Law IT IS FINISHED”—NYAG Letitia James Crucifies VDARE.com - Abuse of the Legal system for political gain

my comment: "This is extremely concerning and I worry about this tactic into the future."





IT IS FINISHED”—NYAG Letitia James Crucifies VDARE.com

VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow writes:

I launched VDARE.com on Christmas Eve 1999. So it is perhaps appropriate that, on Good Friday 2024, the anniversary of Christ’s death, I must announce VDARE.com’s crucifixion by New York State’s communist Attorney General Letitia James.

On March 27 2024, in another of her lightning-fast NYAG James-compliant rulings, New York State Supreme Court Judge Sabrina Kraus held us in Contempt Of Court because we have not yet complied (because we were fighting it) with her January 23 2023 order that we meet NYAG James’ massive and crippling subpoena demands.

Judge Kraus did modify her earlier order to reflect the
intervention (much appreciated) of the Institute for Free Speech. So now we no longer have to reveal, explicitly, the names of our pseudonymous writers, some of whom would certainly be fired from their jobs if their identities leaked.

But we are still required to produce 40 gigabytes of emails, an enormous amount. And of course these would in fact reveal the names of those pseudonymous writers, as well as our donors, privileged communications with lawyers etc.
Judge Kraus has also now allowed us to redact these emails. But this is a huge task, which our lawyers estimate could cost as much as $150,000.

An observer tells us this order is more typical of major corporate litigation, not a tiny charity.
And, perversely, although Judge Kraus has now modified her January 23 2023 order, she is nevertheless now fining us $250 a day for not complying with it.

We have fought NYAG Letitia James, at a cost of up to $1 million, for nearly three years. But now we are literally hanging on the cross.
REMEMBER, VDARE.com HAS NOT BEEN CHARGED WITH ANYTHING—BECAUSE IT IS NOT GUILTY OF ANYTHING.
There is no legitimate explanation for NYAG’ James enormous fishing expedition—other than a desire to nail us to the cross with compliance costs. The process is the punishment.

NYAG James has claimed to be interested in our
purchase of the Berkeley Springs Castle as a conference venue. But this transaction was expensively lawyered and is bullet-proof. Significantly, NYAG James has refused to meet with our expensive lawyers to discuss it.
The victims of crucifixion
typically took a long time to die. (Christ was an exception).

All our resources are now focused on our death struggle. VDARE.com will continue publishing on a reduced schedule as long as it can, at least until after our April 26-28 conference.

But , as Christ said on the cross, “
it is finished.”

The suppression of VDARE.com’s voice, at a time when the immigration debate is moving to a climax, is of course a political scandal.
But, on a personal level, I might also observe that VDARE.com was an entirely viable 24/7 opinion convenience store. I had hoped to leave it to my young wife and our children after I am gone. Now it appears, thanks to Letitia James, that this will not be possible. They will need some other means of support.

Nevertheless, I’m immensely grateful for VDARE.com’s much loved readers and supporters over these many years.
We hope to see you on the other side.
 
Interesting. Where does this put a pro-se defendent? Would they be compelled to engage a lawyer to perform redaction for subpoenaed information? I guess even if not, that point is still moot here since the defendent has representation.
It depends on how much information you have. If you somehow have tens of thousands of pages of stuff to go through, you're in trouble. If you can do it yourself, less so, but if the other side challenges it and you have no lawyers to argue privilege, you might have to turn over all that information for an in camera review, which just means by the judge. In that case, the court would have to suck it up, but you might not like the results.
 
We could use some of our law spergs to clarify what exactly is going on here I think
To sum it up in the most laymans terms possible, this quoted part here

Respondent has not made a prima facie showing that producing the information would have an impact on or chill its members' associational rights (see Matter of Evergreen Assn., Inc. v Schneiderman, 153 AD3d at 100). Contrary to respondent's claim, anonymity of its vendors and contributors would not be sacrificed, as both the OAG and the court have agreed to a so-ordered confidentiality agreement. Moreover, while respondent has acknowledged having detractors which has resulted in certain adverse consequences, it does not follow that identifying names of vendors subject to a confidentiality agreement would result in harassment, membership withdrawal, or discouragement of new members, or other consequences that would impact its members' associational rights (see Perry v Schwarzenegger, 591 F3d at 1160).
In other words "We the court, totally pinky-promise, we swear, that the names of donors, vendors and contributors will  never be leaked, perhaps by some activist paralegal or through a "random unrelated hack". That will totally never happen, we guarantee it! ( tee-hee! 😉 ) And even if it DID HAPPEN why on earth would anybody want to retaliate against these leaked names?!"

We find no support for respondent's contention that the OAG conceded any retaliatory [*2]animus or was targeting it for its protected speech
Translation: "Weaponized lawfare never happens! Our justice system is blind, and the judges and attorney general are completely impartial!" Or, in other words, Fuck you, we do what we want! You can't prove our completely obvious corruption, and even if you could, what ate you going to do about it?



Interesting. Where does this put a pro-se defendent? Would they be compelled to engage a lawyer to perform redaction for subpoenaed information? I guess even if not, that point is still moot here since the defendent has representation.
A pro-se defendent is still obligated to provide the subpoenaed material in a timely manner. If not, the court could impose sanctions for "Failure to Obey a Discovery Order". Or, if what they provide isn't to the judge's satisfaction, they could be sanctioned for "Failure to Admit", and a particularly pissy judge, which this one seems to be, could enter a default judgment against them. So in essence, "Give us what we want, when we want, OR ELSE!"

The fact is, they KNOW what they're doing is an exceedingly onerous task and is meant to bury the defendent under an almost insurmountable legal and financial burden. And they KNOW that they're going to get away with it. Activist driven judges and Attorney Generals are openly disregarding longstanding precedant and the law through any means necessary to persecute/prosecute their political and ideological enemies. Fining Alex Jones $1.44 billion over his sperging following the Sandy Hook school shooting? And they were seriously considering as much as 2.75 TRILLION DOLLARS. All because he hurt some feelings, and occasionally says things that posses off the people in power. Or Donald Trump, who whether you like him or not, has been subjected to more weaponized lawfare with unjust summary judgements than anyone else in history. The AG who is prosecuting him openly ran on a platform of "getting Trump". Yup, no impartiality there! They're trying to seize his properties because they think that they're worth differently than what was stated in his private loans, that were settled amicably between himself and his bank. Or even that bucktoothed, legit retard Russell Greer who is constantly handled with kid gloves in his endless LOL-suits because he has the intelligence of a wet potato, getting activist judges to openly go against decades of established law, because "evil KiwiFarms is bad!"

The whole goddamn legal system is poisoned by ideological communist faggots, and turned it into clown world. I hate it.
 
ideological communist faggots
Yay another solzhenitsyn. We have Troikas. You capitalist cockwhores invented lawfare. Get raped.

I don’t understand older people who feel good about marrying people (women) this much younger.
He's a piece of shit but your reasoning is wrong.
Brimelow will fuck off from this mortal coil soon and he will be dead and not giving a shit about his uktra fascist murder website going dark.
If by some miracle he managed to have kids with a 55-year-old wife, he'd be in the right.
If he were a young man dying from a terminal illness having children with his wife, he'd be in the right.
He's not evil for probably dying soon, he's evil for
1. saddling the children with a gold-digging thot of a mother, and
2. practising an Islamic lifestyle while preaching about Christ and White nationalism.
 
If republicans don't start sticking progressive, leftist and dem orgs to the walls over every and any little detail they can find at this point.. all hope for a free and just society is lost. This is at, fully at, the point of "pain" being the only way forward and out! They can't be allowed to get away with this shit unchallenged. We know the federal courts won't help 95% of the time in defensive cases. Every standard these AGs and cases sets, will be the rope used to hang their orgs.

The abuse and weaponizing of the legal system, criminal, civil and administrative, in just the last ~2-5 years, is astonishing and terrifying!
 
Last edited:
It's comforting to see the rest of the community equally on top of these quiet cases.

Now i'm going to piss off partisan republicans.
In cases like this one, the wikileaks "Operation Choke Point" lawsuit over its credit card processing, the Mann case, and many others, over the past 10-15 years, the "Roberts Court" has quietly refused to intervene.

It is clear, especially after Murthy V. Missouri's oral arguments, but before that, the tortured ruling on Obamacare, that Roberts is a slavish hack for the Total State.
The man and anyone else who cooperated with him to damage first amendment protections, starting with Wikileaks, needs to be impeached.

A full 6 seats need to be cleared on that bench, including 2 of Trump's appointees.

If republicans don't start sticking progressive, leftist and dem orgs to the walls over every and any little detail they can find at this point.. all hope for a free and just society is lost. This is at, fully at, the point of "pain" being the only way forward and out! They can't be allowed to get away with this shit unchallenged. We know the federal courts won't help 95% of the time in defensive cases. Every standard these AGs and cases sets, will be the rope used to hang their orgs.

The abuse and weaponizing of the legal system,, criminal, civil and administrative, in just the last ~2-5 years, is astonishing and terrifying!
Please don't tell me you actually expect this from the brigade of cucks who can't even vacate the chair when their house speaker colludes with communists to fund the lawfare against their leading presidential candidate.
 
This is more grandstanding by Leticia James in preparation for her Presidential campaign of 2028.

  • She took out Cuomo for the Dems so he couldn't run against Kamala or another POC for President
  • She took out the NRA
  • She's trying to be the one to say she took out Trump
  • She's crusading for Climate Justice by targeting the beef industry
  • Now she's crusading for migrants and open borders
This is not the first time she's done the last point. A year ago she refused to support Kathy Hoschul, and would not allow her office to represent the State of NY in a case against NYC busing migrants to Upstate cities, because she believes "housing is a human right" and towns all over NYS should have to house millions of refugees at local expense.

She is setting herself up to be a Super Liberal Democrat with national recognition, and when 2028 is an open field next election, she will run, mark my words.

I believe she has support in the DNC too, because she briefly ran against Hoschul for Governor after she took out Cuomo, but quickly dropped out. I bet somebody told her to just use the AG office to build her cred, and maybe she's been promised a position in Biden's 2024 Cabinet if he wins.
 
“Literally” hanging on a cross, are we? Where is this now? Would love to come, thanks for inviting me!
 
I don't get why they mismanaged their nonprofit like this.
Everyone knows you nest these organizations so they can cast off anything that comes under state attack.
What do you mean exactly? Is there some way to decentralize your organization to make it much harder to attack legally speaking.

So he used his not for profit to purchase a castle that he lives in? Yeah, wow, I wonder what that "fishing expedition" is about.
No doubt VDARE is run by a grifter. In that sense he does deserve to get fucked over. But this is much bigger than VDARE being a grifter. This tactic could become modus operandi for destroying anyone not liked by leftists.
 
What do you mean exactly? Is there some way to decentralize your organization to make it much harder to attack legally speaking.
Yes, you spin off a different non-profit for each individual activity, and a for-profit (501c4) with the explicit duty of managing donations, separate from any comms internal to your activism.

They're being sued for shit unrelated to their publication, but because they had it all under one umbrella their entire comms stack is now open for "discovery".

Oh yeah, and if you're engaged in politically dissident activity, do not engage in any economic activity where your would-be persecutors have power if you have that choice.

If you're right wing, you incorporate and purchase capital in Texas, not Delaware or NY.
 
From Wikipedia, I learned that Peter Beimelow is 76. He has five children, two are from his first marriage and are adults. The other three are from his second wife:



So she is now in her late 30s.

I don’t understand older people who feel good about marrying people (women) this much younger. Brimelow will fuck off from this mortal coil soon and he will be dead and not giving a shit about his uktra fascist murder website going dark. But he will leave behind a wife with three young children, no means of support, and a name tarnished by “white supremacy” in an era where people would like to see her die in a ditch for this sin. Think of how people refuse to let Rachel Dolezal move on and magnify it. How can this woman find normal professional work if the website dies under a legal cloud?

I find the specter of lawfare against right wing outlets very grim, but fucking hell, this is bleak. I hope he has some investments.

it's nice of you to be concerned and I myself looked up the dates and how the first marriage ended, but as odd as the marriage is, Lydia Brimelow basically runs VDARE at this point and you have it backwards. When Brimelow finally dies her full power will be unleashed.
 
also this is good.

VDARE is as close to a respectable WN publications as exists. a lot of normies started reading it when they got online and they never stopped. a lot of those people donate.

more importantly vdare gets donations from famous people who have been hiding their powerlevel for a long time.

with the current situation at the border the time is ripe for people who can afford it to just accept being called racist and move the fuck on. John Derbyshire wasn't literally tarred and feathered, even Kevin McDonald and EMJ still have houses and stuff.

Things are changing fast. I don't know if anyone here follows radfem twitter; anyone run into the term "carceral feminism?" that's radfems who want violent men locked up. The same radfems who won't pretend men in dresses also, to many people's great surprise, won't pretend there isn't a racial component to violent crimes against women.
 
Back