Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%

  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%

  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%

  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%

  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%

  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%

  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%
  • Total voters
    2,240
GaryGray said:
Wow he is financials are something. About ~$1000/month income and benefits with $500/month in bills. Leaving a grand total of $500/month for food and an Internet connection. Depsite that he thinks his songs are worth $150k each.
View attachment 5843390
View attachment 5843387
When it comes to his damages this seem to say he is suing for damages that have not happened yet.
View attachment 5843417
View attachment 5843415
Also doxxxxxxxxxing
View attachment 5843408
Now given that courtlistener did not remove his address Acerthorn must sue them next for doxxxxing him.
Click to expand...
How does this retard still owe $40,000 in student loans?
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: koos koets, Broken Cuddles, Not a bee and 4 others
S.C.U.D. said:
Is this a typo? Shouldn't he say "wouldn't" here? Acerthorn, proofread your documents before filing, buddy! I'm starting to think you aren't very good at litigating!
View attachment 5843409

:story:
Click to expand...
archive
picky.jpg


D_Tractor said:
How does this retard still owe $40,000 in student loans?
Click to expand...
You see, when you use student loan money to attempt a smuggling of philipine bananas for purposes of wife material instead of student loan closure, that debt doesn't vanish for some reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, Not a bee and Terry's Templar
Sweeter and Savoury said:
My guess would be that Stabby thinks if he shows how ebil and nasty and mean and nazi and ugly and gross the Farms and Jersh are then the judge will pull a Greer and give him the win just because we are such bad people that to rule in our favor is an evil act in itself no matter what the facts say.

TLDR he's malding about the thread and Jersh telling him to go suck a toad and hoping to prejudice the court so he can get a win at long last.
Click to expand...
What he's trying to do is turn Josh going 'hey your straight upload of Stabby's video may not be fair use, please re-upload with proper commentary' into a conspiracy to violate his copyright. With a really crazy analogy.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Harvey Danger, Pedophobe, Admiral Throbnelius and 4 others
I would like to affirm that I am a melinated individual and have been fired from my bona fide employment as Chief Nigger by @Bruno Powroznik on direct orders from King Null himself.

As I am now unemployed and homeless I have genuine fear for my life from the pepperoni man of Milwaukee. I am asking for $37 in damages and $25 trillion in filing costs.
mindlessobserver said:
I don't want to spoil the ending, but there is a critical step Acerthorn hasn't done yet.
Click to expand...
Apply for Canadian healthcare?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: murph, Admiral Throbnelius, Broken Cuddles and 7 others
  • Like
Reactions: REGENDarySumanai and Marvin
teriyakiburns said:
I assume he understands that the 4th circuit isn't bound by rulings on the 10th circuit?

No?

I'm too drunk to really understand this. I have to assume that Acerthorn is just a fucking retard who has repeatedly failed to state his case. Again.
Click to expand...

What everyone needs to remember is that these proceedings cost old Acer absolutely nothing. He has no income, no hobbies, no job, no friends, nothing to garnish and therefore nothing to lose. He is the very definition of a vexatious litigant.

Just forcing Null to spend some of the legal warchest is a win for Acer. He's a spiteful little goblin who uses the courts to punish people who have the misfortune to cross paths with him.

Really if your new to the thread read the OP, it's chocked full of assburgers, autism and lolsuits and once you read Acer's therapist's notes you'll understand that he sues people simply because he can, because he knows it hurts others financially and because he hates the world and this is the only avenue of control he can exert in the world because he's a lifeless loser who lives in a crack shack that would give cockroaches the shudders and has no hope of that ever changing.

I adore Acerthorn, he's the perfect lolcow.

He's such a spiteful little narcissist who attacks everyone he comes into contact with, remember he STABBED is own father in the face because of slow internet one night, that anything bad that happens to him is pure schadenfreude.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, CEO of Gay, murph and 9 others
Admiral Throbnelius said:
I'm curious. Is there a certain point where you if you get struck down as a vexatious litigant in enough states, you get labeled as a vexatious litigant in all states/on a national level?
Click to expand...
Yes, but it is very rare.

In re Martin-Trigona, 573 F. Supp. 1245 (D. Conn. 1983). This is on the federal level, though, not state courts.
Low IQ Doctor said:
Anyone with any actual legal acumen want to comment on his stupid unpublished vs published argument? It reads like the sovereign citizen distinction between travelling and driving. Also, doesn't youtube have you click a button literally called "publish" to make a video public?
Click to expand...
It is my opinion that whether published or unpublished, and it is a distinction made in a fair use analysis, posting something of your own volition to YouTube is an implicit license to others to comment on it. An illustrative case would be Hughes v. Benjamin, 437 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) (involving a copyright spat between Carl Benjamin and Akila Hughes in which Benjamin was awarded attorney fees after winning the case).

It is customary and well known to people who aren't mentally retarded turkey gobblers that people often respond to YouTube videos with commentary. It is on the level of suing someone because they quoted your post in a forum.

I haven't looked at the re-uploaded video, so I can't say whether or not the commentary is sufficient to constitute a fair use, but as I have said repeatedly, copying the entirety of a work, with or without comment, is treacherous ground.

And it actually might not be an implicit license. The Terms of Service the Wereturkey agreed to by using the service state explicitly:

Licence to YouTube​

By providing Content to the Service, you grant to YouTube a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, transferable, sublicensable licence to use that Content (including to reproduce, distribute, modify, display and perform it) for the purpose of operating, promoting, and improving the Service.

Licence to Other Users​

You also grant each other user of the Service a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free licence to access your Content through the Service, and to use that Content (including to reproduce, distribute, modify, display, and perform it) only as enabled by a feature of the Service.
Click to expand...
So yeah there's that.

So he can call them "unpublished" all he likes, and perhaps they were at the time of his registration (and otherwise his registration is fraudulent), but uploading them to a service where the Terms of Service explicitly grants a license to use the uploaded content puts the lie to that claim.

I have some other thoughts about that but since they might inadvertently help Mr. Stabby, I'm keeping those to myself.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Harvey Danger, Coo Coo Bird, murph and 18 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back