Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

I think if anyone wants to study the mindset and psychology of religious fanaticism in the modern world, these Rowling haters are a good example.

This Wizarding News account really does sound like a witch hunter of the 1600s.

Everything that they accuse Rowling of, even when undeniable and impartial evidence proves the accusations utterly wrong, they still blame Rowling and declare her responsible for all of the “evil”.

And this isn’t just because she is the Harry Potter woman.

This fucker really has a mentality of Matthew Hopkins.

He probably scurries around where he lives, whipping unseen shadows and cursing spirits, before drowning old ladies.
I dunno man, it seems like real religious institutions, the people at the top running shit know it's a scam and are just doing it for power, the pedophilia, and the exclusive sex nunneries.
Somewhere within the chain people with a solid grasp on reality are running things. They might be real evil, or whatever, but they KNOW.
These people are cultists. There's no higher power that's being worshipped, just a group of people. They are brain washed and told they're hero's and that they're literally saving lives.
Religious people live by a doctrine under the idea that they're going to go somewhere else better.
 
Screenshot_20240322_000617_Brave.jpg
A person they retweeted
genuinely fucking daffy
 
White progressives say shit like this because they think having left wing politics makes them honorary people of color.
It's always interesting because they're the least likely to date outside their race.
Progressive communities never intermingle by race, and white progressives love to call black people every name in the book if they don't agree with them.
Meanwhile your average 5/10 white girl is being hunted wholesale by BBC in the streets, pumping out 3-4 kids to an absentee father.
The real heroes of the black community.
 
I did not catch his original claims due to having a life and Nitter instances being sucky.

Before the fake apology:

View attachment 5834302

View attachment 5834305

I hope her lawyer reams out this smug cunt's arse with a dragon dildo wand:

View attachment 5834313View attachment 5834316
The hell did I just read? The profile name wizardingnews suggests their fans of Harry Potter yet they still hate J K Rowling. I'm confused because being a fan of something and hating said thing's creator makes no sense to me.
 
interesting how JK was hated for years by the right, yet no one was taking photos outside of her home or trying to liable her family, but the side of love and tolerance will do all that and also want her dead

The religious nutters made noise about Harry Potter being Satanic, but more secular righties mostly just rolled their eyes at her (for the time) very normie left/Labour politics.

Neither of those groups went a tenth as crazy as the trans/queers have gone. They feel genuinely betrayed by her, which shows just how demented they are when it comes both to their sexual identities and how invested they were in a fictional world and its creator.
 
I was wondering when the HPANA/wizardingnews guy was going to start showing up here more. About a year ago some one-off tweet he made was on here and I was surprised to look into him and find it was the same guy who once ran one of the main early Harry Potter fan sites. It was an aggregator for news on the series. looking back if someone was able to put that sort of obsessive thing together back then, dude is clearly an autist who’s now turned his obsession on something else. Wiki says Rowling worked with HPANA when Pottermore was launched, so I wonder if she and Jeff Guillaume actually met in saner times, or if he made that up.

Back then when I was looking through his account, he was attacking other Harry Potter fansites from that era that are still around (Mugglenet and The Leaky Cauldron) for not going insane and dedicating themselves to news about how much they hate Rowling like he has.

81816B71-0830-4034-9DF8-DE574F60BE9B.jpeg
7B383067-EB93-4CAB-A62E-637C0E0BFE43.jpeg

Clearly has more than a couple of screws loose and I hope she does sue the hell out of him, except that inevitably the headlines will be EVIL ROWLING IS SUING INNOCENT HARRY POTTER FANS NOW!!!
 
Oh yeah, JKR's legion of nasty bigoted Nazi trolls:
Betty, age 6, attending primary school in a Griffindor scarf because it's kind of cold
Timmy, age 9, attending primary school, waiting to go home so he can assemble that HP Lego set
Tommy, age 12, truanting to play Hogwarts Legacy, what a little shit
Amy, age 15, playing Hogwarts Legacy in mathematics classes on her Switch, it's fine because she can divide 82 by 2 in less than a second

And Adolf Hitler:
hitler.jpg
 
The hell did I just read? The profile name wizardingnews suggests their fans of Harry Potter yet they still hate J K Rowling. I'm confused because being a fan of something and hating said thing's creator makes no sense to me.
It's similar to the way Star Trek under Alex Kurtzman has sought to erase James T. Kirk from existence, despite the character being the bedrock for the entire Trek universe (an obvious fact that we THOUGHT Sheri Redstone understood). Kirk has mostly been relegated to one-line references on Picard and Lower Decks and is absent from most modern promotional images.

The Rowling similarity comes with the people involved in the actual production of Star Trek, who are all acting like offended and entitled pricks who think prime ladies' man and quick-to-action Kirk has become an affront to the show because he's a genuine alpha male who won't suck Kurtzman's dick and won't acknowledge Michael Burnham as being the Yass Kween of Trek.

It genuinely makes me sad that CBS and Paramount have decided to walk this road called "Shatner's Betrayal". I hope they choke on their "nu Trek" shows and never again enjoy the sort of success they had while Shatner was welcomed onto a set.
 
1) it’s a suspicious amount of Jews and Jewish organisations and professionals pushing this tranny shit
2) why can the west as a whole only frame things in relation to what Jews think and feel? Nigga I don’t like sex pests and idgaf what the Jews think about that
I think anyone with common sense can see the large amount of Jews and Jewish organizations who continue to push the troon pedo shit. But, my post was centred on Rowling and the irrational accusations of Holocaust denial that are only there to find reason to continue to hate her.

Of course the Jews will stand up to anyone that undermines their sacred Holocaust while also funding the media that continues to push troons and spread misinformation. Pretty sure they're already on the fence with Rowling because of the goblins.
 
God forbid a celebrity has a sense of privacy and doesn’t share every fucking second of their lives and those of their minor children on multiple social media platforms.

They really can’t put themselves in other people’s shoes do they?

JKR is massively, massively wealthy. Even before all of this shit kicked off, personal and property security would have been a concern because of stalkers, thieves, and kidnapping attempts for ransom. It’s likely even before she roused the swivel eyed ire of the Troon cult, she got advise from very expensive security consultants. One of those pieces of advice would have been not to post details of your life online, as it allows people to figure out the places you frequent. So there’s a good reason for not posting info about her children’s sports fixtures.

Rowling has always been guarded about her private life and choosy about publicity. She doesn’t do a lot of interviews and she doesn’t attend celebrity parties or premieres. This is likely because she doesn’t like doing it and she doesn’t actually have to. If she wants to say something, she’ll do it on Twitter, her website, or in her work.

Celebrities like actors have to keep self-publicising in order to keep fans engaged and their faces in the spotlight, because they are the product. They use their families in the same way because they’re part of the image they are selling; and they might be trying to break the kids into entertainment as well. JKR is not the product being sold. It’s her books and her IPs, neither of which require her to whore herself and her family out on Instagram for promotional purposes.

Her husband is, I believe, a doctor, not a handbag. JKR is intelligent, rich, and had a shitty first marriage, she was probably very careful about who she got hitched to the second time around. He has his own career and isn’t a public figure. He’d have been given the same advice as Rowling about keeping himself and his family safe.

As for her parenting style - we literally know nothing about it and I think it’s telling these terminally online lunatics think a willingness to give children privacy and anonymity is somehow a sign of abusiveness. Her eldest child, Jessica, is an adult and presumably no longer lives with her mum. She probably also has access to a massive trust fund so if her mum was a complete monster she’d be able to come out and say “FUcK YOU MUMMY!” and still have a life of comfort.

My armchair psych. opinion is that these people are angry at their own parents. Maybe that anger is justified and maybe it isn’t. They loved Harry Potter way too much and they loved Rowling for creating it and thought she shared all of their views. They see her non-adherence to the cult as a personal betrayal and they are projecting all of their own worst inclinations and rage at their real parents on her. The internet has driven them insane.
 
...radicalised her against DV"

I hope thats an esl style phrasing mistake...
It's not a mistake, it's a deliberate euphemism designed to minimise what he actually did, on the same level as "consent accident". Someone with little knowledge of their relationship might actually think this means that he educated her. They want to rehabilitate her ex to use as a cudgel against her.

They also attempt to hijack a legitimate counter-positition to the "believe women" narrative, which I assume they previously dismissed the ranting of incel chuds: The idea that domestic abuse is often reciprocal in function, if not in form. They do this with the claim Rowling was "controlling" and had poor character, as if this would justify the violence meted out against her.

All of this is attempting to establish a new narrative that Rowling's abuse didn't happen, wasn't as bad as she claims if it did, and she probably deserved it anyway.
 
interesting how JK was hated for years by the right, yet no one was taking photos outside of her home or trying to liable her family, but the side of love and tolerance will do all that and also want her dead
The right wing only really hated the fact that she started retroactively modifying her work to suit modern political agenda. Wizard gandalf is gay, Frizzy know it all is black. They saw it as cheap, silly and prone to backfiring,
It is not the deep cut, you thought it was. The right wing already had its nutbag moment over HP in the 2000s. Everyone was cool with it past 2010.
looking back, the right wing were really fucking cringe back in the 2000s. I suppose it was a needed lesson for right wingers to learn. God nutters ruined the right wing image. It is why the modern right, never lets a god botherer near anything important anymore.
As for this latest round of tranny sperging. Rowling really needs to make an example out of one of these tards. Leftists back the fuck down when the person starts fighting back. The left can out victim you. But they can't out attack you.
 
Back