Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

No, atalker child, no one was paid anything because fiat currency does not have a long-term store of value that will not be eroded by deliberate inflation and only operates as a medium of exchange to facilitate trade in uncommon goods. All debts denominated in it can be effectively cancelled at any time by the sovereign issuer. Enjoy state-backed prison.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Lizard Pope, Haloperidol, Dr. Jaime Reyes and 16 others
PATBROS - Copy.png

With the debt paid and Quasi retiring as owner of Owen A. Forrems, it is well and truly the end of an era. It's nice to know he has an appreciation for the Farms despite his herd's disdain for the Knew Zealand agricultural cooperative. I find it hard to believe he stuck it out and managed to eke out that righteous win. I'm glad the forum is staying around (for now at least).

Hoolie's for Quasi forever.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Lizard Pope, Reckless Starfish, Arkin O'Brien and 28 others
bortherman said:
The reason it went up so such was the initial orders were for what he owed when the judgment was made + any costs associated with retrieving that money + 10%.

Quasi spent a lot getting it reinforced. Every letter to chase up was paid by quasi and could be tacked onto the bill for fatty. Because there were so many costs going on + interest it was getting to the point that by the time fatty or his lawyer had answered, there was another $1k that could be collected and not part of the most recent claim for $x.

Just the attorney sending them a letter every month asking when they are paying up was costing Quasi>pat>nikki>lynn a few hundred bucks + interest. So things like the debtor exam he blew off, fatty (lynn) paid for all parties. the entire lawsuit ended up being funded by SWFA and Robisnsons on Patricks side and Robinsons on Quasi's side.

Quasi didnt lose any money, he lost a lot of hours of his time and the potential for better returns on the money that was locked up. He probaly made a little profit which pales in comparison to the time sink it was.

Pat on the Flipside lost:
~$100k of swfa money
~$83k of Nikki's money paid to Quasi
~$10k at least of Nikki's money for their own lawyers once SFWA had ditched them.

The only people that won were the lawyers and funsters.
Click to expand...
True I forgot he could add the money further spend trying to get paid to the total of Fatrick's debt. With that said then we can calculate the total net profit of Quasi. Considering the judgment was middle of 2021 and he payed a part only in 2023 and the other now in 2024, Quasi won around 20% to 30% in accumulated interest which in 84k means he got a profit of 17k-25k. Which is not bad tbh
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Mourning_Cloak, Dean Pentel, Sexy Senior Citizen and 4 others
bortherman said:
The reason it went up so such was the initial orders were for what he owed when the judgment was made + any costs associated with retrieving that money + 10%.
Click to expand...
The "costs associated" are why I think it went up that much. It's not exactly cheap to try to enforce a California judgment in Wisconsin, or interstate in general. So he drove up the costs a lot by being a bitchy little fag and making it like pulling teeth. That part of the profits went to the lawyers. But Quasi did get 10% interest on it, better than buying into a tech IPO probably. I'm not sure what his ultimate costs were, considering the sheer waste of time this all was and other associated bullshit.

And he gets to walk away undoxed, with his enemy utterly felted. Just speaking for me, I'm impressed. Not many people get to defend a case anonymously and then collect fees for the failed attempt to dox them.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: 6thRanger, Lizard Pope, Onni Kalsarikännit and 30 others
The most amazing feat in all of this was that Quasi was able to kneecap Patrick's entire lawsuit while remaining anonymous, be awarded $32,000, then collect not just the $32k but over $80k, almost sending Patrick to jail in the process, while keeping onaforums running the entire time, while remaining completely anonymous the entire time. Never went on any power trips and is gracefully handing it off. Truly someone to follow for any autists wanting to run controversial forums where people say nigger and talk about kikes and trannies.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: UncleTusky, semitooth, 6thRanger and 83 others
Kirtto said:
I think a lot of the animosity was caused because the stickers notifications as well as different forum cultures. Imagine: You come from original ONA subreddit as a refugee to here and suggest some funny thing to do with Patrick and then all of a sudden your notifications are bombarded with negative stickers and people quote-attacking you for it. That will give you the impression of KF users being unwelcoming retards and mati.

Speaking of bad experiences, let's check in Pat book reviews:

View attachment 5836973

View attachment 5836972

View attachment 5836971
View attachment 5836970
View attachment 5836968
View attachment 5836967

Bonus: Civilian reviewer learned about Patrick Twitter:

View attachment 5836974
Click to expand...
Pat so mad he responded twice to 'Dan'

Edit: not sure the 2nd one is him. Says 'alt account' and the grammatical style is off. Probably just a pest
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240322_020006_Brave.jpg
    Screenshot_20240322_020006_Brave.jpg
    254.1 KB · Views: 65
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Billy Bong, lilypanda, suspended animation and 14 others
I really wish someone on xitter would just ask Patrick earnestly what is he talking about when he says he didn't pay quasi a penny. What does he mean exactly?
We have checks from Nikki payable to Jen for the amount of the judgment. What is that? Who paid who? What is a factual statement Patty is willing to make about this matter?
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Caverlock, internet friend, CansOfCant and 8 others
Nikki and her mother paying Patrick debt makes sense when you realized that the request by Nikki that the pests found on the "Just Answer" criminal law website showed that Fatrick told her a very different version of the story front what really happened. So likely both Nikki and her mom have an alternative version of events that makes Pat look less stupid and incompetent


The Just Answer veracity message hasn't been 100% confirmed but it is pretty much 90%

So we can take it as a proof/evidence of Nikki perspective and understanding of the situation
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Caverlock, bile demon, internet friend and 14 others
It looks like Rick's Airbnb page got taken down. Did their security department finally get off their ass?

Screenshot 2024-03-22 at 10.26.39.jpg

As mentioned many thousands of times before, it's absolutely crazy that he was renting out his hovel while being the most swatted man in America. Like, if you take his assertions at face value and he is being stalked by a murderous cult of terrorists, how the fuck did he think it was okay to do it? I hope a judge asks him that question.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: UncleTusky, semitooth, 6thRanger and 65 others
Red Frida said:
I really wish someone on xitter would just ask Patrick earnestly what is he talking about when he says he didn't pay quasi a penny. What does he mean exactly?
We have checks from Nikki payable to Jen for the amount of the judgment. What is that? Who paid who? What is a factual statement Patty is willing to make about this matter?
Click to expand...
You might overload his piggy brain. Please be more considerate.
1711096766455.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: semitooth, Billy Bong, 6thRanger and 69 others
Kirtto said:
Nikki and her mother paying Patrick debt makes sense when you realized that the request by Nikki that the pests found on the "Just Answer" criminal law website showed that Fatrick told her a very different version of the story front what really happened. So likely both Nikki and her mom have an alternative version of events that makes Pat look less stupid and incompetent


The Just Answer veracity message hasn't been 100% confirmed but it is pretty much 90%

So we can take it as a proof/evidence of Nikki perspective and understanding of the situation
Click to expand...
"Simmons Esq., Expert
Then until you know who they are, there's no point to hire an attorney.

Simmons Esq., Expert
You need to hire a digital investigator to try to figure out who they are."

They would've saved a lot of money if they just asked Yahoo questions before jumping face first into a lawsuit.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Pepo, SpiceyHuman, Caverlock and 11 others
Red Frida said:
"Simmons Esq., Expert
Then until you know who they are, there's no point to hire an attorney.

Simmons Esq., Expert
You need to hire a digital investigator to try to figure out who they are."

They would've saved a lot of money if they just asked Yahoo questions before jumping face first into a lawsuit.
Click to expand...
Well that was Patrick stupidity, this message is probably Nikki finding out about the debt through Patrick and trying and failing to do damage control by getting some online legal counsel
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caverlock, Broadside, Vinluv Handesbukia and 5 others
Red Frida said:
I really wish someone on xitter would just ask Patrick earnestly what is he talking about when he says he didn't pay quasi a penny. What does he mean exactly?
We have checks from Nikki payable to Jen for the amount of the judgment. What is that? Who paid who? What is a factual statement Patty is willing to make about this matter?
Click to expand...
asking pat questions like this is like asking a crazy person to stop hearing voices. He can't help himself. He won't answer in any reasonable way, he'll just "no child" you.

"You know what I mean, child."
"I mean exactly what I say, stalker." Etc.

It's really pathological with him.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: suspended animation, Caverlock, MidUSA and 20 others
Red Frida said:
I really wish someone on xitter would just ask Patrick earnestly what is he talking about when he says he didn't pay quasi a penny. What does he mean exactly?
We have checks from Nikki payable to Jen for the amount of the judgment. What is that? Who paid who? What is a factual statement Patty is willing to make about this matter?
Click to expand...
Yeah, you will never get a straight answer out of him. Thinking Pat is a rational actor and you can corner him with facts and logic is like believing that you can bring some Arabs and some Jews to a discussion table and hash out a peace plan for the Middle East.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Onni Kalsarikännit, ConSluttant, Haloperidol and 18 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back