Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 156 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.3%

  • Total voters
    465
Jesus Russ, this is big boy court. "My not-lawyers didn't give me free advice" is personally infuriating.
It ain't just that either, he also doesn't have to answer motions if his not-lawyers don't answer for him.
1711466174034.png
 
So he wants the courts to consider him too incompetent to follow legal proceedings, but he's also telling the courts he thought he knew the legal proceedings well enough to make assumptions about how his motions were affecting the deadlines.

Makes sense to me, what's your excuse?
 
I hope that immediately following this call the judge dismisses with prejudice for failure to prosecute because he can't understand a word Russ says.
If Russ is smart, he'll use these 8 days to get a lawyer to speak for him. That said, he has had since December 5th (3 months and 21 days) to get them and failed, so I'm not holding onto hope
 
Hopefully zero
Is there any law saying the public can't listen in? These instructions are publicly posted, and in the days before telephones these things would happen inside a public court room. (Or in chambers, or at the bench)

Obviously just to listen in, not to say anything or disrupt.
 
What would be Utah's possible response to this be? Will anything submitted to Utah after the transfer be recorded but ignored?

I don't think it will.
will there be a transcription at least?

Is there any law saying the public can't listen in? These instructions are publicly posted, and in the days before telephones these things would happen inside a public court room. (Or in chambers, or at the bench)

Obviously just to listen in, not to say anything or disrupt.
If someone does get in could we get a recording?
 
  • Like
Reactions: koos koets
If Russ is smart, he'll use these 8 days to get a lawyer to speak for him. That said, he has had since December 5th (3 months and 21 days) to get them and failed, so I'm not holding onto hope
Russ isn't smart. And hiring lawyers cuts deeply into his hookers and brothel building fund. Now I would not rule out Russ hiring a hooker to speak for him on the call.

That "Dog ate my homework" pleading to a court that no longer is hearing the case is superb. It has everything. In it Russ openly admits he was negligent, incompetent and ignored the one warning from his former layers that filing a Stay was stupid and unlikely to be granted. Also didn't he blow the scheduling conference deadlines and the order at least once Before he filed the stay?

I wonder what if anything he will file in Florida?
 
Is there any law saying the public can't listen in? These instructions are publicly posted, and in the days before telephones these things would happen inside a public court room. (Or in chambers, or at the bench)
These instructions were stated to be for the lawyers of the parties. If you are aware that it is not in breach of any court rules or laws to listen in, feel free. I am not aware, and aware that it is in breach of said rules or laws in certain jurisdictions. I could find nothing about it on the court website itself.

Anyway, this is something I found funny from Russ' motion
Screenshot 2024-03-26 174335.png
1. HE DIDN'T EVEN USE THE EXTRA 48 DAYS TO TRY AND GET THE MONEY! He was literally just sitting on his ass and doing fuck all
2. He is complaining about "frivolous" motions regarding filing dates when the court itself found that he was in breach of those dates. LMAO
What would be Utah's possible response to this be? Will anything submitted to Utah after the transfer be recorded but ignored?
Nothing, presumingly, if not a blanket denial for lack of jurisdiction. But, yes, it will be recorded, but most likely ignored, as the case is considered closed.
will there be a transcription at least?
I believe they'd have to pay for a transcriber if they wanted one. They are automatic only in in person hearings, as I understand it (and even not all). Then again, this Magistrate Judge does (audio) record "All proceedings" before him, so I might have initially been wrong. We'll see.
Now I would not rule out Russ hiring a hooker to speak for him on the call.
That'd be hilarious, but I don't think she legally can, can she?
Also didn't he blow the scheduling conference deadlines and the order at least once Before he filed the stay?
Yes
 
What would be Utah's possible response to this be? Will anything submitted to Utah after the transfer be recorded but ignored?


will there be a transcription at least?


If someone does get in could we get a recording?
Do Not Attempt to Call in or Record the Call! Doing so could hurt Null. Just don't touch it.
 
1. HE DIDN'T EVEN USE THE EXTRA 48 DAYS TO TRY AND GET THE MONEY!
I would like to formally apologize for thinking Russ was gaming the system for extra time even if the motion for a 90 day stay was denied. I realize now Russ is more retarded than I initially thought possible.
 
Back