Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

How do you grade Brad Watson? This is an official poll that reflects the will of GOD.

  • Excellent A - Freedom from corporeal shackles and permitted audience with THE LORD.

    Votes: 168 13.6%
  • Passing B - Freedom from corporeal shackles and free attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Fair C - Freedom from corporeal shackles. Given limited, general attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Poor D - Reincarnated as Man to be given a second chance at attempting to earn GOD's graces.

    Votes: 39 3.2%
  • Fail F - Reincarnated as a non-human for 326 years, 221 days, and 14 hours.

    Votes: 76 6.2%
  • Fail F - Sentenced to eternal tortures in HELL for crimes against THE LORD GOD.

    Votes: 106 8.6%
  • Fail F - Forced to post on the kiwifarms.net for 24 years, 30 days, and 2 hours.

    Votes: 802 64.9%

  • Total voters
    1,235
Not necessarily. If you've noticed "46" before, then that's your perception within your current timeline. I don't remember it, therefore it was fluid in my perception within my current timeline. Having observed it, the wave is broken and the point is fixed.
So full of shit it's embarrassing.
@voiceguy,

You may be the only one of the 600+ Kiwis + many more guests who have come on this thread who is not open-minded to any evidence or logic of reincarnation. How does that distinction feel?
I would feel quite honored if I indeed had that distinction. However, I don't think there are many people here who accept your claims of reincarnation because your primary piece of evidence is something you wrote yourself (which, incidentally, makes no sense) and you have presented no real logic because you have been caught in so many lies. To sum up briefly:
  • You claim to have been Confucius and Pythagoras, who both lived at the same time.
  • You say you were not Buddha, but claim to have been Vishnu. Buddha was an avatar of Vishnu who existed on Earth at the same time as Confucius and Pythagoras.
  • You claim to be the reincarnation of Vishnu, but Vishnu is an immortal deity. Vishnu has not died, so you cannot be his reincarnation.
  • You claim you were Plato, but you misquoted him and screwed up a translation into Greek.
With all of the lies you have already been caught in, why would anyone in their right mind believe anything you say about reincarnation?
 
-----------------------------------
Let me see if I can correct my mistakes on http://www.startrek.com/article/harsh-reviews-of-the-original-series-from-1966-believe-it ? Its impotant two corect you're missteakes.
It was no coincidence that I made those mistakes and corrections. Now besides knowing that Gazoo=64 and Spock=64, I AM aware that Gazoo came out in The Flinstones when I was 6-years-old and Spock in Star Trek when I was 7. This code of FIG=6|7 is the basis of Plan-it Theory: all 'true Earth-like plan-its' run on 6 or 7 (4 is a given).
This just shows that you are willing to fudge around the numbers until you satisfy your numbers fetish. This just underlines of insignificant your gematria nonsense is. And if you want a more detailed rundown, go back to page 614 where I have already proven that.

4 is a given: all Earth analogs have 4 seasons, a large moon with 4 phases, 4 Cardinal directions, 4 forces, 4 components of DNA, 4 common dimensions*, 4 aspects of hypertime, 4 common forms of matter, etc.
Nestor doesn't exist. There are more people willing to believe that Namek is real.
Prove me wrong, I dare you.

@voiceguyGet used to it. FIG=6|7 is BIG and gets BIGGER every day.


Synchronism: 10:41 "Your mathematical shortcomings." - IHOP ad on BBC America
and
You may be the only one of the 600+ Kiwis + many more guests who have come on this thread who is not open-minded to any evidence or logic of reincarnation. How does that distinction feel?

Nope. I've pointed this out a couple of times, but you have no disciples. Noone takes you seriously, your forum is a ghost town. Noone ever engages you and tells you how much they believe in your theories. Noone. Never.

Prove me wrong.
 
This just shows that you are willing to fudge around the numbers until you satisfy your numbers fetish. This just underlines of insignificant your gematria nonsense is. And if you want a more detailed rundown, go back to page 614 where I have already proven that.


Nestor doesn't exist. There are more people willing to believe that Namek is real.
Prove me wrong, I dare you.


and


Nope. I've pointed this out a couple of times, but you have no disciples. Noone takes you seriously, your forum is a ghost town. Noone ever engages you and tells you how much they believe in your theories. Noone. Never.

Prove me wrong.

I doubt if Brad could successfully prove water is wet.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
Are you open-minded to reincarnation?


I know that 'Reincarnation' is a term that originated in the 19th century and that transmigration of the soul and metempsychosis are English terms that are much older.

Many people in Jesus' time believed in a rebirth as human on Earth. The mystical Jews believed in reincarnation and believed the soul of Moses was reincarnated in each new generation. The Greek Pythagorean taught it to those in their circles.

Some people say it wasn't until St. Augustine came along in the 4th century, repented from his sinful ways, and then on his own, declared, "There are no previous lives to blame for one's ailments and low position in society, it's all Eve's fault" (paraphrased). Yes, it was Augustine who coined the term "original sin", you won't find it in the Bible and rabbis don't teach it! You will find Bible references to "you reap what you sow".
 
'Laugh' instead of 'lauf' or 'laff' is a good example of the strange occasional use in English of gh in place of f. Is this a 'coincidence' in lieu of FIG=6|7?


13:01 "It's for my own good." - ST: TNG

I know that 'Reincarnation' is a term that originated in the 19th century and that transmigration of the soul and metempsychosis are English terms that are much older. Many people in Jesus' time believed in a rebirth as human on Earth. The mystical Jews believed in reincarnation and believed the soul of Moses was reincarnated in each new generation. The Greek Pythagorean taught it to those in their circles. Some people say it wasn't until St. Augustine came along in the 4th century, repented from his sinful ways, and then on his own, declared, "There are no previous lives to blame for one's ailments and low position in society, it's all Eve's fault" (paraphrased). Yes, it was Augustine who coined the term "original sin", you won't find it in the Bible and rabbis don't teach it! You will find Bible references to "you reap what you sow".
It's like an echo chamber in here.


Synch 13:04 "No matter where you go, you are here." - ad on BBC Am

@bacterium,

Are you open-minded to reincarnation?

(Note: I AM switching to Arial font just to fuc with everyone.)


@Overchek,

Are you open-minded to reincarnation?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Dumb
Reactions: bacterium
@Brad Watson_Miami

The following is 'the key'(73=T20+H8+E5+K11+E5+Y25) to thee sacred patterns that Lincoln has missed...

"As above, so below" is the premise of the ancient mystery practice of 'Sacred Geometry'. Jesus refers to it when 'The Lord's Prayer' has the correct wording of "On Earth as it is in the heavens." The confusion between 'heavens': the sky and 'heaven': an ideal place and time near GOD is a HUGE problem! Jesus taught, "The kingdom of GOD (heaven) is within you", but very few Christian leaders get that right.

Lincoln seems unaware of Simple(6,73) English(7,73) Gematria(8,74) and GOD=7_4 (google that). 'Gematria' is the geometry of the language; namely the alphanumeric code. It's 'the key'(74) that opens 'the lock'(74). Occult=74=O15+C3+C3+U21+L12+T20.

Jesus=94=J10+E5+S19+U21+S19, Y'shua(74)/Joshua(74)/Iesous(73,88)/IESVS(74) 'the King'(74)/Jewish(74) Messiah(74) was on the Cross(74) on Good(7__4) Friday 7/4/783 AUC (April 7, 30 AD). He was born on 17/4/748 AUC (April 17, 6 BC).

Did Jesus marry Mary? "Marry Mary" is a BIG code in English(78=E5+N14+G7+L12+I9+S19+H8). Mary=57=M13+A1+R18+Y25, Magdalen=57, Rose=57, Moon=55.

'Magdalene' is a poor spelling and should be replaced with 'Magdalean'=58=M13+A1+G7+D4+A1+L12+E5+A1+N14. There is now connect(74)ion between(74) design(58), science(58), star(58), astro-(58/73), goddess(58,73), blood(58), etc.

"Anytime an idea(19) is connected to nature, it's not only logical, it was inevitable."

There may not be a true 'Venus Pentacle' at Rennes, but there's definitely a 5/8 pattern to it. 'Coincidentally', Magdalean(58) was born on 5/8/2 BC (8/5/751 AUC): May 8th is 'coincidentally' the first possible date of 'Mother's Day' in the US. It's a Masonic(74) thing. Magdalean's Greek name was 'Mariamne'(74) like King Herod I's wife.
 
@ChurchOfGodBear,

Hey, motherfucker, are you open-minded to reincarnation?
Do you care?

Not necessarily. If you've noticed "46" before, then that's your perception within your current timeline. I don't remember it, therefore it was fluid in my perception within my current timeline. Having observed it, the wave is broken and the point is fixed.

So you've saying it wasn't real until you saw it, even if someone else saw it? So your observations are the only thing which determines what is real and what is not?

You realize you just described your thought process as a very pragmatic definition of schizophrenia, don't you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
'Magdalene' is a poor spelling and should be replaced with 'Magdalean'=58
Why? Because you couldn't find enough 62s? You cannot change how a word or name is spelled just to make it fit into your insane numbering scheme.
May 8th is 'coincidentally' the first possible date of 'Mother's Day' in the US. It's a Masonic(74) thing.
Not as much as you want us to believe. Almost since this thread has started you've been bragging about how Masons encode the numbers 7 and 4 in everything because they are the most sacred of Masonic Numbers. That is a lie. Albert G. Mackey (1807-1881) (Grand Lecturer and Grand Secretary of The Grand Lodge of South Carolina, as well as Secretary General of the Supreme Council of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite for the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States) writes on page 538 of An Encyclopedia of Freemasonry: "The most important symbolic or sacred numbers in Masonry are three, five, seven, nine, twenty-seven, and eighty-one." There's no 4, there's no 8. You, sir, have been lying for 658 pages.

While I was looking through it, I looked up Gematria: nothing; Sacred Geometry: nothing (there was a section on geometry citing Euclid, not Pythagoras, as the founder of geometry; but there no mention of it being sacred); Grand Architect of the Universe: yup, that's there, as the title given to God by the Masons.

So you got a little bit right, but most of what you have been saying about Masonry is WRONG!

By the way Brad, you never answered my question about the clip I posted from The Lost Tomb of Jesus: Did you see the bones in the ossuary...liar?
 
Last edited:
Reincarnation has to exist; my box of jelly beans told me so. They did also say that Brad Watson was actually Benito Mussolini in his past life rather than Einstein. Turns out being a fascist dictator merits a humbling experience as a worthless cokehead whose life achievements never came to be, thus creating the desperate desire to pretend he himself accomplished stuff. In other news, turns out being Scoop Jackson merits becoming me, some shitposting moron online.
 
"'46?" Capt. Picard asked his bother while home in France. "'47", replied his brother in reference to the year of their wine. - Family, Star Trek: TNG (S4/Ep2, 1990) on BBC America, 10/13/16 16:40

Just a few posts back, I spoke about Gene Roddenberry beginning Star Trek in '64, etc. Then a synchronism happened while I was writing here where "46" was said during a The Next Generation episode when 47 has been recognized as the 'Star Trek 47 Code' since c. 1990. Alot of discussion of FOD=6_4 and FIG=6|7 later, and then we hear, "'46?" "'47". Huh.

Many often misquote Einstein's Relativity Principle as saying nothing can travel faster-than-light - it's the Universe's speed limit. Wrong. Einstein discovered that nothing with mass could accelerate to the speed-of-light.

Thought outside the brain is massless, therefore, it can travel back-in-time, thus creating a new event that then creates a series of causes-and-effects that appears in the present as a synchronism.

I've seen this TNG episode several times, but I didn't remember this line. Therefore the dialogue was fluid in my perception within my current timeline. Having now observed it, the wave is broken and the point is fixed.


@Adamska ,

So, are you open-minded to reincanation?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Adamska ,

So, are you open-minded to reincanation?
Ya, but not in the way you use it, namely because I much prefer the Hindu/Buddhist notion of how it works rather than as a cheap way to claim the deeds of famous folk.

And for more Star Trek discussion since you actually come close to showing you actually have hobbies and a personality with that: which was the worst TNG movie? And which was the worst ToS movie? Then which are the best ones?
 
Ya, but not in the way you use it, namely because I much prefer the Hindu/Buddhist notion of how it works rather than as a cheap way to claim the deeds of famous folk.

And for more Star Trek discussion since you actually come close to showing you actually have hobbies and a personality with that: which was the worst TNG movie? And which was the worst ToS movie? Then which are the best ones?

Best in my opinion: Voyage Home and First Contact. Worst: The Motion Picture and either Nemesis or Insurrection. Probably Insurrection but it's been awhile since I've watched either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
Best in my opinion: Voyage Home and First Contact. Worst: The Motion Picture and either Nemesis or Insurrection. Probably Insurrection but it's been awhile since I've watched either.

Out of curiosity, why The Motion Picture?
 
For me, the best were Wrath of Khan and... I would have to agree, First Contact. My worst would the the Final Frontier and then Nemesis. Insurrection at least felt like an episode.

Though really the worst of both worlds is Generations IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
Best for me is Wrath of Khan, worst is Search for Spock with TMP coming in close second for best.
First Contact and Nemesis for best and worst TNG
 
Back