Android Raptor wants you to know how much she hates conservative Christians for the billionth time

You just said "girls stop being children when they turn 18". How the fuck are you pretending I just said anything about under 14's?

If you refuse to use the same version of the English language that everyone else uses that's perfectly up to you, but in our version of the English language calling somebody a 'pedophile' is actually a pretty big fucking deal, and you should stop calling people it for no good reason, you unbelievably stupid fucking bitch.
I mentioned 14 because by that age a vast majority of girls have boobs.

I think calling someone a pedo for saying creepy shit akin to some of the creepy shit adults said to them as a kid isn't the worst reason to call someone a pedo.
Well gee that escalated quickly. Not speaking from experience I hope?
No, just knowledge of what goes down amongst religious extremists.

There's a reason there was a "What I Was Wearing" exhibit in Amish/plainfolk country
 
We're putting you back in the kitchen dawg, put that burqa on while you still can 😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹
9rdgdu.gif
 
I think calling someone a pedo for saying creepy shit akin to some of the shit adults said to them as a kid isn't the worst reason to call someone a pedo.
It is a terrible reason to call somebody a pedophile. Even the most biased sensationalist no-standards news source stops short of calling a 17-year-old who got smoked by the cops a 'child'. That's simply not how we, as a society, use the word 'child'. Calling somebody a pedophile for not abiding by your uniquely idiosyncratic "when they turn 18" definition is ridiculous.

Get your shit together. This really crosses a line. 'Pedophile' is an extremely powerful word that you can't just be throwing around at people like it's nothing.
 
It is a terrible reason to call somebody a pedophile. Even the most biased sensationalist no-standards news source stops short of calling a 17-year-old who got smoked by the cops a 'child'. That's simply not how we, as a society, use the word 'child'. Calling somebody a pedophile for not abiding by your uniquely idiosyncratic "when they turn 18" definition is ridiculous.

Get your shit together. This really crosses a line. 'Pedophile' is an extremely powerful word that you can't just be throwing around at people like it's nothing.
But no one is calling kids in middle school or younger adults (which is the age we're talking about with girls who have boobs), except people who have very bad intentions for them. Especially since like I mentioned, girls being creeped on and basically ripped from their childhoods the second they start puberty (no matter how young they are) is a pretty common problem. I went through it and I think it's something most women experience to some extent.

Creepy dudes saying that secondary sex characteristics=no longer a TRUE and HONEST child is something that's going to raise alarms for most women, since they know firsthand it's usually predators saying shit like that (not just schizos who somehow spent the entirety of middle school not noticing girls have boobs).

Plus even older teens do get called children. The articles about the murder of Brianna Ghey referred to both her and the murderers as children (they were all 16-17 iirc). Though that's beside the point.
 
I went through it and I think it's something most women experience to some extent.
Which is the massive difference here by the way.
You're using retarded personal experience as an excuse for your rampant pedo accusations.

I'm using behavioral fucking models. Also lolcow threads. And more. Specifically on you.
Also your r34 account and your weirdass fascination with retarded faggotry.

But they're actually 500 years old, but they're not real, but it's just ironic. Though. Right?
Fuck off spedo.
 
Yes I agree that men are often willfully oblivious and very unempathetic to exclusively female problems.
We don't need you to care. We've already made the legal system pretty gynocentric so your the bitch now.
So, you have had sex,
So, you're a virgin who needs to project their sexual frustration onto happy women? Lol
 
Creepy dudes saying that secondary sex characteristics=no longer a TRUE and HONEST child is something that's going to raise alarms for most women, since they know firsthand it's usually predators saying shit like that (not just schizos who somehow spent the entirety of middle school not noticing girls have boobs).
There is a really good word you can use for situations like that and it's called "sus". Some of your statements have been "sus". Some of mine have been "sus". Probably everyone in this thread, at some point or another, has said something "sus". The cool thing about "sus" is you can articulate your concerns and point out the red flags you're seeing without outright calling somebody a pedophile, and they get a chance to clarify or add context to the sussy thing they just said.

Because, to be frank with you, in all standard English definitions and in contemporary parlance, "child" generally refers to prepubescents. When people take umbrage with your overexpansive use of the word, it's much more likely to come from their distaste for your deliberate misuse of the English language than from an actual predatory interest in young teenagers.
 
There is a really good word you can use for situations like that and it's called "sus". Some of your statements have been "sus". Some of mine have been "sus". Probably everyone in this thread, at some point or another, has said something "sus". The cool thing about "sus" is you can articulate your concerns and point out the red flags you're seeing without outright calling somebody a pedophile, and they get a chance to clarify or add context to the sussy thing they just said.

Because, to be frank with you, in all standard English definitions and in contemporary parlance, "child" generally refers to prepubescents. When people take umbrage with your overexpansive use of the word, it's much more likely to come from their distaste for your deliberate misuse of the English language than from an actual predatory interest in young teenagers.
If "child" is supposed to refer to prepubscents exclusively that's kinda fucked since girls typically start puberty sometime in elementary school (between ages 8-11). 8-11 year olds are children in my book regardless of how developed they are.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Puff and Teghern
If "child" is supposed to refer to prepubscents exclusively that's kinda fucked since girls typically start puberty sometime in elementary school (between ages 8-11). 8-11 year olds are children in my book regardless of how developed they are.
It's not really fucked, it's just what the word means. I agree that there's a large grey area of crossover, and it's common and not at all weird to continue referring to girls as "children" long past the dictionary definition, and somebody calling a pubescent ten year old "not a child" would be extremely sussy, but generally around 13 or 14 we stop calling them "children" and start calling them "teenagers". The older they get after this point, the weirder and weirder it is to continue calling them "children", to the point where it's really unusual to see people referring to 17 year olds as children unless they're deliberately trying to use very emotionally loaded language to push a point.

It's perfectly valid for somebody to dislike these kind of deliberately loaded language tricks without being a pedophile.
 
It's not really fucked, it's just what the word means. I agree that there's a large grey area of crossover, and it's common and not at all weird to continue referring to girls as "children" long past the dictionary definition, and somebody calling a pubescent ten year old "not a child" would be extremely sussy, but generally around 13 or 14 we stop calling them "children" and start calling them "teenagers". The older they get after this point, the weirder and weirder it is to continue calling them "children", to the point where it's really unusual to see people referring to 17 year olds as children unless they're deliberately trying to use very emotionally loaded language to push a point.

It's perfectly valid for somebody to dislike these kind of deliberately loaded language tricks without being a pedophile.
Still, continuing to deny children (as in like 8, 9, 10 year olds) can have secondary sexual characteristics like breasts and insist only adults have those things after being told how young female puberty begins and even being linked to medical papers on the subject is mad sus. Which is what happened in that thread from what I remember.

Even teens aren't typically called adults, and I would hope everyone would know that a 14 year-old isn't an adult even if you don't call them a child.
 
Last edited:
I was a kid wearing t-shirts and jeans/boys shorts. Any adult could tell I was a kid. The only one are fault are adult pedos sexually harassing little kids.
Yeah, you weren't wearing fucking booty shorts and other clothing items which shouldn't even exist in kids sizes because your parents were absolute failures who thought it was a good idea to make it easy for pedophiles and creeps to look at you like a piece of meat. It's never the kids fault if they get abused, but the PARENTS bear a lot of responsibility for not properly protecting their kids and making it harder for creeps to get at them.

Guess what, you live in a world where bad people exist, maybe you shouldn't make it so fucking easy for them to do bad things. This is why we as a society agree it's a stupid idea to leave your wallet sitting on the dashboard in your car in detroit. I stg watch this bitch be like "WELL WE SHOULD JUST TEACH MEN NOT TO HECKIN BE PEDOS OR RAPE"
 
Still, continuing to deny children (as in like 8, 9, 10 year olds) can have secondary sexual characteristics like breasts and that only adults have those things after being told how young female puberty begins and even being linking to medical papers on the subject is mad sus. Which is what happened in that thread from what I remember.
I agree, but if he's clinging autisticly to the dictionary definition, he's technically right. At that point you should ask him to clarify what he thinks 'child' means, or stop using the word 'child' and ask him if he thinks it's okay to perv on an eight year old girl.

Accusing people of being pedophiles shouldn't be done lightly, but when people are acting that sussy it's not hard to take their hand and walk them straight into telling on themselves.
 
If you refuse to use the same version of the English language that everyone else uses that's perfectly up to you, but in our version of the English language calling somebody a 'pedophile' is actually a pretty big fucking deal, and you should stop calling people it for no good reason, you unbelievably stupid fucking bitch.
well so much for defending her huh
 
Still, continuing to deny children (as in like 8, 9, 10 year olds) can have secondary sexual characteristics like breasts and insist only adults have those things after being told how young female puberty begins and even being linking to medical papers on the subject is mad sus. Which is what happened in that thread from what I remember.

Even teens aren't typically called adults, and I would hope everyone would know that a 14 year-old isn't an adult even if you don't call them a child.
So you really cannot comprehend how your retardation has rammifications and the consequences of your actions is that literally everyone will assume the worst in you, especially after the faggotry you pull specifically on that person?

You fucking retarded spedo.
I agree, but if he's clinging autisticly to the dictionary definition, he's technically right. At that point you should ask him to clarify what he thinks 'child' means, or stop using the word 'child' and ask him if he thinks it's okay to perv on an eight year old girl.

Accusing people of being pedophiles shouldn't be done lightly, but when people are acting that sussy it's not hard to take their hand and walk them straight into telling on themselves.
I remember he specifically said it isn't. But then this bitch doubled down. By trying to make it about hebephillia instead.

Then she kept going on about her titties for the next 3 hours.
I then call her a retard for it. Then she tries calling ME pedo for 6 hours because I made fun of her not knowing the point the guy was trying to make about secondary sex characteristics.
Hence the 9 hour mark.

She also then went off about how she was a retard that was put in special ed.
Hence spedo.
 
I agree, but if he's clinging autisticly to the dictionary definition, he's technically right. At that point you should ask him to clarify what he thinks 'child' means, or stop using the word 'child' and ask him if he thinks it's okay to perv on an eight year old girl.

Accusing people of being pedophiles shouldn't be done lightly, but when people are acting that sussy it's not hard to take their hand and walk them straight into telling on themselves.
He's not though, because even a teen isnt an adult.

I think he just ended up calling me a pedo for pointing out girls as young as 8 can start puberty and insisted there's no possible way a girl that young could have boobs. Also, that I was lying about what I experienced as a kid. And that the medical papers I linked and stuff were from pedo sources.
 
Lesbians, famous for not caring about women and their rights and being completely infertile (and never the target of shit like corrective rape).
More like you just admitted you base your opinions on personal experience. Spedo.

So what kind of personal experience does a lesbian have about abortion I wonder.
This is the part where you try ignoring me while trying to kiss ass on a neutral party btw. Have fun.
 
Back