- Joined
- Feb 28, 2021
I think it's more of a fishing lure to see what bites they get. Creative Artists Agency is worth $7bil and they have the likes of Gaga on their books (no doubt how that meeting was engineered), as has been observed in this thread already the music video actually looks to have been pretty cheaply made (compared to music videos).Do the people marketing this expect it to perform well just because a transsexual is in it, did they invest into it as they expected it to manufacture a bigger (and more profitable) controversy than it's managed to, or are they truly just inept & gave somebody with no understanding of the human experience cash to burn making his fantasy vid with no thought into where that would lead
I think a telling thing is the lack of buzz around it. There obviously was a launch party -
(these were shared from Jodie Foster's wife's account) but I'm struggling to find anything about this at all online. There were clearly a range of songs performed and Chris Colfer put in an appearance, but no articles, no presser, no photographers who've sold to Getty Editorial. Compare that to this time last year, before the Bud Light damage set in, where he hosted a variety show in the NBC Rainbow Room with a range of (C list) celebrities. Instead there's a small time show and a social media launch of a cheap music video for an overproduced song.
Possibly they're trying to gauge where Dylan's positioned in the market. On the other hand it might be a way of trying to keep him relevant. His other "produced" content was a Christmas video (back when he was still going full "mid century"), the face reveal, Day 365, that "Blue Christmas" cover where he made out with a pooner and now this. They may all be designed to stoke controversy, same with getting Gaga to feature him on Instagram for International Women's Day. The papers have started picking up "Days of Girlhood". Could be useful having a professional victim on the books.
Speaking of, he went to the Google & GLAAD Bold and Responsible Dinner last night.



"Brought to you by Google, the event was a gathering of powerful voices in LGBTQ+ media, entertainment and technology – highlighting the power of diverse storytelling to shape a more inclusive and equitable world." Pictured with Sarah Kate Ellis (President of GLAAD), and then G Flip (lesbian non binary rapper), Chrishell Stause (American soap opera actress and married to G Flip) and the stripy monstrosity in the background is Alok. Oh and the Tuternuck Jackie dress is £210/$270 and the Gucci Horsebit pumps are £715/$910 so once again he's wearing over $1000 worth of clothes.
A cynical management firm might find it lucrative to have Dylan constantly subjected to transphobic hate and cynically encourage Gaga to take a photo of him on International Women's Day to draw attention, and then let him release a song shortly after that reduces being a woman to "taking pills", "having sex with strangers" and "shopping" because when the backlash comes, he's once again a victim and then the LGBT media starts talking about him again. If he can't be the friendly face of transgenderism via brand sponsorship deals because he's too toxic, choosing to instead capitalise off that toxicity isn't a bad pivot. It could inflate his booking fee the next time a company wants to have a speaker about transphobia, and if they're looking for trans people to fill seats to show they're inclusive avoids them going "Who?", but instead "Oh yeah, Dylan, the one who keeps getting all that transphobic hate from right wingers!".