Yes, they explicitly state he’d violated their code of conduct. That’s not an answer, it’s the excuse to get away with whatever it is they are doing. That’s the question, do they think he’s going to Barb the con? It’s nonsensical. WTF are they doing but farming for asspats? “I told the motherfucking tard, NO! I’m so cool, look at my framed copy. M’ lady.”
It's a brony con. However banning someone who has a documented history of causing problems at cons seems fine to me. Also we should be publically shaming sex pests, being sensitive to retard faggots is why we currently live in clown world.
Pretty sure any media can retain a fandom for long periods of time if the fandom dripfeeds new content. Even then nostalgia kicks in and some people just want to relive their childhood. Same shit with Toontown and Club Penguin, they have no business to exist and yet they do. There are probably many more examples I didn't think of. I think Megaman was pretty much in that limbo too, but Megaman fans were still very passionate about the dude.
Considering his past behavior, years of documented history of his conduct with women and general sperginess?
The con is a private organization, they can ban whoever they want for whatever reason they want to and I don't think they made a specific citation/claim for why he was banned. Now if they went out in public and said "yeah we banned this retard who raped his own mother from the con" maybe, but then he'd have to prove he didn't do it.
Agree with almost all of this. Especially public shaming, I don’t think it’s sensitivity. It’s prioritizing them (retard faggots,) that makes clown world what it is. I’m not talking about that, and it doesn’t go hand in hand. I’m talking about fairness, while trying not to make this an, “it’s about ethics in blah blah blah,” conversation. Impossible, I know, but figured I might as well try on this fine Easter Day.
Probably people who make money off the show by grifting merch.
They are the only way introvert Bronies can buy drugs and have sex parties.
Allow his attendance and ban if he started up with bannable behavior. Case by case. It’s not as if brony conventions are filled with morally upright citizens brigades. It’s clearly run by clout horses. Honestly, I don’t know the answer, it comes across as weighted & unfair, but I’m not the moral arbiter so who the hell knows. If they’d banned Chris and not farmed it for everyone to see, I’d probably not think twice about this after the news came out. I do know that Chris getting banned or not banned from a pony con is not the great straw that shall break the camels back of moral righteousness in the world.
Imagine being the poor bastard who, at minimum, possibly has the better part of a year derailed by auto repair costs and at worst has some life-ruining amount from medical bills thrust on them all because some fat autistic retard who fucked his geriatric mother threw a fat autistic retarded tantrum behind the wheel over being banned from a con full of fat autistic retards. Something chris would have forgotten about within the year and somehow recovered financially from in half the time. Would really make a man question if there's actually a god.
I understand that they can ban who they want. But they printed out the email that they sent to inform him of the ban. Along with Chris' response. Then they framed it and posted a pic of the framed emails online for everyone to see.
My parents still have their original AOL address from the early 90's. That email address is older than me and I'm a 1992 baby.
See below if you haven't already:
