- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
Remember the ABBA song "Does your mother know?" I feel like the modern equivalent is "Do your children know?"
Bad webcomics
- Thread starter wagglyplacebo
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2022
I'm too lazy to post it, but pizzacake posted a comic mildly criticizing the Canadian healthcare system and made redditors screech about how it's a conservative dog whistle and how bad it is for her to do that etc etc etc. Never change, reddit.
I can't believe I'm saying this but, compared to her other comics, I actually don't hate this one. The horny simps suck but I thought the joke was kind of amusing and the facial expressions didn't look like shit for once.
...And then I read this shit. Wtf? Bad art aside, I can't articulate how weird it is to be making comics of yourself getting fucked by another man and your husband being okay with it and then joining in. I'm guessing since she's a redditor though, her husband is a literal cuck and would be okay with this really happening.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Every single redditor is not only a cuck but also something even worse than a cuck.
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2019
It's like if an artist from WikiHow made a porn comic. It's so fucking funny though that the husband somehow pinpoints her location and is not only okay with being cucked, he is so beyond okay with it in fact, that he actually joins in. No question at all, not a moment of anger or discomfort.
Dude this bitch even sucks at making porn comics
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
This is the most unbelievable part of the comic.
Who the fuck actually remembers a phone number in 2024 anyway? Immersion ruined.
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2019
I also very much enjoy the final panel where it looks like he is drunk out of his mind and letting out a massive belch. Quite erotic!
Tip: if you are trying to make porn not look retarded and like shit you should first learn to draw
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2016
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2015
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2024
Conspiracy Mawile
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2023
Maybe you just lose your mind after 24 years of webcomic shenanigans?
Not sure if Ishida is just insane, in the last terminal stage of social media-addiction, a grifter or just doesn't give a shit anymore. His political worldview seems to be completely dictated by the algorithm.
Not sure if Ishida is just insane, in the last terminal stage of social media-addiction, a grifter or just doesn't give a shit anymore. His political worldview seems to be completely dictated by the algorithm.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
For some reason when you fuck with someone's income by getting them knocked off Patreon because you criticized troons, it doesn't make them hate troons less.
Arthur Morgan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
If not, the kids at school will make sure they know. Alongside the nudes their mother has posted.
He lost his mind more than a decade ago. Around 2007 he got really into doing political comics and a lot of it was dumb but fun, until he got into feminism and made it clear he had no idea what the fuck was going on. That was especially funny because he was convinced all women who do porn or BDSM are being raped and have no ability to consent, which got him into a lot of trouble with feminists who hated him for implying they're basically children, not helped that he used children to represent them.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Porn is a vicious exploitative industry and while it's usually not outright rape, they get as far to the line with all the "barely legal" shit by targeting people whose brains literally aren't fully developed. I'm not saying raise AoC above 18, because otherwise you infantilize the people who are at least "adult enough" at that point, but it's an absolutely horrible degenerate industry full of predators and scum. Most of the people who get suckered into it only did so because they were molested to the point they're drug addicted wrecks. Look at the list of dead porn stars in their 20s and 30s from ODs, suicide, and other crazy bad behavior.
"But not all pornographers. . ." yeah I know, just like 90% of them.
I'm not saying outlaw making it or watching it, just that we could do a whole hell of a lot better job of punishing the worst of the bad actors, and providing actual therapy and vocational training for those willing to get it instead of just letting people go to perdition in that particular way.
Also whenever pornographers have been legally allowed to use actual children they jump at the opportunity.
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2021
I don't like to be picky with anatomy and that but this is all over the place. Is she sucking on that penis from bellow when sending the pic? Why is her leg clipping through the floor on the next panel? I made a mistake and I should have sold low effort coombait on patreon instead
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2016
Kameraden, I’m going mad.
There is a comic called Tamberlane which was mentioned earlier in this thread, back in 2018. I believe it was also referenced in the GlitchedPuppet thread a couple years prior with regards to having very questionable grooming material akin to (but different from) the Floraverse comic. However, if you were to navigate to the comic website now and read a bit of it, you might be confused by this comparison. Besides a bit of gender jargon, it seems quite innocuous.
But this connection was not made in error! It came about specifically because, at some point in time around 2015-2017, all of the characters in Tamberlane were drawn, on every page, without pants and (particularly if male) with genitals visible all throughout the otherwise unsexualized story, like “realistic” Disney animals with their balls out. This included the old man coyote, the cheerful canine father, and yes, even the children. This dedication to anatomically accurate cartoon animals included a scene where the reader is introduced to a very young furry child with clearly visible male genitals as he appears to be in the process of changing into a dress, only to be spoken of with feminine pronouns and name by his mother in the following panels. This is, of course, so that all characters present might treat this trans two year old as normal in the presence of the titular Tamberlane, herself a child still in diapers at that point in the story, which otherwise has the child-friendly veneer of a talking animal cartoon meant for real children. Delightful stuff.
I vividly remember all of this. I clearly recall that the starkness of this exact context (comparison to Glip/Floraverse) is the only reason I have ever had to be exposed to this comic in the first place, and the only reason I remembered it again is because I wanted to see if the author had doubled down on the questionable elements like Glip did. However, if one goes to read the comic now, pants have retroactively been applied to the old pages; no reference to this bizarre initial decision is made anywhere across the entire internet. Of course this is a good thing, and it indicates that the author (who yet identifies as queer and so forth) perhaps realized how disturbing the choice was. Then again, it very well may have been a purely pragmatic decision to ensure that the Kickstarter for the physical books would be both permitted by the site and better received by audiences outside of the queer furry bubble.
The solitary downside of this commendable about-turn is that I’ve been gaslit. I need to know if anyone else remembers this at all, or if I’m just stuck alone with this cursed knowledge. The author is a dab hand at the memory hole, because other than an announcement that “the Patreon is no longer 18+,” I can find no evidence that the original pages ever existed, not even here on the farms, except for my own wretched recollection.
But this connection was not made in error! It came about specifically because, at some point in time around 2015-2017, all of the characters in Tamberlane were drawn, on every page, without pants and (particularly if male) with genitals visible all throughout the otherwise unsexualized story, like “realistic” Disney animals with their balls out. This included the old man coyote, the cheerful canine father, and yes, even the children. This dedication to anatomically accurate cartoon animals included a scene where the reader is introduced to a very young furry child with clearly visible male genitals as he appears to be in the process of changing into a dress, only to be spoken of with feminine pronouns and name by his mother in the following panels. This is, of course, so that all characters present might treat this trans two year old as normal in the presence of the titular Tamberlane, herself a child still in diapers at that point in the story, which otherwise has the child-friendly veneer of a talking animal cartoon meant for real children. Delightful stuff.
I vividly remember all of this. I clearly recall that the starkness of this exact context (comparison to Glip/Floraverse) is the only reason I have ever had to be exposed to this comic in the first place, and the only reason I remembered it again is because I wanted to see if the author had doubled down on the questionable elements like Glip did. However, if one goes to read the comic now, pants have retroactively been applied to the old pages; no reference to this bizarre initial decision is made anywhere across the entire internet. Of course this is a good thing, and it indicates that the author (who yet identifies as queer and so forth) perhaps realized how disturbing the choice was. Then again, it very well may have been a purely pragmatic decision to ensure that the Kickstarter for the physical books would be both permitted by the site and better received by audiences outside of the queer furry bubble.
The solitary downside of this commendable about-turn is that I’ve been gaslit. I need to know if anyone else remembers this at all, or if I’m just stuck alone with this cursed knowledge. The author is a dab hand at the memory hole, because other than an announcement that “the Patreon is no longer 18+,” I can find no evidence that the original pages ever existed, not even here on the farms, except for my own wretched recollection.
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2020
I think Kemono has the original pages. Wayback machine has some links from the comic site archived from 2016, but the images don’t really work for me.
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2021
You're supposed to glitch through the floor having sex are you not? That's what I learned from all my Skyrim and fallout sex mods
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2016
It appears Kemono has reflected the changes to the patreon as well:
And I likewise find nothing in the Wayback machine. Thank you for pointing me in a couple of directions, but alas, fate has decided that I will continue to be haunted alone and in perpetuity.
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2020
It does have some of the nude pictures you're talking about?
Although you might be wrong on the whole "every character was nude on every page" thing since the artist's DA, which is seemingly inactive, has some 2016 posts of the comic that shows the characters with pants.
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2016
Your eyes are sharper than mine. The pages I remembered and looked for specifically were edited in every upload I saw, so I assumed that all of them were. While it definitely wasn’t on every page, the cartoon nudity was jarring when fullbody shots appeared and this was no doubt more common in certain parts of the story than others.
As the Discord screenshot says, the comic was different only through chapter 3 and it appears from the Kemono upload dates that the kickstarter adjustments took place in 2016 as well, so it looks like it was a short window of time indeed.
Danke, Kamerad. I rest easy on account of your dedicated sleuthing.