Christopher Vito Gesualdi / Vito / Vaedophile / CringleJingle / Co-Host of the "The Biggest Problem in the Universe" Reboot - Self-admitted paedophile, least funny comedian, lolicon artist, shotacon consumer, spousal abuser, snuff distributor and pet of Dick "Juju the cow" Masterson. Follows accounts making CGI of teenagers and generates AI images of lolicon hentai covers.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Will physical copies of the fat nonce book be delivered by Halloween (Year 2025 edition)?

  • YES. He will fulfill his promises and Eric July will be epically lynched!

    Votes: 11 3.9%
  • NO. Also he is fat.

    Votes: 270 96.1%

  • Total voters
    281
Why has no one ever trolled this guy to the same extent they do Cyrax? He genuinely deserves it.
Because the worthless fat pig would only get off on the attention. Cyrax gets trolled because he freaks out in spectacular fashion every time, but Vito would just use it to sympathy bait to his handful of fans and talk about what a misunderstood genius he is.
Doesn't this fat fuck claim to be a comedian? You'd think he'd understand the difference between an obvious joke that chastises people's increasing tolerance for dystopian shit if it comes with a free Funko Pop and explicitly stating you are going to fuck kids with no context or punchline.

Let's use a real comedian to help Vito understand. Here's a classic from everyone's favourite, Norm MacDonald (RIP):
"Did you hear Michael Jackson's having a kid? Apparently if it's a girl he's going to call it Janet, and if it's a boy he's going to have sex with it."

The Vito Gesualdi version:
"Did you hear Michael Jackson's having a kid? I'm going to have sex with it."

(ETA: I had to punch the Vito joke down a bit because it still had too much structure)
 
Last edited:
Old clip, but good for context on why greasy faggot should be mocked and laughed at.

1711377311915.png

Sweet! They even gave me credit for my edit but misspelled my username as "AltisticRight." Must be a busted keyboard. Happens to the best of us!
 
I don't care to listen to Vito, my only question is, is it one of those "lol I got you guys, the movie isn't that bad" white night clickbait videos or is it genuinely unfavourable to the film?

I ask because both outcomes are very unoriginal especially when the film is 8 years old now. On one hand, the bait and switch shit has been done to death with plenty of these anti-anti-sjw guys, so he's not treading any new ground here. Then on the other hand... It's a shite film, we've known it's shite for almost 8 years. So what else is there to say? Most people have moved on to the new shite Ghostbuster film... Great work there Vaedo.

I've got a review for you, how about a scathing anti-review bait and switch of the merits of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. Or, how about instead of putting effort into this retarded venture and asking online for free help in editing, you put out your piece of shit book you fat cunt.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Humongous Faggotous
I see his movie reviews are about as timely as his comic releases.
Wow, only 5 8 years behind everyone else!
Aha, you fools. 7D chess master Vito is ahead of you. See, he's released this a week late of the newest Ghostbusters movie coming out. Sure, they have absolutely nothing in common outside of a title, but this was all calculated to get eleventy billion views through the algorithm.

Wait, he's only got 4k views? Surely the view counter must be froze... right?
 
my only question is, is it one of those "lol I got you guys, the movie isn't that bad" white night clickbait videos or is it genuinely unfavourable to the film?
I dropped out at 5 minutes (just after the Superkiller plug btw) but no: it seems to really be a negative review of a nearly decade-old movie that everyone already agreed wasn't very good and moved on. His excuse for the timing is because the new Ghostbusters movie just came out.

From what little I watched my biggest takeaway is how unbelievably generic his writing and delivery is. It honest-to-God feels like what you would get if you AI-generated a Ghostbusters 2016 review after feeding in all the negative reviews from the usual grifting suspects. There is absolutely no reason why this video needed to be made, as always Vito has nothing interesting or original to say.
 
I dropped out at 5 minutes (just after the Superkiller plug btw) but no: it seems to really be a negative review of a nearly decade-old movie that everyone already agreed wasn't very good and moved on. His excuse for the timing is because the new Ghostbusters movie just came out.

From what little I watched my biggest takeaway is how unbelievably generic his writing and delivery is. It honest-to-God feels like what you would get if you AI-generated a Ghostbusters 2016 review after feeding in all the negative reviews from the usual grifting suspects. There is absolutely no reason why this video needed to be made, as always Vito has nothing interesting or original to say.
I wonder how many jokes he just stole from other people.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Harm
>I'm not joking, I'm coming for your children, I cannot stop myself
>It's funny when the kid gets raped
>I will fuck your kids
>Vedo, stop talking about raping children
>WAHHH I AM BEING PERSECUTED BY LIES AND DEFAMATION DID YOU KNOW I WAS JUST JOKING FOR REAL FOR SURE

Neck, you fat nonce.
He keeps insisting it was only one tweet, despite the fact that he brings up pedophilia all the time. To the point where when he was mentioned on a true crime podcast, it was because he linked one of the hosts to a story about a pedophile.
 
I managed to listen to exactly 59 seconds of that video before I got sick of hearing a fat pedophile talk. Here's my takeaway.

Good: Good call on just voicing over footage, no one wants to see Vito's grotesque body.
Bad: Nasally pedophile voice and boring subject matter.

Final Review: He called a nearly a decade old movie 'soulless' which I thought was funny because the review was about as cookie cutter as any other snarky movie review I've seen. Vito doesn't have a soul either because he's a pedophile. He also said that the directors shouldn't show their faces in public. I found that interesting because Vito should also not show his face in public because he is ugly and also a pedophile.

Final Score: KYS out of 10
 
His excuse for the timing is because the new Ghostbusters movie just came out.
See, this could work, but only if he made it a double feature reviewing the newest one along side the bad one. Instead Vito has made a video that every other media critic YouTuber has already made but in a timely manner.
they are his best performing content
That's pretty sad but also very likely true.
Screenshot_20240327_190608_Chrome.jpg
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Oliver Onions
There is absolutely no reason why this video needed to be made, as always Vito has nothing interesting or original to say.
True that. Vaedo also busted out the dumb googley eyes that clickbait streamers use for those cookie cutter thumbnails you can’t help but be bombarded with across youtube. Even the thumbnail is boring, the content must be gutter trash, thanks to those who were able to stand watching it & summarizing for the thread.
 
Back