Elaine attempted to respond to all the allegations against her in one big tweet for the "last time" a few days ago. Emphasis on "attempted".



(
https://archive.fo/WDXvt)
Let's start with this:
>I linked my KF thread which contains my nudes
Lie by omission. Elaine linked the exact page of her thread that contained her nudes and directed Reality to the specific post that the nudes were in (that being the post by
@Shitty Kitty):
(screenshot taken from plugging this HTML export of Elaine's server into this online HTML viewer)
>I didn't know his age at the time
Another lie. Reality directly, explicitly told Elaine he was underaged six minutes prior to the above screencap:
(again, screenshot taken from plugging this HTML export of Elaine's server into this online HTML viewer)
>I still doubt [Reality] is a minor
Either delusional or lying. Take your pick.
(https://kiwifarms.st/threads/the-easy-to-track-username-hall-of-shame.104753/page-51#post-13869447)
>Josh also sent him lewd screen grabs of me posted by the same catfish
While I do agree that pictures of Elaine's face should be considered NSFW due to how uncomfortable it is to look at, I don't think I'd call this "lewd":
(this is literally the only image Josh sent in his exchange with Reality)
(taken from this post)
One claim addressed out of eight and there's already
at least three lies. Bodes well!
Next:
>I didn't know [Torswats] was 17. He told us he was 25.
[citation needed]
Also, who's "us"?
>I have never payed [sic] for a swatting, or sent him anything to obtain free swats.
[citation needed]
>It wasn't even [Torswats] doing the swats that I was involved in [against Kengle, Alia, and Empresa].
Surprise surprise, even more lies!
Here is the swat call against Alia Alexander:
(taken from this post)
The call begins with the swatter saying "
Hello, I just did something really bad and I want to end my life" with a computerized voice.
Here's a small sample of Torswats' published swat calls:
(recorded from this post)
>uses the same script as the Alia swat
>uses the same voice software as the Alia swat
Sounds to me like Torswats was
very involved with these swattings against Elaine's perceived enemies. She claims she was in Alan's DMs, claims she was involved in the swatting of Alia Alexander, but then
lies and says Alan had nothing to do with the Alia swatting when he
very clearly did and expects everyone to believe her baseless assertion that she never solicited Alan for any swattings. Elaine effectively bought the rope, tied the noose, hung it up, put her neck in it, kicked away the chair, and is now trying to argue that the chair just fell over on its own and she's entirely blameless for her own asphyxiation. The only people who would buy this bullshit are mentally handicapped.
Isn't it interesting that the only defense of Elaine's involvement with Torswats that is
actually able to be independently checked turns out to be a lie?
Next up:
>If you have a problem with me being friends with Naught...
Cool "correction" there, admitting to still being friends with this pedophile freak.

(
https://archive.fo/LrggF) (
https://archive.ph/as8xj)
>[Naught was] in Discords with [Josh]
The allegation wasn't that Elaine was just
in a Discord with Naught - it's that she's
friends with him, which she
just confirmed.
>[Naught] was also friends with Josh,
>The Guard Dogs were Josh and Naught's group.
Hm, wonder what
the CWCki has to say about this?

(
a)
LOL, off to a great start. What about
Naught's own article? Surely it will have information about Naught owning Guard Dogs and being bestest friends with Null!

(
a)
There's even a massive disclaimer at the
top of the page about how Naught is a known self-aggrandizing liar
So yeah, Elaine has admitted in plain English to being friends with a lolicon pedophile and
still somehow managed to throw in more lies in the process. How many lies are we at now? Seven? Eight? We're only
3/8ths of the way through the response - what a disaster!
Here's another admission disguised as a correction:
>"Elaine sent 1k to keffals"
>It was misguided...
... and Elaine
still manages to slip in
another lie
>I was the one heavily pushing Keffals to do all this shit
Keffals started his crusade against the forum on
August 9th. On
August 22nd, Elaine was trying to initiate contact with Keffals on Discord, meaning the two
weren't in contact prior.
(post here)
She's just so callous with her lies. She just throws them in for the hell of it, even when they aren't important to the point she's making (that point being that yes, she
did send $1K to a child-grooming tranny). Uhmazin.

Jonahgoldberg / Meticore's group, alternatively called Entropy, Lambright Legion, the Lambright Council, and Niggerchat - a group Alan Filion and Naught were both members of. Group members were posting pictures and gifs of animals being killed and mutilated and crying about "moralfags" who thought they were fucking degenerate for doing so:
(https://kiwifarms.st/threads/elaine...y-inplie-magixel-trollcow.87610/post-17077003)
Here's an easy one:
>No one I know is into DDLG.
>[Zoom's girlfriend] would age regress as a trauma response,
Irrelevant information.
The proof of Elaine defending DDLG ("daddy dom little girl") fetishists is not her putting forward a nuanced stance about dating someone with trauma-induced mental regression like she claims - it is screencaps of her
defending DDLG fetishists and asserting it isn't pedophilia:
>What adults do in the bedroom ain't my business
(taken from this post)
A far cry from her current take of
>I frankly think [DDLG is] comparable to loli in terms of the dangers regarding sexualising minors
If she just changed her mind on the topic in the interim, why not just say that? If the screencaps were fake,
why not just say that? Why does she always default to
lying when ostensibly trying to defend herself???
>[KT's] group [fakes] caps on each other constantly
[citation needed]
>I barely speak to [ClumsyLulz]
Cool, but why has Elaine been so gung-ho about defending ClumsyLulz and calling the below proof against him fake with
no evidence? Is she just taking ClumsyLulz at his word? Why would she do that for some Twitter rando she "barely speaks to"? His word alone is obviously going to be biased since he's the one being accused, and the lack of evidence pointing to the caps being fake tells me that his word is all ClumsyLulz even has.

(taken from this post)
(video from this post)
And why did
the original video containing the proof of ClumsyLulz sexting minors get flagged down (
local archive here) well over a
year after it was uploaded,
only after I brought attention to it in this thread?
Ten lies into this one tweet, do
you trust Elaine's explanation of this?
Do you trust Elaine's explanation of this, either?
>While I am associated with 764, I have never ever encountered pedophiles in my particular friendship clique
>Whoever wrote [all those articles are] taking a few bad apples and labelling [sic] everyone as those things.
764 was created for the distribution of child sexual abuse material. Specifically, it was created by Bradley Cadenhead (a.k.a. Brad764) as a copycat group of another pedophilic sextortion group called Cvlt. If you don't believe me, the name 764 literally comes from the first three digits of Bradley's ZIP code, 76401 (proof
here).

(
https://archive.fo/WOYpo)
Now, what the
fuck kind of group ostensibly dedicated to hunting pedophiles would see this completely and utterly depraved behavior and think "hey, why don't we make our
own group called 764? It'll be fun!

" Imagine if Flamenco came out and said "guys, the Boy Soprano manga I read actually
wasn't about a boy being molested at all - I read a
completely different story called Boy Soprano that's
actually about
hunting down pedophiles! We readers of Boy Soprano are
strongly against pedophilia, and are in reality victims of a media smear campaign! #NotAllBoySopranoReaders" and gave
no evidence at all of this completely separate manga that coincidentally shares its name with a pedophile manga despite ostensibly being against pedophiles. This is
lunacy.
With no evidence to back these claims up, and Elaine's double-digit amount of other lies in the very tweet this statement is a part of (not even to mention Elaine's lack of knowledge that
a completely separate group she was publicly associated with was dealing in sadistic content), I am
perfectly comfortable with saying this story is complete and total horse shit. If she posts evidence that is actually relevant and compelling, then my opinion is open to change, but until then, Elaine "I am associated with 764" Miller has given people reason after reason after reason to actively
distrust her on her word alone, and is owed little to no benefit of the doubt.