Sweet Baby Inc. and the Steam Curator Group Conspiracy - The company that is responsible for the diarrheic video game writing.

You first ;)
Despite being a verified (former) journalist on the bird forum, you've had a "positive" standing on the Farms. Why blow up on this of all things, and why now?

One can look at this and think it's a mere single-issue sperg fit, but does it really matter to get into it with every person in this thread you disagree with solely over the fact that you disagree with them?
 
What twigs me more is the amazing tantrum and screaming fit your kind put on when excessive, gratuitous "fanservice" is cut from your games. Don't you guys know about Rule 34? Fanart? Ships? The naked video game lady of your dreams is but a click away.
It's like you can't see more than an inch in front of your face. If Hideo Kojima makes a game, I want the game he made. Not the game he made + the meddling of some sensitive retard trying to act like they know what's good for everyone else. Soccer mom mentality has ruined you.
 
OK point 1: I am an ex-Gamergate SJW journo,
There's no need to say more!
sketch1709839046154.png
 
Anytime something gets big the grifters come out of the woodwork, just enjoy the ride. The paypigs are going to simp for whatever they go on about anyway. Who knows? Maybe a brand new champion of Gamergate 2 will rise up and become a source of ridicule and joy for years to come.
What I see happening is just like with GamerGate, people will fail to ignore the red herrings. If anyone talks about SBI, it should be this.

1. SBI is a scam that encourages employees of game studios to threaten and pressure their leads into being blacklisted if they do not pay for a useless consulting service.
2. Because of this, SBI has an inordinate amount of influence for a useless consulting service. SBI has used this influence to turn many games, including many high profile triple A games, into a worse product. Potentially even leading to some of these studios shutting down.
3. SBI has actively threatened dissenters, going as far as wishing to ruin their lives and breaking the rules of certain platforms to cover up any of their wrong doings.
4. Progressive Politics are a tool not the source of the problem. SBI is first and far most a SCAM leeching off an industry. Their casus belli or underlining ideology is not as relevant as you may think.

This is especially important if you want to get (God forgive me for using this word in 2024) "normies'' on your side. Sperging out about pronouns will not do you any favors. Look what happened to HeelvsBabyface initially before getting vindicated. To a normie who is not in the know, it just looks like you are complaining about something totally irrelevant, not understanding the bigger picture. And getting heated over it makes you look like a man baby. It is best to not pull a Sargon and start debating the merits of feminism. It's not helping the original cause.

The opposite is also true. Preemptively covering your ass before, and even after, criticizing SBI will do you no favors either. For example, many of these mainline YouTubers, i.e. The Act Man, Some Ordinary Gamers, and many more, will always try to cover themselves by saying something akin to the phrase below after SBI or it's supporters make a claim with no evidence.

"Now listen, I don't support harassment or [insert any]phobia of any kind. If the steam group SBI detector is doing this, they should stop."

This is retarded and they are just hedging their bets, with the goal of being able to grift while coming out on the other side mostly unscathed. Making statements like this only gives more power to SBI that they already have plenty of. Claims like these are a red herring through and through. They are intentionally made to deviate discussion from the main problem and to muddy the waters of who is right and who is wrong. When grifters do this, it makes it sound like both sides are shitty and people will quickly disassociate.

I want to make it clear, these grifters are going to be the main enemy to anyone who supports calling out SBI and exposing all their dirty laundry. They will use your cause to milk as much attention and money for themselves and claim they are an authority on the matter. They should be put in their place any time when they try this. Not to say their support isn't helpful, but they need to know their two facing is not appreciated. They either discuss what is relevant, or get the fuck out.
 
Holding out for a hero.

(I needed to upload this locally.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhelSuCKlMs

View attachment 5792980
Deep in the bowels of a dark dank tin shack down Mexico way there is a sudden movement. The shuddering of a great Gunt rising from its filthy nest of soiled undergarments and bodily fluid drenched rags. It hears the siren call of the great war that birthed it wailing out once again. "The Age of the Ralphamale has returned baby"
 
When it's stupidly gratuitous I think it's really trashy, and it makes me look trashy playing games that visually read like softcore porn. Not all of us are that into titties that I need to see them every half-hour of gameplay. I like plenty of games with fanservice - Witcher 3 comes to mind mm Geralt... oh...or you, Snake...
Anyway, your favorite video game ship can be sexy without exposing excessive skin. Like Geralt. He gets naked and does the do, but he isn't running around Poland bareass naked for the player's visual pleasure.

What twigs me more is the amazing tantrum and screaming fit your kind put on when excessive, gratuitous "fanservice" is cut from your games. Don't you guys know about Rule 34? Fanart? Ships? The naked video game lady of your dreams is but a click away.
Cyberpunk included an option to not show your characters genitals, so its apparently fairly trivial for game studios to allow users to toggle between assets that would either provide more revealing skin/fanservice, or toggle to assets that would conceal/eliminate fanservice.... why is it hard for game journos to write articles and interview devs about adding features like this to games so people of all sensibilities can cater their game experience to their tastes instead of writing articles about female objectification, the male gaze etc... to completely eliminate shit that most people want in their games?
 
Elimination of fanservice is yet another troonstrategy, HAPAnese, chigger, shitcorean culture pushes women as whorebunnies only to later retract and try to act """"""European""""" about it, based grandpa sells the granddaughter with bunny ears, the trooned out hapamonstrosity condemns it on Vtubersphere (like it happened with that Vtuber Taiwan incident, in which shit maleism hapaculture is thrown at people's throats, because women in Asia cannot be in the spotlight, because the spotlight belongs to men) if you need to censor bodies while pushing annavarwhased anatomies like in street fighter 6, you know you are basically cattle.

It's an ouroboros of cringe, one that fucking equates Vtubers and shit like the Quarterpounder as heroes apparently.
 
I've been somewhat involved in game industry and I can safely say that even if companies like SBI will somewhow be abolished nothing in the industry will change, because 95% of game devs are already dedicated neolibs.
It is not the case where le evil company whispers bad advice to a clueless companies Wormtongue-style. No, they legit belive consulting a diversity specialists is the right thing to do and they will keep doing it and they sure won't give afuck about any consumer uprising, because there is literally nobody else besides them on the market.

The way I see it, is that there is a need for alternative gamedev scene all together. The one to challenge the current one. Another GamerGate spergout won't cut it.
 
The hows and whys of blackrock getting their nose into shit... they're purely a money driven company that uses real statistics, and ESG/DEI are bullshit. We know it, they know it. I find it more likely they want to de-value everything the hell else that isn't involved with their crap as some sort of passive smear campaign either so they can drive values down and buy it, or just tarnish public perception so much that competitors just fail.

This might be late (and is definitely gay) but I'd bet the money in my pockets against the money in yours that the ESG/DIE push by Blackrock, Vanguard, et al is just BRICS all over again.

BRICS of course being a nonsensical package of lies and contradictions created by a Goldman Sachs trader in order to bamboozle rubes (either with 401Ks or running pension funds) into buying low quality but highly profitable (for Goldman) securities.

Now instead of "Invest in China, guaranteed returns! Pinky promise!" it's "Invest responsibility! Show everyone what a morally upright holder of correct opinions you are to liberal friends!".

Same shit, different package.
 
I don't know what you coombrains want in your games, I have to make educated guesses.

Gameplay? Cohesive lore, ethnography and aesthetics leading to genuine immersion?

... but if we are talking hopes and dreams how about a game where you play as Mecha-Hitler and slaughter the Lügenpresse? That would be pretty cathartic.
 
Back