Katy Montgomerie / Colin Hugh Montgomerie / @KatyMontgomerie / @KatysCartoons / completelykaty - Destroyer of Gender Criticals, victim of misogyny, MSPaint cartoonist

Late one evening a couple of years ago, I came across Colin shouting at women on Twitter using one of his sock accounts. I posted the below picture and in seconds he was along as Katy, railing and fuming at me. He was very cross and threatening to get me banned etc. Then his army of flying monkeys came for me - for hours. Oh the Golden days. It has and always will be AGP for Colin. To really get under his skin you need to remind him of this when he‘s waffling on about colours.
I‘m pretty sure some old face book footage surfaced recently of him playing with himself wearing bras. I’m travelling, so not sure if I can find it now but it was lonely, depressing and creepy.
[/SPOILER]
Edit. May have bolloxed up the spoilering.

@Candidate No 7 good lord, sorry I looked.
 
Colin mocks a female anthropologist who was hounded out of her job for saying she could sex skeletons (who also got smacked with a racism charge from "mishandling" Native remains. Archive.
Screenshot_20240319-203803_(1).png
Again with this debate. We absolutely can tell, especially with the skull and teeth. These archaeology students saying it's impossible don't actually practice in the field - they're just students. Odontology and genetics would be too hard for them.
Screenshot_20240319-203845_(1).png
PACK IT UP BOYS THE POONER HAS A LARGER HEAD THAN A MALE

These people fit that meme that low IQ people don't understand averages or clusters. If I say men are taller than women, someone will say, "but I know a tall woman" as if that debunks the original statement. So it is here:
"Males have larger skulls."
"But I know a woman with a large skull."

Also, your pooner is gonna be clocked once they get their teeth checked. She's going to be crying from the grave.

Screenshot_20240319-202111_(1).png
 
Colin mocks a female anthropologist who was hounded out of her job for saying she could sex skeletons (who also got smacked with a racism charge from "mishandling" Native remains. Archive.
View attachment 5831944
Again with this debate. We absolutely can tell, especially with the skull and teeth. These archaeology students saying it's impossible don't actually practice in the field - they're just students. Odontology and genetics would be too hard for them.
View attachment 5831946
PACK IT UP BOYS THE POONER HAS A LARGER HEAD THAN A MALE

These people fit that meme that low IQ people don't understand averages or clusters. If I say men are taller than women, someone will say, "but I know a tall woman" as if that debunks the original statement. So it is here:
"Males have larger skulls."
"But I know a woman with a large skull."

Also, your pooner is gonna be clocked once they get their teeth checked. She's going to be crying from the grave.

View attachment 5831950
They also like to argue with points learned in a very cursory manner. "Well in summer camp, we learned you can't tell the difference between sex and skeletal remains."

In the comments in that thread, people were comparing the science to phrenology because it involves measuring the skull. That alone should be a strong indicator you're dealing with sublime ignorance.
 
They also like to argue with points learned in a very cursory manner. "Well in summer camp, we learned you can't tell the difference between sex and skeletal remains."

In the comments in that thread, people were comparing the science to phrenology because it involves measuring the skull. That alone should be a strong indicator you're dealing with sublime ignorance.
It remains eternally funny that they think we can’t tell by looking as they delve into muh summer camp, muh color spectrum, muh clownfish, muh fungi or bird species, muh intersex, muh nazis etc etc

These dudes look like dudes lol all the deflection in the world won’t change that. No woman alive has to beg and plead her woman credentials. They sure aren’t confused about the binary when they have rot pockets installed, shave their faces down, and get bolt ons.
 
I can't even figure out how they arrived at the "elements" analogy. It is like countering "There are only two sexes" with "But there are strawberry ice cream!"
Colin posted the graph of how Hydrogen and Helium are such a massive amount in our galaxy compared to the otherr elements, but all those other elements exist with proof and are important and necessary. I'm not sure if he started it, but the point he's trying to make is that the gender bianary isn't a bianary, it's a spectrum: man and woman are like hydrogen and helium (ignore the ratio difference) which makes up the major part of our genders to the point they dwarf others, and trans genders, the minuscule percentage, are a spectrum of other elements who are important and definitely exist.

So he's fucking retarded because he's using it as DEFINITE PROOF instead of an analogy for others to understand the theory of gender spectrum better, which I assume was the metaphor's original purpose. Colin is profoundly stupid yet again. He's the type of tech bro who shouldn't venture out of his original knowledge sphere without a great humbling.
 
I can't even figure out how they arrived at the "elements" analogy. It is like countering "There are only two sexes" with "But there are strawberry ice cream!"
Also Colin isn't intersex, he's a non intersex male who claims to be female. Even if you were to prove a third category outside of male and female, how is that proof that those first two categories aren't immutable. It's like saying "actually grapes exist, therefore apples can become oranges."
 
the point he's trying to make is that the gender bianary isn't a bianary, it's a spectrum: man and woman are like hydrogen and helium (ignore the ratio difference) which makes up the major part of our genders to the point they dwarf others, and trans genders, the minuscule percentage, are a spectrum of other elements who are important and definitely exist.
But that doesn't even make sense: oxygen isn't part-hydrogen, part-helium.
 
But that doesn't even make sense: oxygen isn't part-hydrogen, part-helium.
Hey, I didn't say it does, I said Colin is retarded and barely thinks beyond metaphors. Him and his commenters also said that OH people like you think if an atom picks up another proton it's totally still the same element, so their brains are working overtime to stretch that metaphorical garbage bag allllll the way around how elements work but it's so stretched out that holes have formed and it looks more like a bunch of plastic flapping in the wind than a solid bag now.
 
The first I ever saw of Colin was my GF used to watch this insufferable atheist/skeptic/debate community, and Colin was a part. A channel had some drama where one of the owners pulled a coup, Kyle Curts locked the other owner Steve Mc Something out of the account, and took all the YT earnings. Colin inserted himself in the drama, and of course was lobbying on behalf of the thief, who later lost a lawsuit regarding the channel theft. Colin would make all of these wild claims on behalf of Kyle during the debacle, to me that first introduction to Colin set the tone of my disdain.

I notice the communities mentioned above have a large troon contingent, which for anyone considering themselves rational and skeptical is just base irony. Even the Bishop of Atheists, Matt Dillahunty is currently banging a troon. That probably accounts for his tendency to be wrapped a little tight and short-fused.
 
I think they think elements are on a spectrum because you can plot them all out by how many electrons they have. Which is an effective layman's description of the Periodic Table and why things keep getting discovered and added to it.

It's less a fundamental misunderstanding of elements than it is of spectrums and how they work. Math error more than science error.

Sexes simply isn't a spectrum, you can prove this by asking them to make one. They can't do it, they'll link you to a distribution of something and claim it's a spectrum.
 
the comments in that thread, people were comparing the science to phrenology because it involves measuring the skull. That alone should be a strong indicator you're dealing with sublime ignorance.
Of course they do. Unfortunately for them one of the fields that confirms sexual dimorphism in skills is non other than facial feminization surgery. It goes into detail about all those differences they say doesn't exist.

They never back up their claims with a source. If someone else posts one, they jump on that person and mock them for being stupid.

Troons denying skull and skeleton dimorphism might be something I'll post in the "scientific studies" on troons thread, because it's a repeat claim they love going back to. Tyler Sternbach also made a viral tweet on it when he was still using his Juniper account, highlighting his BA as proof of expert status.
 
You don't even need to consult scientists, pick up an artists handbook, every one of them have clear male female mannequin and skeletal distinctions.
Or use your damn eyes.

Or cuddle someone of the opposite (or same if that floats your boat) and you can feel the differences. You may need to cuddle lots of people to make sure you get the differences.
 
Or cuddle someone of the opposite (or same if that floats your boat) and you can feel the differences. You may need to cuddle lots of people to make sure you get the differences.
As much as it depresses me to say this, that's a pretty high demand for the vast majority of the male species, might be too high
 
Colin is now trying to lecture award-winning professor of biology Richard Dawkins in his own discipline

fucking mong.png

Love how that last line shows just how much of a sped Colin is. Richard's original statement said exactly the same thing as Colin: that intersex people are not "trans", but somehow Richard is wrong when Colin the crossdresser repeats his assertion.
 
Back