General GunTuber thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
A printed part and printer are far cheaper and more dimensionally accurate than any casting, unless we're talking a pressurized high end injection mold with Zamak. Although 3D materials are not as strong as forged 7075 aluminum or heat treated tool steel, you can still do a lot with them.

Look at basically every striker pistol in the last 20 years, the P90, and probably a bunch of others I don't know about. They're made of presumably GF Nylon or Zytel, but you simply just make shit thicker and make it out of weaker materials, like the Hoffman lowers. We even have relatively affordable machines like the SV06 that can print CF and GF Nylons, so we're able to get pretty close to factory guns in many ways. That filament is pretty expensive at $60 or so a KG, but that's nothing when you compare it to actually buying gun parts, something that should be avoided sometimes so we have full DIY designs just in case. Printing isn't perfect, but it has tons more development to come, whereas casting doesn't seem to have a whole lot more to do. Maybe someday we'll be lucky enough for those metal dust printers to be easily accessible for your average person, and you can print a kickass can or whatever else.

To cast a part you pretty much need a printer plus a few hundred bucks of shit that can't be done indoors unless you spend more money on an electric furnace. Making a pattern is really hard and can't really be done without a printer or CNC to any meaningful level, at least for something as intricate as gun stuff. Sure you could do all this, but the quality of guns you make wouldn't be that much better than some dude with a $300 printer and a roll of CF Nylon.
Cast aluminum is also weak as shit and isn't very ductile, and there's really not a way around it. Zamak is heavy and surprisingly good. You'd still need to alter the gun design a lot in order to have a somewhat strong gun, probably to the same level as a printed design. You'd then need to finish the part a lot unless you were able to have a CNC mold where you inject high pressure Zamak, like a Hi Point slide. Ths would require a router with a lot of jigs time, a mill, CNC, or lathe. These would also require at least $100 in cutters as well probably. There's already options for easily machinable receivers where you basically bolt together metal plates.
Like I already mentioned, parts builds are cool and all, but we should come up with full DIY stuff like the FGC9 if we can't get parts, or if you're in the rest of the world besides God's greatest country.

The Hoffman super safeties are made out of either stainless or titanium that are SLS or MJF printed, since that's at least somewhat dimensionally accurate and predictable for shrinkage. This is actually really good and there's good suppressors made this way using titanium and inconel, but they're super fucking expensive. Like half a mil expensive. Powder isn't cheap either, and it requires processing to be reusable.
 
Hoffman tactical said he had the super safetys "3d metal printed in china then imported to the US"
That's what I said, I'm pretty sure that's an SLS or MJF printer. They use powder and stick it together with a laser or something else, and titanium and stainless are the most popular metals for it. If they were actually imported, that'd suck if he goes to court since the feds could say it's an ITAR item.

There's a good chance he had Shapeways in the US do it, but after a while they probably caught on with everybody wanting these things. I forget where I heard it, but a bunch of stupid niggers don't change the file names for auto sears and the super safety and even places in China tell them to fuck off.
 
What's the general feeling about BlokeOnTheRange ? Seems pretty chill and doesn't look like he has any skeletons in his closet.
Probably my favourite gun tuber at this moment. A good mix of nerdery regarding technical details, range and match shooting and history of old guns. Snippets to Swiss culture (guns or general) is interesting as well.
 
From the Brassfacts video posted to the Karl megathread where Ian makes a cameo and basically says Karl is a Satan worshiping faggot and Russel is fat as fuck there was a minor noticing.

Brassfacts calls it "Moons out '24" in the video title and only writes the Goons Out part in the description. In a prior TFBTV podcast he mentioned basically how shocked he was that Ian named it "Moons out, Goons out". I'm pretty sure it was #99 New Years Gun Resolutions where they were starting to get drunk but I am not going to re-listen to it (even my gunt ism has limits). I guess Ian should have made the "Goons Out" part in cursive so these zoomers wouldn't notice it.


 
I thought ITAR only applied on the way out not in.
ITAR is a tack-on charge for folks or going after people who they want dead for sanctions busting. Kinda like 922r compliance. But pretty sure if the design was made in the us, then the transfer of the blueprint to China is in violation of ITAR. Not the importing part to the US portion.
 
From the Brassfacts video posted to the Karl megathread where Ian makes a cameo and basically says Karl is a Satan worshiping faggot and Russel is fat as fuck there was a minor noticing.

Brassfacts calls it "Moons out '24" in the video title and only writes the Goons Out part in the description. In a prior TFBTV podcast he mentioned basically how shocked he was that Ian named it "Moons out, Goons out". I'm pretty sure it was #99 New Years Gun Resolutions where they were starting to get drunk but I am not going to re-listen to it (even my gunt ism has limits). I guess Ian should have made the "Goons Out" part in cursive so these zoomers wouldn't notice it.


Karl's ball washers seething in the comments are truly delightful
 
This nigga built a Battle Rifle from Halo 2, because the Kel Tec RDB was too shitty.
battle rifle.png
Apparently garand dumb is going to do a video on it this sunday.
 
ITAR is a tack-on charge for folks or going after people who they want dead for sanctions busting. Kinda like 922r compliance. But pretty sure if the design was made in the us, then the transfer of the blueprint to China is in violation of ITAR. Not the importing part to the US portion.
It is a bit more to that as Elon found out, when the Ukrainians were trying to use Starlink to hit targets in Crimea and the Pentagon cut the connections to prevent it. Since Starlink is for "civilian use only" and if it had been used militarily will have automatically bumped it to dual-purpose and under ITAR restriction.
 
It is a bit more to that as Elon found out, when the Ukrainians were trying to use Starlink to hit targets in Crimea and the Pentagon cut the connections to prevent it. Since Starlink is for "civilian use only" and if it had been used militarily will have automatically bumped it to dual-purpose and under ITAR restriction.
The Pentagon pays for Starlink purchases by the Ukrainian Military. SpaceX decided on their own they would not activate any Starlink terminals in or near Crimea, deep inside the Donbass, or the Russian border because Elon Musk does not approve of Ukrainian military operations in those regions. This decision from Musk provoked outrage from the US government and an investigation into the matter from the Senate Armed Services Committee.
 
The Pentagon pays for Starlink purchases by the Ukrainian Military. SpaceX decided on their own they would not activate any Starlink terminals in or near Crimea, deep inside the Donbass, or the Russian border because Elon Musk does not approve of Ukrainian military operations in those regions. This decision from Musk provoked outrage from the US government and an investigation into the matter from the Senate Armed Services Committee.
it seems that didn't stay his policy because those Ukrainian long range torpedoes are controlled via starlink, and they have attack sevastopol lots of times.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: HumptiDouji
The Pentagon pays for Starlink purchases by the Ukrainian Military. SpaceX decided on their own they would not activate any Starlink terminals in or near Crimea, deep inside the Donbass, or the Russian border because Elon Musk does not approve of Ukrainian military operations in those regions. This decision from Musk provoked outrage from the US government and an investigation into the matter from the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Not how it happened as Elon have no authority or ability to go against the Pentagon and thus the U.S. government when that situation happened. Again Elon "disapproval" is over his Starlink and SpaceX potentially going from being accessible to everyone in the world to going United States and approved Allies exclusive due to now being under ITAR restrictions. Elon did provoked outrage with his opinions on the war but as proven he wasn't wrong on the legalese as much as the Ukrainians and their supporters didn't want to hear. Fourthly if Musk did go against the U.S. Government then why the fuck is Starlink still under Elon's ownership? Or that Elon had set up Starshield which is completely separate Starlink version just for military use. Which the U.S. military and Ukrainian armed forces are currently now using.

it seems that didn't stay his policy because those Ukrainian long range torpedoes are controlled via starlink, and they have attack sevastopol lots of times.
Ukrainians happen to be using Elon made and U.S. govt approved Starshield for that operation.
 
Back