Russian Special Military Operation in the Ukraine - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

[Electromagnetic Radiation]

My enemies are ontologically evil and thus any action i take against them is justified
View attachment 5792388

Russian Telegram and VK are still some of the best parts of the internet. Brazen and honest, not something you see much of elsewhere

 

[Slur Generator]

Honestly, if the self-appointed enemies of Russia declare having children to be evil, they are a self-correcting problem.

The White people of the future will have a stronger in group preference, less compassionate and will be less susceptible to propaganda.

 

[The Hardest R]

Honestly, if the self-appointed enemies of Russia declare having children to be evil, they are a self-correcting problem.

The problem is they will still try to peel away enough children to continue to propagate their agenda. If that wasn’t the case then liberalism never would’ve happened because the concept of a strong nuclear family was treated as the norm a couple generations ago and here we are now in current year plus nine.

The globohomo crowd has been pushing a narrative for decades that patriotism and nationalism of any kind is dumb and stupid and likely dangerous.

They just believe nationalism means something different.

The conventional definition is a country that prides itself on the accomplishments and strengths of their people.

The globohomo definition is a country that prides itself on the ability to accept infinite amounts of niggers.

Ukraine is good because they can’t wait until the war is done so they can accept more hostile migrants. Russia doesn’t prioritize that so therefore they are bad. A country that doesn’t prostrate themselves and yearns for more niggers is now a hostile enemy in 2024.

 

[Male Idiot]

I will derail the thread a little but, although at this point I'm starting to think that what I'm about to mention is absolutely appropriate for this thread.

Every year around this time of year I want to cry about March 16 in Latvia, but barely anyone takes it seriously, because muh freedomz, russia ebil hurr durr soviet occupiers. Coming to the literal Nazi parade and saying something about against Hitler or the Latvian SS legion itself will get you detained. Commemorating Soviet soldiers on the other hand is sus by their standards Sorry I forgot they removed the monument from Victory Park and also detain and even blatantly arrest everyone who tries to bring flowers to pay respects for Soviets. Not gonna lie, it is morbidly entertaining to watch these people do things that they condemn Russia for.

Guess who joined the parade last year. Ukrainian refugees.
View attachment 5780717

Wikipedia page covers the day pretty much accurately, and that's what truly blows my mind. Things are stated as they are, and yet, people collectively are unable to register this information whenever you call it out. If you go to the talk section, you'll see the massive amount of "well akshully tekhnikally they weren't Nazis" cope. Literally the same logic that far-gone Ukrainians use to claim there's no Nazis among them and if you come up with an example, you've falled victim to Russian propaganda.

Very interesting definitions of "freedom" among post-Soviets indeed.

Well, any place in Europe that would object is giving Bibi a blowjob.

These fools brought a tank to a shovel fight
View attachment 5781060

The oldest report on this topic was from the Russian Ministry of Defense back in 2022.
I find it strange that the paper you posted does not mention Poles and Georgians at all, who are the most numerous foreigners fighting for Ukraine
View attachment 5781059

Also, here is a Telegram channel that specializes in finding individual foreign mercenaries
https://t.me/TrackAMerc

On a related note, does anyone remember how Ukraine tried to make the Patron dog a thing?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patron_(dog)
View attachment 5781065
View attachment 5781075

And what did the Ukrainians do with the character on whose PR the government spent a lot of money for some reason? The question is rhetorical...
View attachment 5781074
View attachment 5781072
View attachment 5781073

The Furred Reich has entered the fight. It drops diaper, it is super effective.

Fucking finally, we'll have a common border with our Polish cunt friends again!
Polak, Węgier, dwa bratanki

Have you seen what the poles do recently? Why do we keep those yappy coattail riders along? We always did the heavy lifting while they sat on the couch. From turks to soviets.

Oh, you sweet summer child.

Well, yeah you can't kungfu 4 football hooligan skinheads. Sorry, that's not how it works.

You wait until they give you a weapon. Fedposting too early just gets you a gunshot wound or worse.

 

[Kuritan Deplorable]

They first appeared on the battlefield in early 2023. Amazing rate of development to reach this level so fast.

Necessity is the mother of invention. And history has shown time and time again that when results rather than the corporate 5 year plan matters, the engineers behind a lot of this stuff can make some crazy leaps. Just a shame that learning what does and doesn't work tends to come at the cost of your fellows lives.

 

[Cold Root Beer]

But how much of women being averse to direct physical confrontation stems simply from how impractical that would be? The average man is stronger than almost any woman, and that influences both genders' behaviour through puberty and beyond. If strength was equal, do you not think women would be more aggressive? If I were to attack a man over some grievance, he would probably have no problem fending me off, and if I were to attack a woman a man would step in between because he is also averse to violence, and here he has the ability to put a stop to it. Attacking someone physically isn't going to work, so because I'm not insane, I don't try. That calculation is different for a man. For him violence does have a chance to work, so it isn't always an entirely irrational choice.

Anyway a king wouldn't have personally beheaded Mary Queen of Scots either, it's a huge faux pas. A king has servants to do that sort of thing for him, and because violence is a part of their jobs, of course they're men.

>finding out that snov is a woman

First Feline, now you? If there are any more good female posters in this thread, can you please not keep it under wraps? It interferes with my generally low opinion of women on the whole, thanks.

 

[Bunkerhousing]

Someone is trying to use the sovereign citizen defence against Ukrainian recruiterss, I cannot upload the clip directly but it is posted under this post on Metorkurs past:

https://poa.st/@Jim/posts/AfbFfmqfYCsSXKoPjc

 

[The Ugly One]

Honestly, if the self-appointed enemies of Russia declare having children to be evil, they are a self-correcting problem.

Just don't let them run your schools, like we did in the USA, and they will indeed go away on their own.

Part of the reason for that is that globohomo explicitly rejects and ridicules the whole concept of national identity and patriotism. Effectively any of those sorts of ideas are considered by globohomo to be a form of nazism. Ideas of patriotism or national defense are considered laughable by those people. The ideology they teach and believe in is ruthless darwinian self-interest. In that system, anyone who even thinks of fighting for their country is a fool. The people in charge of the country really believe that in their hearts. Afghanistan and Iraq proved that out to a whole lot of people who did the actual serving in the military the hard way. Vietnam as well proved it a couple generations before.

It goes hand in hand with how modern globohomo political parties expect people to vote against their own material interests because WEF bullshit is a higher purpose that we all need to sacrifice to achieve (except the ruling class, which will get fantastically wealthy).

 

[PrimeRadiant]

Yes and no. "Globohomo nationalism" very much exists and consists of celebrating how gay, brown and GDP-rich certain countries are.
It's a doughy bugman pundit with a postgrad degree in econ celebrating the US not because it's a country with free speech and guns and endless space but because there are 10000 H1B Pajeets creating wealth by slaving away for a Silicon Valley megacorp while living like migrant day laborers and hoping to achieve the American Dream by buying a house built on some newly bulldozed piece of wilderness transformed into a cloned imitation of 60s suburbia by a developer.

It's about celebrating your country being a casino/strip mall and experiencing endless "growth" based on an immigration driven FIRE economy.
Of course nobody actually wants to die for that shit.

Their homeland is an archipelago of certain neighborhoods in certain cities and their banner is the rainbow flag. The Brahmans of Scarsdale.

 

[smartypants302]

My enemies are ontologically evil and thus any action i take against them is justified

Hes suppose to be doctoral historian and analyst of Russian culture and war propaganda. He must really suck at his job or his blatantly lying because any non-expert could easily tell that just rehashed soviet propaganda.

 

[Rubick]

Yeah I didn't see it... Whoops.

I think the BSF command staff needs to be tied to the bow of a suicide boat and launched into Odessa.

Apparently these boat drones are perfectly visible to civilian navigational radars. Some Russian civilian vessel spotted a bunch of them to the south of Crimea on 3 days ago. The captain made a report on the civilian channels about potential dangers and it was passed along to the BSF HQ. And what do you think BSF did? Fuck all.

 

[Kane Lives]

Apparently these boat drones are perfectly visible to civilian navigational radars. Some Russian civilian vessel spotted a bunch of them to the south of Crimea on 3 days ago. The captain made a report on the civilian channels about potential dangers and it was passed along to the BSF HQ. And what do you think BSF did? Fuck all.

At least it isn't the Admiral Kutnezov or something similarly valuable that sunk here lol.

If the Russians are smart, they'd take this excuse to hang BSF command by the lamppost.

 

[Rubick]

At least it isn't the Admiral Kutnezov or something similarly valuable that sunk here lol.

If the Russians are smart, they'd take this excuse to hang BSF command by the lamppost.

For MoD this hasn't gone unnoticed

BSF's CO, Sokolov has been replaced. But they are looking to replace most of the staff and retire most of the admirals which to be honest all the Russian fleets. For whatever reason with gradual decrease in ship strength the number of admirals never really decreased accordingly

 

[Kuritan Deplorable]

At least it isn't the Admiral Kutnezov or something similarly valuable that sunk here lol.

If the Russians are smart, they'd take this excuse to hang BSF command by the lamppost.

Problem is they really don't have anyone else to replace them. They've got basically three navies cuz of their geographical position, and none of them have a great mandate or significant importance since the cold war, only bits that really matter are the Nuclear Subs.

These are probably some of the best naval officers they have, they're just the cream of retarded crop.

 

[Rubick]

Problem is they really don't have anyone else to replace them. They've got basically three navies cuz of their geographical position, and none of them have a great mandate or significant importance since the cold war, only bits that really matter are the Nuclear Subs.

These are probably some of the best naval officers they have, they're just the cream of retarded crop.

Oh, they have. They have as many or close to as many admirals per fleet as in Sov era The navy has/had basically the same disease as the ground forces.

 

[geckogoy]

I have tended to maintain they should delete the surface fleet, it sucks down huge amounts of engineering resources (and money) and is not particularly effective.

 

[Rubick]

I have tended to maintain they should delete the surface force, it sucks down huge amounts of engineering resources (and money) and is not particularly effective.

And do what then ? Russia might as well have no navy at all. Because sub don't do what surface vessels do.

 

[Male Idiot]

Kuznetsov must be protected at all costs. It hosts the sharty servers, where will I get my sojaks if piggos sink it?

 

[geckogoy]

And do what then ? Russia might as well have no navy at all. Because sub don't do what surface vessels do.

The submarines are vastly more combat effective in pretty much every way, as far as sea control goes

 

[Strix454]

I have tended to maintain they should delete the surface fleet, it sucks down huge amounts of engineering resources (and money) and is not particularly effective.

The position, ships and strategy of nearly every navy in the world needs to be re-thought in the wake of whats going in Ukraine. More than just a Russian problem is going on. There are going to be questions for every country going forward about maintaining surface fleets and if they can be effectively protected.