Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
Nah, you guys don’t get it. The license plate reads “LAWPOPE”. The whole car is an advertisement for his snazzy business, Rekieta Law (although not a law channel nor a practicing lawyer) Can’t do that with a civic. It has to be a retarded flexmobile. Don’t agree? That’s stifling Nick’s free speech to advertise how he wants! A million lawsuits to the IRS! Randazza, let’s goooo!

He genuinely thinks he's still the so-called "Pope" of LawTube. He's like that one drunk at every single bar that still wears his high school letterman's jacket everywhere, and talks about how he's still the king.
 
The US's tax code is a nightmare but I'm pretty sure that you can't just do that. Like sure, you might use the car for business but there's way more to it than that right? I'm a low IQ retard so I don't know but the idea that everything can be written off doesn't pass the sniff test to me.
It isn't remotely true. For instance if you want to claim a home office so as to deduct things like a computer, printer, filing cabinets and other things, you'd best be prepared in an audit to show them that it's in a segregrated place and is not for personal use. There's some allowance for mixed business/personal use, and you can only deduct the business use of the item, usually a larger item like a vehicle, but you had best have records showing what part of the use was business and what part personal. If not they'll just disallow it, throw in some fines, and now you'll owe even more than you would have if not for your dipshit shenanigans.

The home office rule can actually be really useful because they often involve a lot of small (in tax terms) purchases like printers and computers and filing cabinets and the like, and you can often deduct part or all of them the year you get them, or use accelerated depreciation to write them off for wearing out and going bad in advance. But again, you have to segregate the use, and this generally requires an actual physical space that constitutes the office. It could be as simple as a corner of a room, but if it's business, business should be what goes on there.

Unless Balldo could show that car is used entirely for business, he'd be fucked. No driving around kids drunk off his ass at 3 a.m. or whatever the fuck he says he does, at least not without keeping meticulous records of which uses are actually business. Bitch can't even show up to be a drunken idiot on stream half the time. You think this nonpracticing lawyer keeps records?
Of course then there's the fact that the car he would be attempting to write off isn't a Honda civic or an utility van but a retarded flexmobile, while I'm unsure if there are statutes about the kind of vehicle you are writing off, that's certain to raise eyebrows with whoever is checking your papers.
There isn't, but there's a limit. You can't just depreciate it instantly as a lump sum, it has to depreciate on an annual basis, and the max you can deduct for a normal sized car (under 6000 pounds) is limited, and the amount you can deduct decreases sharply each year, so there's also a maximum possible amount. So you can buy that Lamborghini Countach and depreciate it annually, but possibly not for much more, or any more at all, than that utility van.

It's a little more than needs to be gone into here but here are the current details:

It's more efficient to lease that luxury vehicle, if for some reason you feel you actually need it, like you're a salesman (or even a practicing lawyer) who needs to look affluent to create an impression for the kind of clients you're seeking. Would you hire a lawyer in a beat-up Kia? I mean I probably would if I knew the guy and he was just unassuming but a lot of people will make really superficial judgments based on things like that when lacking any other information on the guy. ETA: the point I forgot to make here is you can deduct the lease immediately without diddling around with years of depreciation.
 
Last edited:
That's a lot of coping cgoody "i dont even follow stuff anymore" ok seethe replying in elbs clips
This little group has always been threatened by any invitation into self-awareness. It's too risky as it could create an opening for even the teeniest of light into their individual need to be noticed and accepted by a fangroup of socially redundant rubes listening to a faggot with a microphone. It's thus no coincidence they have a kneejerk hate response when the topic of the Farms comes up. Coming upon such discussions that might involve actual character analysis and critique are a big "no no" under this flock. They've all more or less said in innumerable ways "We don't like that!" when such topics come up, as to avoid any pain or discomfort to their delicate psyche. Hence this blubbering mess of parasocial moonspeak masquerading as a critical response to one of its longest, most prominent members.

None of them actually care about "Mandy" or their whereabouts. There's no way they could care, because according to them, it's not even relevant what their real identity even is. They were content with Mandy as the community's pet parrot, even if it means sharing the same intellectual and emotional capacity as one. What an endearing bunch. It's just a terrible inconvenience that others have put them in the position to have to explain away their existence at all. These are dodgy attempts to avoid any secondhand embarrassment per a shrinking community, I get that.

However, even their critique of Mandy's behavior isolated from the identity issue is particularly special. It's as if none of them have invented crises or engaged in similar emotionally depraved attention-seeking behavior just to get more screen time with either the Creator or "the community". One unflattering critique of such tendencies by an unfriendly source and it's like listening to a flock of birds tap away at the screen, as dweebish social rejects saber rattle on with pseudo-intellectual prowess, as if they're the only ones who have ever critiqued online behavior. Amazing. Their most visible member's only claims to being remotely "dangerously charismatic" was sharing lewds and suicide baiting in an HTML room. That is really about the sum of it and not a good look. Still, it is uncanny how they always seem to match up perfectly with the Creator's current position on the scale of whimsical cringe in their attempts to retell history. That portion of the dialogue is at least more insightful.

Their ease in erasing the past and accepting a pathological liar back into the fold without the risks of critical thinking ("no bullying behavior allowed!!1! be nice to the chat's sex bot! squakk") gives us an idea about their own perceived credibility as individuals while within that space and the overall group's attachments to authenticity. Naturally, is any of this really a surprise? Look who they represent.

I never have understood the appeal of being in a parasocial club, because from what little we do see much of the time spent seems to be complaining about the passage of time (no show? no shoow?), indulging in behavior that would at best be described as "tacky" or helping one another nurse each other's lesser social wounds/mid-life crisis.

Nick himself enjoys a good pity party and the false pride he can weave from it (anything that he can spin into a victory tour). The most parasocial amongst this group seem to thrive off of it. So I guess unsurprisingly the few that do remain have fully adopted the same narcissistic traits in themselves, at least to the extent their anonymity will allow for. Thus, the Mandy topic must be like a stinky turd that drops too close to home. They're still there and for the same reason as the Mandy bot: cheap validation. Anonymity is a form of currency for some online, and that anonymity can be traded for attention and interest. "Mandy" irl was never going to be get them the attention they really craved so "she" made up shit. And certainly none of them have any reason or incentive to engage in similar storytelling.
Edit: "parrot" not "party"; Though party would also be accurate...
Oh did he finally figure out the unplug router trick? watch this repeat once a week for the next 6 months.
I'm not even trying to do this right and I have backup internet options that are available if my main goes down. Hard to believe a "professional streamer" doesn't have some solution.
Nah, you guys don’t get it. The license plate reads “LAWPOPE”. The whole car is an advertisement for his snazzy business, Rekieta Law (although not a law channel nor a practicing lawyer) Can’t do that with a civic. It has to be a retarded flexmobile. Don’t agree? That’s stifling Nick’s free speech to advertise how he wants! A million lawsuits to the IRS! Randazza, let’s goooo!
LAWCOPE is more accurate at this point. It also would make a good number for a business line. He should reserve it ASAP.
 
Last edited:
This is tangentially related to Nick, but does anyone remember the comedy show he did? I believe it was back in October. Chrissie Mayr invited him to do standup when she was in Minnesota, but she pulled out at the last minute. People were speculating why, wondering if it had anything to do with Nick's decline or behavior.

Turns out, no. Unfortunately, Chrissie's dad was murdered the night before. So, her cancellation had absolutely nothing to do with Nick or anyone else involved with the show.
 
You're right, I just checked on YT, last video 7 months ago (some degen anime con bullshit), last short March 23, 2023. Everything else is just livestreams. Incredible.
Is it possible that he has some secret business, like Tomlinson had his Airbnb for a long time without anyone realizing?
If Rekieta has a secret business, it's either drugs (reselling the dope he's buying from Jamal in Minneapolis) or prostitution (himself or his slatternly wife). I can't imagine either is making a lot of money, but maybe I'm wrong and the incel Scandinavian prudes pay big bucks for the shitty fent-laced garbage Nick buys.
Why do so many threads devolve to talking about the IRS and taxes?
:really:
It hasn't totally devolved yet. Just wait until someone proposes to report Nick to the IRS and Null has to remind them that it's faggot behavior on par with reporting him to CPS.
 
I miss the beeping robot
The beeping robot would have a more successful YouTube channel than the garbage Nick puts out.
The time to rebrand would have been 2022 and going true-crime. He still had the winemoms at that point. He wouldn't even need to change the name. There is no pathway for him to go internet shockjock like dax. He simply isn't good at it.
He isn't good at much of anything. The only benefit he had was being one of the first. Otherwise he is the Jack Scalfani of law.
This is a good start Nick. Now just keep it off for the next 6-12 months and focus on your family. Wait, who am I kidding, have fun at Gay 90s, have the most expensive bottle they have to celebrate.
Why would you wish that on his kids? If he wanted to give his kids a better life, he would get the balldo mobile up to 90 and aim for a toll booth.
That said, I think his LOTY days are over.
He's a good candidate for cow put out to pasture.
Checking in on LOCALS. Where have all the fans gone who supported Nick and his need to take breaks to avoid burn-out?
What a bunch of pathetic, sad.... What's less than a beta male? Whatever that is. That's what they are.
His branding and his livestream setup has been largely the same since 2021.
That's the least of his problems. It's the content, stupid.
Not to mention he's abandoned uploading content to his channels entirely.
The only thing I've seen Ryan the Editor do this past year is noseguard, poorly and not very often. You could say the quality of work is consistent.
 
Are there any actual irl farmers here? What do you call a cow which refuses to produce milk, and yet, it appears to be seeking attention from the bulls?
moo.jpg
 
That meeting with Rumble is gonna go amazingly. I can picture it now. "Wait wait wait. Here's $2,500 worth of whiskey. Take it. Take it all." "No, I don't think so, Nick! I don't think I want your whiskey. I think you fucked up my platform, and I think you're going away!" "Are you NUTS!? I'm gonna stream for you! Take....look, I'm gonna make this platform and be number one on that front page!" "Ha!" "Wait! Here's what we're gonna do. Twenty percent. I'm gonna give you twenty percent of all my superchats as long as I'm with Rumble. Fifty? Fifty percent of all my superchats?" "What superchats?" "What superchats!? I just got superchatted $82,000! Are you out of your fuckin mind!? I'm back! This is just the beginning!" "Just the beginning!? Where have you been, Nick!? DickLikieta and DiddlerDrex!? You wanna see the chargebacks!? They're trolls! Did you see what they were chatting!? How can you delude yourself?" "The chats are no good? Wait a minute. The chats are no good!?" "You wanna call the bank? I called the bank 4 months ago when they first started the chargebacks. The people are just trolls. They just like laughing at drunkards." "Don't....." "I'm sorry." "Why?" "Because I don't like you." "..........my family?" "Fuck you."
 
This would be illegal in the UK. If you trap an animal that's regarded as a pest of some kind -- we don't have raccoons, that I'm aware of, but say you caught rats? You can't go releasing those pests on land that you don't own. It's akin to delivering a plague to somebody else's property. It's a criminal offence and you'd be potentially liable for any civil damages -- ie, paying pest controllers to eradicate them from the land where you released them.

Although people tend to think they're doing the humane thing, they actually aren't. Animals that get transplanted into strange territory generally struggle to survive. They'll often panic. Most pest controllers in the UK believe that the best way to deal with the issue is by humanely killing them.
Bullshit. When has anyone releasing a rat been successfully charged with a criminal offence?

In the UK it is questionably illegal to release non native animals that have been trapped . Anything native, release it at will. Anywhere. Animals released to territories that meet their needs have a good opportunity to survive. Most pest controllers anywhere believe it is best to pay them to kill animals because that is their business model.
 
Last edited:
This is tangentially related to Nick, but does anyone remember the comedy show he did? I believe it was back in October. Chrissie Mayr invited him to do standup when she was in Minnesota, but she pulled out at the last minute. People were speculating why, wondering if it had anything to do with Nick's decline or behavior.

Turns out, no. Unfortunately, Chrissie's dad was murdered the night before. So, her cancellation had absolutely nothing to do with Nick or anyone else involved with the show.
Damn that's rough, don't like the dumb cunt and my sympathies are with her on this one. Nick's balldo probably pulled the trigger tho.
 
Back