Furry Fandom and Drama General

How is shoving that up your rectum not considered a torture/sudoku method?

Also, if the owner of BD wasn't a faggot himself I would applaud him for not only making thousands of dollars from dumb furries but also for selling them things that will cause them to have to wear diapers by age 35.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cat Phuckers, Broken Cuddles, Kaktus Kompot and 6 others
mindlessobserver said:
I just busted out laughing and my coworker wanted to know what was so funny on my phone.

How do I explain to them I had an image of a lawyer in a court room dual wielding dog penis dildos and asking a jury if they can tell the difference between the two.
Click to expand...
When I find myself in similar situations, I disclose that the nature of what I'm laughing at is not safe for work (or life in general.) I then ask if they're certain they want to know to which I reply "I warned you." when they say 'Yes.' I then set the context, before telling them what reply got me laughing. In this case I'd plainly say:

"A company that makes sex toys in the shapes of animal penises is suing another company for stealing their designs. They want a jury trial to subject people to their degeneracy. A forum user wanted to see this funny moment from a different court case comparing two cups of pudding applied to this case where the judge holds up two sex toys and asks a jury if they can see the difference. Imagining the outlandish nature of a judge dual wielding sex toys in the shapes of dog penises made me laugh."

Tldr: Make your coworker consent to the tarnishing of his soul.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Cat Phuckers, Essay2414778, Broken Cuddles and 9 others
TheShedCollector said:
An Arizona jury might just make a decision based on fucking over these degenerate fuckpigs. I have faith that lulz will ensure, even if the likelihood is a boring, predictable out of court settlement with non disclosure all round.

But I'm optimistic. This could be fun.
Click to expand...
It'd be funny if the jury awarded BD a dollar and said "That's for scarring us for life you sick freaks."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cat Phuckers and Broken Cuddles
xXthrowawayaccountXx said:
Here's a question to keep you up at night:

when they make these, how deeply do they study and reference real life?
Click to expand...
That sounds like a question for the jury. What are the processes both companies use as to how they make these animal penis models? This can help prove or disprove whether the defending party copied the plaintiff or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cat Phuckers and Kane Lives
Can animal cocks be patented or licensed? I would assume that "cock with a dog's knot on it" would not be considered a novel invention as anyone sufficiently deviant could come up with the design without a prior reference.
 
Can I take a moment how some of these lawlyears, I mean, lawyers take years to study the American law, perhaps in the meagre chance to solve criminal cases or involve things related to blue or even white collar crime. And yet they find themselves either prosecuting or serving as an attorney for... a sex toy company.

Can you imagine being said lawyer, representing the company in this case? Did you have to study whatever many years of your life just to represent this thing? Could have been worse I guess!
Maybe they could feel like a real life Saul Goodman, only more tame and less "strange". Perhaps it would be stranger if Christian Weston Chandler, Phil Burnell and Bossman Jack were involved in this together. Then you could think "Am I in a fucking TV show right now?????"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cat Phuckers
BelUwUga said:
SinSaint might have counsel but I'm spotting what seems like a rookie error. Saying you'll take some down for redesign is easily taken as an admission you were infringing the copyrights and knew you were infringing them. You either say "fuck you, we're not infringing, these listings stay up" or you extremely carefully negotiate a way to remove the listings without making any admission of wrongdoing. Neither one prevents a lawsuit but they are more defensible. At least for any of the redesigns it's probably now a matter of determining how much they owe BD. If it's a forgone conclusion they're infringing with one it is easier to argue they are infringing with all of them.
Click to expand...
Evidence of subsequent remedial measures is not admissible to prove negligence or culpability.
 
How likely is it that Bad Dragon is doing this to get some sweet advertising? It's been ages since I've even remembered their existence, even on 4chan where people jokingly talk about sending people these dildos or what have you.
As with everything with furries, the end results will be disappointing, gay and someone will likely end up with a bleeding asshole and/or aids. As funny as the thought of the jury and the judge being educated on the finer points of dog penis molds is, I doubt we will actually get any good content from this. I bet something like this isn't even rare, we just don't hear about every degenerate niche case going to court.
 
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Cat Phuckers, Essay2414778, goyberg and 2 others
TyrasGuard said:
How is shoving that up your rectum not considered a torture/sudoku method?

Also, if the owner of BD wasn't a faggot himself I would applaud him for not only making thousands of dollars from dumb furries but also for selling them things that will cause them to have to wear diapers by age 35.
Click to expand...

Bad news fren. They gonna wear diapers anyway.

Betonhaus said:
Can animal cocks be patented or licensed? I would assume that "cock with a dog's knot on it" would not be considered a novel invention as anyone sufficiently deviant could come up with the design without a prior reference.
Click to expand...

I would anticipate an industrial design argument if it gets that far. "See where the bulb on this dogknot occurs at 21.3mm from the base? That's clearly ours... and if you look over here at the defendants dogknot... identical" says the balding professor type with a straight face and digital caliper.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Cat Phuckers, goyberg, Coo Coo Bird and 5 others
30+GameOvers said:
How likely is it that Bad Dragon is doing this to get some sweet advertising? It's been ages since I've even remembered their existence, even on 4chan where people jokingly talk about sending people these dildos or what have you.
As with everything with furries, the end results will be disappointing, gay and someone will likely end up with a bleeding asshole and/or aids. As funny as the thought of the jury and the judge being educated on the finer points of dog penis molds is, I doubt we will actually get any good content from this. I bet something like this isn't even rare, we just don't hear about every degenerate niche case going to court.
Click to expand...

not at all, to my knowledge they still max out their queue within hours of it opening. And if they were really desperate to make money they'd had probably abandoned the queue fake scarcity system by now.

plus they own the second biggest furry image site e621 and a bunch of other weird shit.

They are still the boss nigger of furry dildos, 99% sure this is just them trying to assert control over someone they feel are stepping on their toes for some reason or the owner pissed them off somehow.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Cat Phuckers, Broken Cuddles, goyberg and 4 others
Google.com said:
not at all, to my knowledge they still max out their queue within hours of it opening. And if they were really desperate to make money they'd had probably abandoned the queue fake scarcity system by now.

plus they own the second biggest furry image site e621 and a bunch of other weird shit.

They are still the boss nigger of furry dildos, 99% sure this is just them trying to assert control over someone they feel are stepping on their toes for some reason or the owner pissed them off somehow.
Click to expand...
I didn't know they actually owned e621. I guess they got a monopoly on furry empire, then. I guess the posters saying they want to bankrupt the competition might be true, then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: emergenigger and Cat Phuckers
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back