Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
People are confused why people really hate Destiny? Because he’s insincere. He’ll call you a liar or partisan when he is transparently that. Can you imagine debating some retard about a topic you have studied intensely and written about and he comes out with Wikipedia citations and misquotes someone you know from the wrong perspective? It’d be infuriating.

That’s what pisses me off about Destiny. He’s taken DNC money and called people partisan. He doesn’t have any beliefs. He reminds me of early Amazing Atheist stuff where he’s blatantly trying to get a reaction, but at least AA is blatantly a fucking retard. Destiny pretends otherwise.
 
Awnuh is so mentally ill and obsessed she actually pinned the picture that Destiny liked.
1710537626468.png
 
I don't get Destiny's involvement. I have my opinions about the conflict (as do many) and I believe everyone can agree (except Destiny fans) that his involvement was disastrous (for the whole debate).
He's had a reputation as some masterful debater and midwits believe it since they're easily dazzled by Ben Shapiro style fast talking.

The weaknesses with Steven's debating style really shine through though when debating in person and especially when it's against someone who sees zero reason to be tolerant of his bullshit. Reminds me of how most of the Bloodsports stuff fizzled out as soon as people went in ready to mock the opposition.
 
That’s what pisses me off about Destiny. He’s taken DNC money and called people partisan. He doesn’t have any beliefs. He reminds me of early Amazing Atheist stuff where he’s blatantly trying to get a reaction, but at least AA is blatantly a fucking retard. Destiny pretends otherwise.
He's also a deadbeat dad by choice, which is far more evident of his character than anything else.
 
i'm mostly a lurker because the drama is fun, but do you guys genuinely think Destiny looked worse than Norm in the debate, or are u all just hyper coping?
People find Norm's unwillingness to engage with Tiny to be a positive, since most people hate Destiny, they consider Tiny an overconfident midwit and Norm continuous use of ad-hominems to be a good thing as Tiny isn't a person worth engaging with at any level.
Your opinion of how they both did in the debate is going to depend on whether or not you think Norm should be engaging with Destiny or not. Is Finkelstein too well-regarded to even begin to have a discussion about the topic with a piano-playing carpet cleaner, or is Norm too caught up sniffing his own farts and did poorly by dismissing Destiny's points, allowing Tiny to form a convincing argument against many of Norm's claims?

I think Norm did poorly in the actual substance of what's being debated, he refused to engage at any level even with Benny Morris he was dismissive, but rhetorically Destiny was atrocious for much of the debate, unless you were already on his side from the beginning.
 
I don't get Destiny's involvement. I have my opinions about the conflict (as do many) and I believe everyone can agree (except Destiny fans) that his involvement was disastrous (for the whole debate).

I think its obvious Density took the Ziobux (although I'm sure they paid him far more than 5 grand)


I check Twitter and he is fucking trending with over 80 thousand tweets. Who did this guy piss off?
View attachment 5818032

There's that slur again, "gusano." I had never heard of that one before so I had to look it up and apparently its like calling someone a filthy parasite but with a Cuban twist. I'll let you decide if that's an accurate description of Density or not (it is)
gusano.jpg
 
I think Norm did poorly in the actual substance of what's being debated, he refused to engage at any level even with Benny Morris he was dismissive,
I kept reading comments like this claiming that Norm kept using ad hominems and wouldn't respond to anything Destiny said, and assumed Finkelstein must have done a terrible job, but then watching roughly half of the debate so far I don't see where this is true at all. Even in the part where he calls Destiny a fantastic moron, he says there were journalists and civilians in the area Israel struck and that what they hit was just some old shack, not a "Hamas compound" like Destiny claimed.
Last-moments-of-four-Palestinian-boys-before-Israeli-shell-wiped-hit-them-on-a-Gaza-beach.jpg

The four kids who were killed by a secondary strike by Israel as they were running away from the explosion, and the remnants of the building that Finkelstein claims was just some shack and Destiny/Israel claim was a Hamas naval compound. I'll leave it to you to decide which side you think is correct, but saying that Finkelstein wasn't engaging with their arguments is just silly.

On that note I'd like to say I hope Destiny never gets invited to anything like this again, I do like debates and I like that the discussion surrounding debates can often add extra context, but Jesus Christ the fact that Destiny is primarily a video game streamer means that his fans have shit up virtually every discussion of this debate I can find with pointless cheerleading. It's very obvious from their attempts to sound smart that their usual way of engaging with this kind of content is to just have it alt tabbed while they play video games and then listen when the shouting starts, because those are the only parts they actually discuss, and unsurprisingly, they don't have anything interesting or meaningful to say. I used to be more neutral on Destiny and his fanbase, but their behavior is so obnoxious it's no wonder they have a bad reputation.
 
i'm mostly a lurker because the drama is fun, but do you guys genuinely think Destiny looked worse than Norm in the debate, or are u all just hyper coping?
I’m gonna answer you in good faith, even though it feels you’re pretending to not understand what everyone has laid out about his performance.

Do you honestly believe he did well? Why isn’t Destiny reiterating the points he supposedly looked good on/“won” with right now, instead of digging through documents about Norm beefing with his neighbors? He’s on Twitter rn, trying to find literally anything else on Norm to get an own. Is that a winner?

Does that honestly sound like he did good in this debate? I’ve made it clear I don’t like him, but if he’d honestly done better than I thought, I’d give him credit. I think even he knows he didn’t defend his position (whatever that truly is) very well at all. Benny carried him.
 
i'm mostly a lurker because the drama is fun, but do you guys genuinely think Destiny looked worse than Norm in the debate, or are u all just hyper coping?
Let me give you some perspective.

I came into the debate far more sympathetic to the position Destiny was supposedly advocating and absolutely loathing Finkelstein, but I walked away with a deeper disgust for Destiny while feeling sympathetic to Finkelstein’s person.

I have a graduate degree in an area of the Humanities that overlaps with Finkelstein’s interest in the Middle East. The man has a well earned reputation in Higher Education as being dysfunctional and combative with just about everybody and I’ve personally seen him get taken apart by knowledgeable scholars because his familiarity with primary sources and the languages they are communicated in is lacking. Finkelstein’s training is more geared for social science and the conceptual tools he employs are not suited very well for defending the positions he stakes out.

That being said, Finkelstein actually has some accomplishments under his belt that merit some level of respect. More importantly, he can actually have meaningful disagreements with people and conduct himself in a respectable manner. I’ve also been told he actually isn’t that bad of a teacher and that students generally enjoy his classes because he can be provocative without crossing a line.

By contrast, Destiny’s accomplishments are all related to being an influencer on social media. The guy didn’t obtain his audience because he dedicated 5 to 10 years to disciplined research into a topic where he developed substantive beliefs that he can articulate to audiences and defend against epistemic peers. At best, Destiny has a surface level understanding of the Israel/Palestine conflict and hasn’t expended one percentile of the effort required to actually develop ideas enough to actually see them in print in a refereed publication.

This “debate” was a total mismatch and the fact that Destiny approached it exactly like he’d approach a “debate” in Discord was infuriating. He didn’t have anything meaningful to say, brought no insight into the discussion, and couldn’t even be a charming conversation partner. Instead he just did the old routine of asserting a bunch of shit, getting in his little digs, and then waiting for the other person to stop talking before launching into something else.

The sheer hubris of thinking he had something to contribute is incredibly off putting. We aren’t talking about horse cocks with Vaush here, but actual world events where thousands of people are being subject to brutal violence, and he couldn’t even set aside his Napoleon ego for that
 
Awnuh is so mentally ill and obsessed she actually pinned the picture that Destiny liked.
View attachment 5818866
his “pity” like

He’s spent almost 2 days malding on twitter, almost every hour there are multiple tweets from him being uber defensive about comments. Yeah definitely feels like winner mentality, especially going after unrelated Finklestein history. I suppose if I want to be fair I could say that since everyone is going after his character maybe he thinks it’s justified to go after Finklesteins, still doesn’t change the fact that he hasn’t spent any significant portion of his life studying this conflict and history and that’s the main reason people don’t want to listen to anything he has to say on the subject.

Just a reminder, guy doesn’t even care, he just wants to fight with someone he doesn’t like because his fans will love it and validate his existence

 
Last edited by a moderator:
i'm mostly a lurker because the drama is fun, but do you guys genuinely think Destiny looked worse than Norm in the debate, or are u all just hyper coping?
Steve bertolini's entire life is seethe because god gave him an L when he made him a manlet. Your little tiny faggot hero got blown the fuck out when he was basically Norm's punching bag, like his ex wife's cervix for nigger dick.
Go back to lurking, faggot.
 
i'm mostly a lurker because the drama is fun, but do you guys genuinely think Destiny looked worse than Norm in the debate, or are u all just hyper coping?
He is unironically seething about how this has gone for him - just look at his twitter. He spent a long time going through reddit threads on stream reading comments about how bad he did, reading out negative comments in his soy voice.

"What even happened here? What debate did he watch?" - Response to reading random negative reddit comment.

He feels like he's being astrotufed because the far right and far left are both dunking on him. I think he was expecting people to be shocked at Norm insulting him and thought that would look bad. In reality, nobody really cares, and people aren't going to watch a 5 hour debate - it's mostly being spread via clips and literally none of them are positive for Destiny.

Remember, his goal was to somehow discredit Finkelstein during this debate and EXPOSE him for being such a hack. Do you think he achieved that? He is literally planning on changing his entire debate strategy on this subject because of how badly this has went for him.

The four kids who were killed by a secondary strike by Israel as they were running away from the explosion, and the remnants of the building that Finkelstein claims was just some shack and Destiny/Israel claim was a Hamas naval compound.
He talked about this on today's stream (still live so can't link). He (again) ran with the psychotic line of "well, air strikes are signed off by multiple people, so there's no way they intentionally murdered these kids". He doesn't actually go on to justify why the air strikes happened, he just cries about how the IDF can never do anything wrong because people in the military approve air strikes.

This “debate” was a total mismatch and the fact that Destiny approached it exactly like he’d approach a “debate” in Discord was infuriating.
Just a small thing, he thinks the random people he has on his discord have been better conversations than the mainstream figures he's spoken to about this.
 
I’m gonna answer you in good faith, even though it feels you’re pretending to not understand what everyone has laid out about his performance.

Do you honestly believe he did well? Why isn’t Destiny reiterating the points he supposedly looked good on/“won” with right now, instead of digging through documents about Norm beefing with his neighbors? He’s on Twitter rn, trying to find literally anything else on Norm to get an own. Is that a winner?

Does that honestly sound like he did good in this debate? I’ve made it clear I don’t like him, but if he’d honestly done better than I thought, I’d give him credit. I think even he knows he didn’t defend his position (whatever that truly is) very well at all. Benny carried him.
Destiny did alright, but Norm absolutely was the worst in this debate. He looked terrible, he put forth no points, his entire debate strategy was to just screech Morris quotes back at him and ignore anything Destiny said.

The vibe of the debate was that Morris and Rabbani were here to have adult conversations, Destiny was here to support Morris, and Norm was just the autistic child screeching in the corner.

You can't be serious that this nearly dead guy who's devoted his life to Palestinian freedom won a debate with my cucked idol bros. I hope all streamers get stripped of their clothes and paraded around the city like this just because of what a life lacking in dignity they lead and encourage young people to follow.
Norm did terrible in the debate, i don't care about his history or credentials. I'm discussing what happened in the debate, not his credentials.

By contrast, Destiny’s accomplishments are all related to being an influencer on social media. The guy didn’t obtain his audience because he dedicated 5 to 10 years to disciplined research into a topic where he developed substantive beliefs that he can articulate to audiences and defend against epistemic peers. At best, Destiny has a surface level understanding of the Israel/Palestine conflict and hasn’t expended one percentile of the effort required to actually develop ideas enough to actually see them in print in a refereed publication
this is what i'm talking about when i say you're all hyper coping lmao. you can screech about credentials all you want, but the reality is, Norm did terribly in the debate, Destiny did alright.
 
For a large part of the discussion he wasn't, he kept ignoring him and only responded when Benny Morris would ask the question for Destiny or supported Destiny's claim/point.
I'd have to see what you're talking about, but to be blunt if I was in Norman's position I'd ignore Destiny like a little kid who was brought along because the babysitter cancelled last minute too. In that same discussion about the four kids being vaporized by the IDF, Destiny hits Norman with "you're implying that a strike was OK'd on the Israeli side where they just said 'we're gonna kill four Palestinian children today for no reason'" It's such a ridiculous argument, and worse it points to the quality of debate that Destiny prepares himself for. Not even a holocaust denier will argue that people think the Nazis exterminated people for no reason, so why Destiny made the rather stupid assumption that Norman must imagine the Israelis have no strategic or ideological goals in mind when they kill, displace, imprison or otherwise terrorize the civilian population of Palestine is beyond me.

That statement by itself would be evidence enough for me personally to decide he hasn't seriously engaged with perspectives on the subject beyond whatever superficial reading of the topic he figured was enough to elicit gotcha moments during a debate. There is simply no point in talking to a person in that state of mind when you're trying to lay out facts.
 

I had an earlier post where my mind was boggled by how Tiny could like such retarded women because I gave him the credit of being an intellectual, but I think I gave him way too much credit, like he was this master manipulator that wanted to remain in control and superior to these young girls. Now I know the truth. He is retarded too, no deeper layers to pick apart just a plain old idiot.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: ovqsnfat
Destiny did alright, but Norm absolutely was the worst in this debate. He looked terrible, he put forth no points, his entire debate strategy was to just screech Morris quotes back at him and ignore anything Destiny said.

The vibe of the debate was that Morris and Rabbani were here to have adult conversations, Destiny was here to support Morris, and Norm was just the autistic child screeching in the corner.


Norm did terrible in the debate, i don't care about his history or credentials. I'm discussing what happened in the debate, not his credentials.
You don't know what the fuck you are talking about, that's not what "did alright" looks like. That's what getting stuffed into a locker looks like.
This fuckign faggot talking about vibes, you aren't a serious person.
 
Back