Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[SpergioLeonne]

isnt brandon herrera the guy who makes AK videos on youtube
is he now involved in local politics or something?

Yes and he’s running for office

 

[Crocodylus Acutus]

He's been on his show a couple times the black guy who builds guns on air, he was razzing Rekieta not too long ago with someone else with a spinning rat avatar.

I don't know if you're joking or not, but for the sake of not confusing @DumbDude43, that's Fuddbusters, not Brandon Herrera.

 

[Tiny Chinaman]

I don't know how fake Rumble is. The reporting it does is insane as you can have ten views and a hundred likes, but how much of that is poor optimization of metrics and how much of that is fraud? Coding that kind of shit is actually rather hard at scale, and I want to say Rumble is doing alright, they're definitely growing and have some positives, but I also can't say if numbers they show are real, not because of fraud, but because of shit code.

If anything, I'd say Balldo dies before Rumble.

It would be interesting to analyze the difference in views and engagement between personalities of comparable popularity . compare the numbers and engagement for a signed personality and an unsigned personality and we wont have to speculate any longer.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

At the very least, he got a significantly weaker contract. At the very least.

Imagine interviewing at a company, having a decent resume, negotiating a wage that everyone seems content with, and then on your first day you pull out a balldo. To assuage your new supervisors’ consternation, you laugh it off and tell him “no, it’s not what you think. Look!”

You then unscrew the the tip of the balldo to reveal a little compartment, from which you retrieve a shot glass, fill it from a pocket pint, and proceed to try to get hammered before first break.

While your new supervisor is showing alarming signs of stage five apoplexy, you continue with “by the way, I saw the attendance policy in the employee handbook, but that’s not going to work for me at all. I have a life outside of this place, you know. You can expect something like 60% attendance, incel prude. I get sick a lot from drinking and drug use, and sometimes I also just don’t feel like it.”

Btw most companies I’ve worked at in manufacturing have attendance policies where if you dip to 98% attendance, you’re on warning track.

My personal record was like six years without missing a day

 

[WelperHelper99]

Imagine interviewing at a company, having a decent resume, negotiating a wage that everyone seems content with, and then on your first day you pull out a balldo. To assuage your new supervisors’ consternation, you laugh it off and tell him “no, it’s not what you think. Look!”

You then unscrew the the tip of the balldo to reveal a little compartment, from which you retrieve a shot glass, fill it from a pocket pint, and proceed to try to get hammered before first break.

While your new supervisor is showing alarming signs of stage five apoplexy, you continue with “by the way, I saw the attendance policy in the employee handbook, but that’s not going to work for me at all. I have a life outside of this place, you know. You can expect something like 60% attendance, incel prude. I get sick a lot from drinking and drug use, and sometimes I also just don’t feel like it.”

Btw most companies I’ve worked at in manufacturing have attendance policies where if you dip to 98% attendance, you’re on warning track.

Yeah, I know. Rekieta wasn't being asked much. Just stream a set amount of times a week, don't do anything freaky, and you get that fat paycheck. Rekieta said that was tyranny, shoved a bottle up his ass, put the balldo on, and now has to cope with the fact he's lost everything.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

Yeah, I know. Rekieta wasn't being asked much. Just stream a set amount of times a week, don't do anything freaky, and you get that fat paycheck. Rekieta said that was tyranny, shoved a bottle up his ass, put the balldo on, and now has to cope with the fact he's lost everything.

It’s not enough for me. He STILL goes on pathetic rants about how his dumbshit audience doesn’t understand how hard it is for someone as special as him

 

[WelperHelper99]

It’s not enough for me. He STILL goes on pathetic rants about how his dumbshit audience doesn’t understand how hard it is for someone as special as him

Sadly that's the life of a trust fund brat. Real life isn't nice, people will gossip about you if you're a asshole. Changing his attitude would do Nick wonders.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

Sadly that's the life of a trust fund brat. Real life isn't nice, people will gossip about you if you're an asshole. Changing his attitude would do Nick wonders.

I don’t think it’s possible for him to change his attitude, only to pretend to. He was slightly honest about that part; he would not do a good job pretending to understand what the rest of the world is like, where the decisions you make have to make sense or you’re done.

 

[daffodils]

I really just don't want to watch the show anymore

The good thing about current Nick is that he's very predictable: The show's going to be around 2.5 hours. The lolcow content will be in the first forty minutes, shortly before or after the mystery break, and at the end when he catches up on superchats. Anyone who skims those areas will find most of the good bits.

At this point, it might even be possible to find highlights just by looking at the preview: eyes go to the ceiling, gesticulating, the Rekieta smirk...

 

[WelperHelper99]

I don’t think it’s possible for him to change his attitude, only to pretend to. He was slightly honest about that part; he would not do a good job pretending to understand what the rest of the world is like, where the decisions you make have to make sense or you’re done.

I would say everyone can change. Not how Nick is though. He'd have to try and work at it first. And work is something he loathes.

 

[Chirping Smoke Detector]

catching the flu really threw a wrench in his plans.

That damn flu really fucked up a lot of stuff. The 5k gift, 24 hour stream, all those new interviews, his religiosity streams, the youtube creator how to vids, sober January, along with other promises he made. It's amazing how much damage that flu did.

Wasn't he on with Legal Mindset tho? I think Cuckieta is butthurt about LM to such a degree that he even hates his token nigger for collaborating with him.

He was doing Pimpcast with Mindset but I haven't seen those pop up lately. Then again, Mindset is courting the weeb audience so I doubt he has time for Drexel.

Changing his attitude would do Nick wonders.

He can only change his attitude if he stops drinking and probably takes a break from the Internet for awhile. He really needs to refocus shit.

 

[WelperHelper99]

He can only change his attitude if he stops drinking and probably takes a break from the Internet for awhile. He really needs to refocus shit.

Stopping drinking isn't happening unless he loses all his money and can't even afford tranny beer like bud light.

 

[Crocodylus Acutus]

That damn flu really fucked up a lot of stuff. The 5k gift, 24 hour stream, all those new interviews, his religiosity streams, the youtube creator how to vids, sober January, along with other promises he made. It's amazing how much damage that flu did.

If only people understood the post hoc damages that it can cause you. Hopefully now Nick will get the flu vaccine, every single vaccine past and present just to be extra safe.

 

[IDF]

I don’t think it’s possible for him to change his attitude, only to pretend to. He was slightly honest about that part; he would not do a good job pretending to understand what the rest of the world is like, where the decisions you make have to make sense or you’re done.

Can an Ethiopian change his skin or a leopard its spots?

 

[Anticipointment]

Wrong, stalker. It is only the incel prudes that dislike him. Black men seem to love him.

Was listening to some in the background at work last night, he said he wants to read the message DMs that were in the complaint in the case against P. Diddy (a sex abuse case that I believe has been settled?) but to do it he want to have the AV to the 7th woman on and/ or Lead Attorney on for the “black perspective”. He thinks that would be “a riot”.

. As he says, the point of the switchover was to move users to Rumble. As he also says, they didn't come over. He understands at least this much. He then seems to imply that they did not come over because Rumble does not have the better product, and not through anything he did or didn't do, and so wants the provision dropped now because it has failed.

Yet he also claims the rumble numbers are true like when he’d go from 3k to 10k viewers at the flip. Doesn’t tally.

 

[Spaded Dave]

“black perspective”. He thinks that would be “a riot”.

He's probably one of the most racist streamers I've personally watched but he hides it behind a weird fetishization of them. If Drex had half a brain he would have recognized this and told him to fuck off a long time ago. Unless he's just staying together for the children...if you catch my drift.

 

[IDF]

Yet he also claims the rumble numbers are true

Whys y'all so sure them numbers is fake?

 

[Spaded Dave]

Whys y'all so sure them numbers is fake?

For me it's because I had to set up a stream for the funeral of a family member. I tested it twice with unlisted streams and got something like 6 viewers and 24 viewers respectively. On the actual unlisted stream that I sent out to less than a dozen people I got like over a hundred something viewers.

The numbers for my streams were objectively fake or miscalculated. Reasonable to assume the same for Nick given the lack of engagement you see.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

Since I can't find a post since the most recent stream regarding a teenage boy hooking up with an adult woman/the South Park "Nice" episode, I offer a potential explanation why:

When an adult woman comes onto a (post-pubescent) teen boy, if the boy is not receptive and rejects the advance, he is (usually) able to physically resist, since men are stronger than women. The woman has institutional power, but the boy has physical power.

That being said, given the fact that many teen boys are so doped up on their own hormones to the point where many of them are close to "screw anything that moves" aroused for much of their conscious existence at that time in their life, I find it easy to believe a boy would say yes to a woman he's even faintly attracted to even if it's technically illegal.
I can sympathize to a degree. For me, there was at least one teacher/supervisor that I remember being in her late twenties/early thirties that I 100% would have said yes to when I was a high schooler. I bet most men look back at that time in their lives similarly. So when they see a high schooler hook up with an average to above average teacher, or a (post-pubescent) underage male actor hooking up with the older woman you see what happens in that South Park episode. They think "ah man I wish I coulda done that with that one woman when I was that age" and congratulate the kid with "Nice".

Now, contrast this to an adult man coming onto a teenage girl. If the girl is not receptive, the man can very easily physically overpower her. The man has both institutional and physical power over the girl.

You see some people talk about how women get a free pass compared to men when instances like this occur, claiming it's a huge double standard. I disagree. It's apples to oranges. Men and women are different so they're treated differently.

That was a well done post. Thank you sir.

Nick sperging about people criticising him, yelling at July or Sean or Null, or seething about his kids and Christmas, telling people gross sexual things to get a rise - none of this was funny. It inspired people to stop watching him and start shitting on him, and produce funny satirical content - but no direct action of Nick was funny.

Him telling more and more outrageous lies like getting a 107 degree fever is pretty fucking funny without input from others.

I think when it comes to Nick versus Null it's kind of an unstoppable force versus an unmovable object type of situation.

Nick was never gonna follow Null's advice to pull up. Null was never gonna put on the Balldo.

Like yourself, I don't think the two situations each are facing within their own respective forums are equivalent, but I think what the sticker notification bruhaha amply demonstrates is that Null is willing to act contrary to the wishes of a majority of the site userbase. Thus disproving Nick's assertion that Null is as malleable as Nick wants people to believe.

Put more simply, Null isn't refusing to put on the Balldo because anybody here told him not to. That's a retarded cope from Nick.

FWIW, I disagree with the decision to disable sticker notifications, but I do see a positive development here in that there is something I can now point to to show how full of shit Nick is when it comes to Null.

I feel your assessment of the situation aligns with my own held beliefs on the matter.

But just this morning, that reaction counter broke as well, at least for me.

Null scrambling the numbers might have been one of the funniest things he could have done. I'd like the notifications back, but I don't need a running tally.

Stopping drinking isn't happening unless he loses all his money and can't even afford tranny beer like bud light.

There are some VERY cheap liquors out there. He's never going to drink beer, it'd end up more expensive and he'd never get enough alcohol that way.

We'll never know when it starts, but I hope someday he drunkenly admits to filling his expensive whisky bottles with cheaper booze.

 

[Owlbear]

Whys y'all so sure them numbers is fake?

My suspicion comes from the following propositions:
1. Nick's audience is Nick's audience, and its propensity to give Nick money should be independent of which platform they are on.
2. Nick's audience gives like 10x less money per "viewer" on Rumble than on YouTube.
3. It's easy to fake views and hard to count views (including for ad revenue), but superchat dollars are hard to fake and easy to count.
4. Rumble is heavily incentivized to have high numbers.

Nick isn't the only streamer who followed this pattern. To be clear, I'm not convinced that it's outright fraud, but that counting viewers is kind of hard and that Rumble has chosen to err on the side of overcounting (by a lot) rather than investing in solving the surprisingly difficult engineering problem of getting an accurate count. I wouldn't have counted out actual fraud and paid botnets when Rumble was younger, but now I just think it's bad engineering combined with bad incentives.