The Android Raptor Problem

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

geckogoy

play kiwi station 13
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jan 3, 2024
Basically, it seems to be the forum policy to ignore people you find to be unbearably annoying/retarded/desperate for attention. A very prevalent issue at the moment is that retards other than me keep engaging and starting threads anyways. Is there any hope for a solution to this, such as a 'mute thread' button or something?

I don't need an automated system, I just mean like >see YET ANOTHER THREAD >mute thread >morons can sperg in peace

Thanks
 
android raptor is one of the least annoying consistent posters, I dont really get the outrage when there are much worse offenders of retard babble, often times the very people obsessed with android raptor in the first place
I think she's popular(?) by three things:
  • Passive-aggressive behavior
  • Woman
  • Being pro-abortion.
But that is. Nothing more. Basically a dusted oldfag.
 
There's several female users who garner an inordinate amount of attention. It's weird, because they're not really well-liked, but they like to argue. You'd expect that people would identify these posters as just being shit-stirrers and ignore them like they do other users who mostly just post bait, but, because they're women, people choose not to ignore them. Even though they're talking to someone they don't like, they enjoy female attention, even if it's negative attention and even if it's from someone they don't respect at all.

Ideally people would just ignore Android Raptor. She's a simpleton with a one-dimensional personality that is just her obsession with a handful of controversial topics, but she has a vagina, so there's a group of people who will engage her on those same topics in literally every thread all the time. It's hard to just ban her because she's not really doing anything wrong, but it's also hard to punish users for responding because she's the one putting out the bait.

Also, you're bringing up Android Raptor, but there's a handful of similar dysfunctional women with their own group of simps and anti-simps who follow each other around and cause problems across the site while adding very little. It's a really recent phenomena and I don't know why it's only happened in the last year or so.
 
There's several female users who garner an inordinate amount of attention. It's weird, because they're not really well-liked, but they like to argue. You'd expect that people would identify these posters as just being shit-stirrers and ignore them like they do other users who mostly just post bait, but, because they're women, people choose not to ignore them. Even though they're talking to someone they don't like, they enjoy female attention, even if it's negative attention and even if it's from someone they don't respect at all.

Ideally people would just ignore Android Raptor. She's a simpleton with a one-dimensional personality that is just her obsession with a handful of controversial topics, but she has a vagina, so there's a group of people who will engage her on those same topics in literally every thread all the time. It's hard to just ban her because she's not really doing anything wrong, but it's also hard to punish users for responding because she's the one putting out the bait.

Also, you're bringing up Android Raptor, but there's a handful of similar dysfunctional women with their own group of simps and anti-simps who follow each other around and cause problems across the site while adding very little. It's a really recent phenomena and I don't know why it's only happened in the last year or so.

For the majority, it's not even about simping or anti-simping, it's about feeding their own hubris by having a very retarded punching bag that simply never quits arguing. Same happened with Boxer shorts and many others, I don't think it's a female-only thing. Both AR and Stan are autistic, or at least claim to be and I find that quite believable. They do not know how to talk about anything else or even how to quit.
 
It's a really recent phenomena and I don't know why it's only happened in the last year or so.
Are the simps and anti-simps all from recent accounts, or is it older accounts doing it too? Because if it's the former I can kind of understand it being a new user demographic problem (Sharty refugees?), but if it's older users then it must be a new phenomenon happening to the forum culture as a whole.
 
Either ignore them or contribute to their misery in ways they won't enjoy as a means of behavior modification. Any successful forum will accumulate an ecosystem of camp followers looking for validation. Use them for animal experimentation.
 
There's several female users who garner an inordinate amount of attention. It's weird, because they're not really well-liked, but they like to argue. You'd expect that people would identify these posters as just being shit-stirrers and ignore them like they do other users who mostly just post bait, but, because they're women, people choose not to ignore them. Even though they're talking to someone they don't like, they enjoy female attention, even if it's negative attention and even if it's from someone they don't respect at all.
This is a "notorious user" problem not just a women one IMO, it just so happens that the (perceived) wahmen users get more attention because human psychology.
It goes both ways, as you say the detractors are being retarded and this is only because the detractees are directly enabling and in many cases causing the shitflinging, case in point the puzzle piece quality takes from the thread topic subject and their insistence on ceaseless engagement, it is not against the rules but I say "constructive problem causing" should be an offense. Not something I would trust a government with but forum arbitration is different, if there is a benign mole you should remove it before it becomes truly cancerous.
 
Is this an April 1st joke.
Cause I see no problem with AR.
Also, I appreciate the Deviant shitposting, but maybe you noticed that Dear Leader was not lately in a good mood and might not appreciate all this commotion.
Maybe stop baiting these spergouts and forum cleansing, so we can live and shitpost in peace?
 
case in point the puzzle piece quality takes from the thread topic subject and their insistence on ceaseless engagement, it is not against the rules but I say "constructive problem causing" should be an offense.
I disagree entirely. Simply being a retard isn’t against the rules and it shouldn’t be. If Android Raptor (and other users with a similar reputation for being contrarian and argumentative like HHH or even Lidl Drip) are shitting up a thread, just threadban them. Otherwise, censoring them is not the answer. That’s how you end up with a site culture akin to Reddit with inverse values.
 
For the majority, it's not even about simping or anti-simping, it's about feeding their own hubris by having a very retarded punching bag that simply never quits arguing. Same happened with Boxer shorts and many others, I don't think it's a female-only thing. Both AR and Stan are autistic, or at least claim to be and I find that quite believable. They do not know how to talk about anything else or even how to quit.
so what you're saying is, the solution is to unban boxy and put him in a cage match with apc?
 
I disagree entirely. Simply being a retard isn’t against the rules and it shouldn’t be. If Android Raptor (and other users with a similar reputation for being contrarian and argumentative like HHH or even Lidl Drip) are shitting up a thread, just threadban them. Otherwise, censoring them is not the answer. That’s how you end up with a site culture akin to Reddit with inverse values.
Can't ban retards just for being retarded that would be very developmentally disabled, but if the problem is people causing problems by their very presence then well shit it sucks for them but ruining it for the rest of us is an objective worse outcome and they should face the wall.
I'm not worried about this place ever being like r*ddit, purely because we're under the guiding benevolence of a sole higher being and aren't run by committee (democracy, the root of all incompetence, democratic centralism the worst kind of which).

For what it's worth I'm an AR appreciator and would be sad if they were ever banned.
 
there's a handful of similar dysfunctional women with their own group of simps and anti-simps who follow each other around and cause problems across the site while adding very little.
I was big SA goon back in the day and one of the justification for the heavy handed moderation was "signal to noise ratio" I rather liked it back in the day till the cat lady and later troon bigrade weaponized it.

What moderation policey would be best to address this problem?
 
Back