Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

It's because most modern women are evil.
It's a translation problem. They take manhood and think men are powerful because of a trait that has little to do with the actual reason -- let's say, aggressiveness. So some women think being more aggressive will lead them to power. They are wrong, then don't get what they want and became frustrated. Everyone hurts.
 
It's a translation problem. They take manhood and think men are powerful because of a trait that has little to do with the actual reason -- let's say, aggressiveness. So some women think being more aggressive will lead them to power. They are wrong, then don't get what they want and became frustrated. Everyone hurts.

Women don't understand that men have power for the same reason women have boobs. It attracts the opposite sex. And that's why they fail to get it - it's simply not what they need to do to make men like them. Women who think men ought to be attracted to status and accomplishments are like men who think women should be attracted to cross-dressing males in heavy makeup.
 
Women don't understand that men have power for the same reason women have boobs. It attracts the opposite sex. And that's why they fail to get it - it's simply not what they need to do to make men like them. Women who think men ought to be attracted to status and accomplishments are like men who think women should be attracted to cross-dressing males in heavy makeup.
Modern women are perfectly content with stripping men of any power they have. Either because in their mind, social power is irrelevant or they just like their advantageous position(which they will never acknowledge). When speaking and interacting with modern women and feminism you are interacting with a system of lies and delusions which permeate everything and that you have no recourse against.
 
Most modern women in the entertainment industry are evil.

A good example of evil women behavior is a mid to late 30's woman who had a very active sexual history but now lives as an unwanted used up cat-owning childless woman. Just because she made mistakes in her own life, she sabotages women younger than her by promoting the same lifestyle she had.

Another one is normal size women promoting the fat acceptance ideology to other women (eg eliminating their competition). That is fucking evil.

What are some examples of men sabotaging men? Would a man promoting blue pill ideology to another man ("just be yourself", she's not interested in you because of your personality not your looks, life is a disney movie, etc) be considered the male equivalent of sabotage?
 
It's a translation problem. They take manhood and think men are powerful because of a trait that has little to do with the actual reason -- let's say, aggressiveness. So some women think being more aggressive will lead them to power. They are wrong, then don't get what they want and became frustrated. Everyone hurts.
Throughout history the most powerful women were ones who saw their femininity as a strength and used it to their advantage. There was a popular saying in Ancient Rome that; "While Augustus may rule Rome his wife Livia rules Augustus." There was also women like Abigail Adams who worked as her husband, President John Adams, adviser and was there to help him and offer him her advice on matters of the time. Now though, women have an obsession with getting power for the sake of it and I find it very unsettling. Wanting power for the sake of it isn't empowering. It is the makings of a tyrant.
 
Screenshot_20240326_203249_Brave.jpg
>random w*men get attacked
>seems to be a black man
>w*man refuses to acknowledge it
>will continue to vote for soft of crime DAs
 
A pick-me girl is a girl who seeks male validation by indirectly or directly insinuating that she is “not like the other girls.” Basically a female version of a simp.
So, the female version of the simp is the slut, not the pick-me. This is because women are the gatekeepers of sex while men are the gatekeepers of relationships/commitment. Simps give their attention/affection/commitment away for cheap or free, while sluts give away sex for cheap or free. The way relationships are supposed to work is that the man is supposed to remain attractive enough that his woman wants to have sex with him, while she puts enough effort into the relationship for him to want to continue to commit his resources to her.

This is effectively the old school Red Pill concept of "Alpha" behaviors and "Beta" behaviors, or better stated, Attractive behaviors and Comfort behaviors, or as hoe_math calls them Bad Boy and Good Boy. The key for men is having both behaviors. And Attractive is the split of Rule 1 - Be Attractive, in other words don't be fat, look after your hygine, get reasonably fit, dress well and Rule 2 - Don't Be Unattractive, don't be needy, don't be validation seeking, etc. and is the key to being fuckable.

At the end of the day, while a man has to be fuckable, a woman has to demonstrate that she's more than just fuckable, and brothers let me tell you, it's bleak out there.
 
Last edited:
So, the female version of the simp is the slut, not the pick-me.
Unsure women have true simps, like men do. I have yet to see any significant amount of women wasting their money on virtual eboys and their onlyfans or something.
The sad truth is unfucked, horny men are particularly pathetic when it comes to female attention and they are a HUGE issue for normal men, as they shower women with money, attention and gifts, not for sex, but just for some attention, which in turn makes normal men have to work far harder to get laid.
Which is bad. Ideally these dudes would fuck off and keep masturbating to Youporn or something, and stopping shitting up the sex having scene for other men.
 
Unsure women have true simps, like men do. I have yet to see any significant amount of women wasting their money on virtual eboys and their onlyfans or something.
The sad truth is unfucked, horny men are particularly pathetic when it comes to female attention and they are a HUGE issue for normal men, as they shower women with money, attention and gifts, not for sex, but just for some attention, which in turn makes normal men have to work far harder to get laid.
Which is bad. Ideally these dudes would fuck off and keep masturbating to Youporn or something, and stopping shitting up the sex having scene for other men.
I think you spelled it out without noticing it - not a mirror image but more like a film negative of it.

If you swing by FDS or some other place where obviously unhappy women gather, you'll notice their hatred for pickmeshas (their term for pick-mes) and sometimes follow up with how pick-mes are bringing everyone else down. It's just a rehash of slut shaming directed at a different demographic but underlying sentiment is the same.
 
Unsure women have true simps, like men do. I have yet to see any significant amount of women wasting their money on virtual eboys and their onlyfans or something.
Male and Female sexuality is different, so it's not going to be a 1-for-1. It's more the concept of giving away what you're supposed to be gatekeeping in exchange for the other sex wants. Simps give away their resources, and more importantly, the attention, affection, and validation that women want, while getting little or nothing sexual in return. Sluts are just the flip side, giving away sex and then not getting the relationship/commitment part in exchange. The manifestation isn't going to be the same, see all the sluts wondering why Chad will fuck the shit out of them, but then not commit. All the simp has are his resources, but those won't get him sex, similarly, all the slut has is sex, but that doesn't get her relationships and commitment. Chad has options, so he's going to pick a woman who brings more to the table than her holes, just like a woman isn't going to pick a man who brings nothing but resources, unless she has to. Or she'll "Alpha fucks, Beta bucks," but that's just taking what a simp offers for free and then she fucks the guys she's actually attracted to.

Here's the thing, simps can shower women in as much money as they want, she's still going to fuck the guys she finds attractive. If she finds you attractive, she'll make it easy for you, the simps don't figure into that, because they don't count to her. You can't negotiate actual desire.
 
Simps give away their resources, and more importantly, the attention, affection, and validation that women want, while getting little or nothing sexual in return.
Well they should stop. Chicks need to be starved of such freebies.
If you want money you better provide something, in RL, not online.
No ifs and buts.
My empathy for these man is almost inexistant. Sometimes you just can't fuck. I've had a pause of almost 5 yrs after a particularly bad relationship. Happens, that doesn't mean I ever humiliated myself in front of a woman.
That's pathetic and unmanly and it simply needs to stop.
To be even more clear, even the money for sex thing is bad.
Ideally, you wanna fuck for free, and for pleasure. You give pleasure, receive pleasure in return, both sides happy.
You should not pay for sex 99.99% of the cases, and you should never transfer wealth towards women.
 
Throughout history the most powerful women were ones who saw their femininity as a strength and used it to their advantage. There was a popular saying in Ancient Rome that; "While Augustus may rule Rome his wife Livia rules Augustus." There was also women like Abigail Adams who worked as her husband, President John Adams, adviser and was there to help him and offer him her advice on matters of the time. Now though, women have an obsession with getting power for the sake of it and I find it very unsettling. Wanting power for the sake of it isn't empowering. It is the makings of a tyrant.
Feminists never mention Theodora because they don't like that she was attached to a man (Justinian)
 
Well they should stop. Chicks need to be starved of such freebies.
If you want money you better provide something, in RL, not online.
No ifs and buts.
My empathy for these man is almost inexistant. Sometimes you just can't fuck. I've had a pause of almost 5 yrs after a particularly bad relationship. Happens, that doesn't mean I ever humiliated myself in front of a woman.
That's pathetic and unmanly and it simply needs to stop.
To be even more clear, even the money for sex thing is bad.
Ideally, you wanna fuck for free, and for pleasure. You give pleasure, receive pleasure in return, both sides happy.
You should not pay for sex 99.99% of the cases, and you should never transfer wealth towards women.
You're right, they should stop, for the same reason women should stop spreading their legs for every chad out there, it's distorted the sexual marketplace to the point it's massively fucked. It's State of Nature, which is women competing over the top 20% of men and pretending the rest don't exist. The whole genius of traditional values in Western culture was that it was a society-wide implicitly enforced assortative mating. The people around you would try to steer the 6 to 6s and the 7s to 7s and so on and so forth.

Simps effect the market in the sense that women don't have to work for attention, affection, and validation, like sluts mean that attractive men don't have to provide resources/"comfort." They both fuck the market up. Especially since women tend to get stuck on their highest setting/hottest guy that's fucked them. Chad Thundercock slumpbusting with a 3 or 4 or whatever could potentially fuck up her perception of her value.

Only Fans only exists because there's a market for it, sadly it's easier to just pay an e-thot than do the work to improve your relationship. Conversely, at least in America, the bar has never been lower for men and if you're willing to put in the work it's not hard to become attractive as a man. If you're willing to do the work.
 
You're right, they should stop, for the same reason women should stop spreading their legs for every chad out there
As a promiscuous pussy enjoyer, I don't really have much against chad getting pussy, it's the way of nature.
If you're pussy starved, I suggest you try improving, like getting some muscles, being clean and learning how to talk to women without scaring them away. If you fail, masturbate.
Women basically always gatekept sex. And there is no sexual redistribution that equitable where ugly incels get high quality pussy. Even in patriarchal societies, you have to have something, either the family, or the looks, or the money. If you have nothing, you'll get nothing.
Also, I see homeless people with girlfriends all the time. Sure they're on the same level basically, dirty etc., but such is life.
Inceldom is a curse on masculinity and should be shunned. Men need to learn stoicism and understand that pussy is not the most important thing in life.
Even if we somehow miraculously scored a patriarchy, you think the elite men ruling it will give incel types any pussy? Obviously, not.
 
Generally, although every now and then you run into the "I can fix him" types. I think the best and hardest thing I read about this was Delicious Taco's The Pussy. Brilliant writer and I don't think I've ever read anything that made me feel distilled existential despair quite like it, if that's the term for it. Highly recommend, unless you're depressed or down.
 
A good example of evil women behavior is a mid to late 30's woman who had a very active sexual history but now lives as an unwanted used up cat-owning childless woman. Just because she made mistakes in her own life, she sabotages women younger than her by promoting the same lifestyle she had.

Another one is normal size women promoting the fat acceptance ideology to other women (eg eliminating their competition). That is fucking evil.
I don't think either is particularly evil since you have to be pretty retarded to take relationship advice from unmarried people in their 30s. And as far as fat acceptance goes, most faties know deep down that they are destroying their body and are miserable. The fat acceptance movement is just covering in public.
 
Back