Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

[Xarpho's Return]

>you don’t solve crime rates with enforcement

That’s so spectacularly retarded I don’t even know how to respond

As you should know, the Left has completely lost their mind on crime rates and some articles have all but stated that black people are predisposed to be criminals...and that's absolutely not a box anyone wants to open.

 

[Markass the Worst]

How are Evil, Murdering Drivers supposed to be held accountable if police aren't allowed to chase them?

Wait, I know the answer. They say ban all cars, that will definitely solve crime (it won't).

 

[S.C.U.D.]

/r/fuckcars is mad that San Francisco voters gave police powers to chase criminals again:

This one really pissed me off. Just let criminals do whatever they want all the time? That's what got SF where it is today you fucking retards. You can type all of the bold, italicized text you want, that won't change reality.

 

[Aero the Alcoholic Bat]

View attachment 5794259
This one really pissed me off. Just let criminals do whatever they want all the time? That's what got SF where it is today you fucking retards. You can type all of the bold, italicized text you want, that won't change reality.

My favorite part is the naive belief that there aren't loads of people out there who just commit evil for evil's sake.

All evil people have some sob story or another, even the evil chuds, the few villains they truly consider irredeemable.

 

[DavidS877]

View attachment 5794259
This one really pissed me off. Just let criminals do whatever they want all the time? That's what got SF where it is today you fucking retards. You can type all of the bold, italicized text you want, that won't change reality.

Ok, let's say you adopt the Texas model where you can shoot someone breaking into your car at night. How are they going to re-offend? Assuming you're a good shot.

 

[Xarpho's Return]

This one really pissed me off. Just let criminals do whatever they want all the time? That's what got SF where it is today you fucking retards. You can type all of the bold, italicized text you want, that won't change reality.

I know these people are commies and awful people who deserve nothing less to be thrown out of a helicopter (in Minecraft) but it's chilling to someone talk about "more equal" in unironic terms, in the way that they'd probably nod along with the "some are more equal than others" quote from Animal Farm without batting an eye.

 

[ComStar]

How are Evil, Murdering Drivers supposed to be held accountable if police aren't allowed to chase them?

Wait, I know the answer. They say ban all cars, that will definitely solve crime (it won't).

I'm sure they will allow the police to chase people if they use bikes*.

Bikes are super safe, after all. Nobody has ever been hurt or killed by a bike, compared to the gorillion people maimed and murdered every day by Carmageddon-esque killmobiles like the one i drive**


* until their bikes get stolen that is.
** It's an old Opel, so i get that german fascist cred as well

 

[Tootsie Bear]

View attachment 5794259
This one really pissed me off. Just let criminals do whatever they want all the time? That's what got SF where it is today you fucking retards. You can type all of the bold, italicized text you want, that won't change reality.

People like this believe crime is so bad because of the police. If it wasn't for the police there would be no crime. Does that mean crime will stop if police are removed? No. But they'll fuck you over that these crimes aren't crimes and you shouldn't worry about it. It only becomes a problem until it affects those in charge. Look at Portland for example.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

People like this believe crime is so bad because of the police. If it wasn't for the police there would be no crime. Does that mean crime will stop if police are removed? No. But they'll fuck you over that these crimes aren't crimes and you shouldn't worry about it. It only becomes a problem until it affects those in charge. Look at Portland for example.

They're doing a slight of hand on you when they talk this way because they sometimes talk about "crime" and mean literally anything that can be charged by the police or civil law - this is what they want to use when they talk about "more enforcement just makes more criminals" because everyone speeds (and tickets don't do shit to stop speeding). But when people talk crime they usually mean property or violent crime caused by niggers, and locking up niggers for doing crimes DOES decrease the crimes done, because there is not an infinite supply of niggers (though they're damn trying).

 

[Major]

Jason is watching troons again:
View attachment 5791066
View attachment 5791061
Source (Archive)

Do you think he wants to fuck one?

 

[Xarpho's Return]

They're doing a slight of hand on you when they talk this way because they sometimes talk about "crime" and mean literally anything that can be charged by the police or civil law - this is what they want to use when they talk about "more enforcement just makes more criminals" because everyone speeds (and tickets don't do shit to stop speeding). But when people talk crime they usually mean property or violent crime caused by niggers, and locking up niggers for doing crimes DOES decrease the crimes done, because there is not an infinite supply of niggers (though they're damn trying).

Funny you should bring up speeding, when it comes to parking violations they go full judge, jury, and executioner, either the police better ticket them or they take the law into their own hands.

 

[Countless irate bees]

Adam Something spat out another globalist classic:

Spoiler

I really hope that whoever's paying him pays well, imagine doing this for free!

 

[teriyakiburns]

Adam Something spat out another globalist classic:

I really hope that whoever's paying him pays well, imagine doing this for free!

Adam Something craves the establishment of imperial domination over peripheral polities.

 

[Countless irate bees]

Adam Something craves the establishment of imperial domination over peripheral polities.

For a dude living at the periphery that is hungary and slovakia, he sure is confident in the western european governing skills.

 

[User names must be unique]

Adam Something spat out another globalist classic:

Hungary has like 20 seats in the EU parliament, the UK had 70+ and found that intolerable. Dudes begging France and Germany to take over his country.

 

[grump]

the concept of 'induced' demand as this special unique inherently bad thing always baffled me. Isn't it like any other demand just what the people want? If it is a bad thing why doesn't it apply to anything else? If I open up a burger shop and cause a spike in burger demand because of my groundbreaking recipes does that mean I should be shut down?

 

[Dante Alighieri]

If I open up a burger shop and cause a spike in burger demand because of my groundbreaking recipes does that mean I should be shut down?

Meat is murder, so yes

 

[Eternal Gopnik]

the concept of 'induced' demand as this special unique inherently bad thing always baffled me. Isn't it like any other demand just what the people want? If it is a bad thing why doesn't it apply to anything else? If I open up a burger shop and cause a spike in burger demand because of my groundbreaking recipes does that mean I should be shut down?

See, road traffic is special in that it has infinite demand. If the roads near me were better, I wouldn't simply use them to drive to work or wherever I need to be - I'd drive my first car to work, take a taxi back home, and drive my second car to work as well. I'd keep buying cars just to make use of every single lane of every single road. I would even travel back in time so that I could be in many cars at once.

If that sounds fucking retarded to you, it's because you are uneducated swine and I'm better than you.

 

[maxell4hd]

the concept of 'induced' demand as this special unique inherently bad thing always baffled me. Isn't it like any other demand just what the people want? If it is a bad thing why doesn't it apply to anything else? If I open up a burger shop and cause a spike in burger demand because of my groundbreaking recipes does that mean I should be shut down?

It doesn't make any sense to consider it a bad thing. If you spend significant resources on public infrastructure, then what you want is for it be used heavily. Otherwise it was a waste of money. What you don't want is to spend money and then have no one using it; like Honolulu's $9-$10B LRT line that carries a whopping 3000 riders/day. It would be cheaper to have bought every rider a new car.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/buttigieg-visits-skyline-while-0-3-of-oahu-rides-rail/ar-BB1iK4P3

But it's really just an excuse for anti-car activists to fight against any/all road infrastructure in any situation. It's not like they're going to support road spending if the roads don't induce demand, current usage is below capacity or to build so massively upfront as to have decades of excess capacity.

 

[Marvin]

Lol apparently some bike nerd sperged out at a Baltimore city transportation meeting about bike lanes and called a city councilmember (I think) a bitch.

I wonder if he's got an internet footprint.