Smaller dick = harder dick due to less blood needed?

Spiny Rumples

Spiny Rumples

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Dicks are flaccid by default, and on some occasions inflate with blood to get stiff. If a person has more penis by weight (pbw), they will logically need more blood to fill it.

Thus, I hypothesize that people with less pbw will have easier erections, and will be less likely to get erectile dysfuntion (ed).

I took this query to the free thinking Kiwi Farms because I knew that looking it up would get me a lot of very targeted ads.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Aunt Carol and GenericEdgelordSupreme
Solution
Marc
The larger the corpus cavernosum chambers, the harder the heart must work to both saturate/inflate with blood and sustain this level of saturation, in a matter of diminishing returns wherein the mechanisms of circulation simply cannot keep up with the demands of increased cavity space without risking damage to more delicate components of the circulatory system. This principle is why external penile vacuum pumps and cock rings exist.
Sort by date Sort by votes
The larger the corpus cavernosum chambers, the harder the heart must work to both saturate/inflate with blood and sustain this level of saturation, in a matter of diminishing returns wherein the mechanisms of circulation simply cannot keep up with the demands of increased cavity space without risking damage to more delicate components of the circulatory system. This principle is why external penile vacuum pumps and cock rings exist.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Anasa Tristis, eatler, Aunt Carol and 2 others
Upvote 0 Downvote
Solution
You could buy a civilian anti-G suit and rig it to a common air compressor. If there's no blood in your legs, it has to go somewhere, and the penis is anatomically convenient. Worth a try!
switlik-csu-front-left_480x480[1].jpg
 
  • Informative
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Spiny Rumples and eatler
Upvote 0 Downvote
Look, I am so tired of this but science has already researched this topic and larger dicks get just as hard as smaller ones. There is no scientific advantage to having a smaller dick as opposed to a larger one. It is purely a detriment.

If you have a smol pp, you chodes are shit of luck and should probably kill yourselves. You'll never find love or happiness. It was predetermined from birth. Also if you neg-rate this answer, you're just affirming to the world you have a smol pp.
 
  • Political Sperging
  • Informative
Reactions: Spiny Rumples and Doktor Grimm
Upvote 0 Downvote
Aunt Carol said:
You could buy a civilian anti-G suit and rig it to a common air compressor. If there's no blood in your legs, it has to go somewhere, and the penis is anatomically convenient. Worth a try!
View attachment 5838681
Click to expand...
...Couldn't a person just elevate their legs above the rest of their body?

man-in-shorts-holding-leg-behind-back-stuart-mcclymont.jpg

Turkroach Couple said:
The ideal dick should be large enough to impregnate but small enough to deny the woman any pleasure
Click to expand...

Party Hat Wurmple said:
Look, I am so tired of this but science has already researched this topic and larger dicks get just as hard as smaller ones. There is no scientific advantage to having a smaller dick as opposed to a larger one. It is purely a detriment.

If you have a smol pp, you chodes are shit of luck and should probably kill yourselves. You'll never find love or happiness. It was predetermined from birth. Also if you neg-rate this answer, you're just affirming to the world you have a smol pp.
Click to expand...
... I am confused. These two seem to contradict.
 
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Party Hat Wurmple
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back