Furry Fandom and Drama General

If you read the court documents it's pretty funny, they're arguing that the plastic horse dicks are artistic sculptures and therefore under some special copyright law.

Imagine being a 60 year old judge and reading this shit:

1711582220158.png
 
I am curious, and so I guess I'll have to be the one(unless someone beats me too it)

Ethics in gay furryfag dildo designs:
Crackers the Cockatrice
View attachment 5854308
vs
Asmodeus

View attachment 5854309

Fenrir The Wolf Dragon
View attachment 5854310
vs
Asteroth
View attachment 5854313

I regretted my Decision after Count 4, the site literally stopped letting me upload horrific silicon phalluses after Count 7 and then rolled back my post to the first two when I reloaded. Here is just the rest:
these look sorta similar but not really actionable

but yeah iirc Bad Dragon has some more already known reasons why they want to stay far away from discovery, relating to previous mentions about how they got their dog dongs looking so realistic
 
Remember, this isn't just "the jury will have to compare these two animal-themed dildos." One of the defenses for any non-fantasy animal designs used will be "we used real animal penises as reference, which are un-copyrightable." Which means that, as evidence, photographs of real animal penises will likely be submitted. Possibly from multiple angles, in order firmly establish that they're based on reality.

Hell, for the fantasy animals like dragons they may say "it is a common feature in fantasy art for dragon cocks to have x, y, and z feature we used," which would involve the submission of dragon bestiality pornography as evidence in order to prove it, and since the defense would likely be that it's common for them to look like that, they'll need to submit enough of it to establish just how common it is.

May God have mercy on the souls of these jurors, and none for the people putting them through this.
 
Everyone in this case should demand that it be a public trial. This has to be livestreamed to the largest amount of platforms possible. This should be televised on C-SPAN. I want to see defence attorneys arguing the mathematics behind a dog knot that make it sufficiently original from the plaintiff's products. I want to see witnesses explain to an 60-year-old judge who uses the Internet twice a year how their prostate/g-spot is stimulated by Bad Dragon versus SinSaint products.
Fuck that, I want the Supreme Court to rule on this. I want Clarence Thomas to look at the dog dildos and make US case law on what is and isn't a proper rubber dog dick
 
MOD EDIT:
Welcome to another Animal Control feature! Today's sticker is :feels:. If you just want to make a post about how much you hate furries and the fact they disgust you, as does everyone, consider just hitting the :feels: reaction for this post instead.
:feels:
"Yur honor I'd like to file an amicus brief in this case, my wife used these products":really:
 
MOD EDIT:
Welcome to another Animal Control feature! Today's sticker is :feels:. If you just want to make a post about how much you hate furries and the fact they disgust you, as does everyone, consider just hitting the :feels: reaction for this post instead.



Who's ready for a good ole degenerate lolsuit slapfight?
(ty to the fren who brought this to my attention BTW, good find)

View attachment 5853781
https://bsky.app/profile/orcishlaw.bsky.social/post/3kod23atdx42x (sign in required to view)

Court Docs: https://www.courtlistener.com/docke...rprises-incorporated-v-sinsaint-incorporated/


Bad Dragon vs. SinSaint, and some light-making of the situation has already begun:

TLDR; "N-no! You-you can't just rip off MY animal dildos because... BECAUSE YOU JUST CAN'T OKAY!?!"
If by some miralce this goes to trial and gets livestramed, it would be the perfect case for a non-practicing lawyer to cover on his show about balldo's, just sayin.
 
Back