as you know your way around a .service file it shouldn't be too difficult to adapt them to whatever other init / service manager of your choice that you may have experience with. Glossing over the Arch wiki reveals it's mostly just exec'ing a few daemons, which may or may not fork and require a PID file to keep track of.Is it possible to use Vmware with on a host with alternatives to systemD?
Interesting. I might try on next installation Artix. I have to learn more about configurations though.As long as you know your way around a .service file it shouldn't be too difficult to adapt them to whatever other init / service manager of your choice that you may have experience with. Glossing over the Arch wiki reveals it's mostly just exec'ing a few daemons, which may or may not fork and require a PID file to keep track of.