Law IT IS FINISHED”—NYAG Letitia James Crucifies VDARE.com - Abuse of the Legal system for political gain

my comment: "This is extremely concerning and I worry about this tactic into the future."





IT IS FINISHED”—NYAG Letitia James Crucifies VDARE.com

VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow writes:

I launched VDARE.com on Christmas Eve 1999. So it is perhaps appropriate that, on Good Friday 2024, the anniversary of Christ’s death, I must announce VDARE.com’s crucifixion by New York State’s communist Attorney General Letitia James.

On March 27 2024, in another of her lightning-fast NYAG James-compliant rulings, New York State Supreme Court Judge Sabrina Kraus held us in Contempt Of Court because we have not yet complied (because we were fighting it) with her January 23 2023 order that we meet NYAG James’ massive and crippling subpoena demands.

Judge Kraus did modify her earlier order to reflect the
intervention (much appreciated) of the Institute for Free Speech. So now we no longer have to reveal, explicitly, the names of our pseudonymous writers, some of whom would certainly be fired from their jobs if their identities leaked.

But we are still required to produce 40 gigabytes of emails, an enormous amount. And of course these would in fact reveal the names of those pseudonymous writers, as well as our donors, privileged communications with lawyers etc.
Judge Kraus has also now allowed us to redact these emails. But this is a huge task, which our lawyers estimate could cost as much as $150,000.

An observer tells us this order is more typical of major corporate litigation, not a tiny charity.
And, perversely, although Judge Kraus has now modified her January 23 2023 order, she is nevertheless now fining us $250 a day for not complying with it.

We have fought NYAG Letitia James, at a cost of up to $1 million, for nearly three years. But now we are literally hanging on the cross.
REMEMBER, VDARE.com HAS NOT BEEN CHARGED WITH ANYTHING—BECAUSE IT IS NOT GUILTY OF ANYTHING.
There is no legitimate explanation for NYAG’ James enormous fishing expedition—other than a desire to nail us to the cross with compliance costs. The process is the punishment.

NYAG James has claimed to be interested in our
purchase of the Berkeley Springs Castle as a conference venue. But this transaction was expensively lawyered and is bullet-proof. Significantly, NYAG James has refused to meet with our expensive lawyers to discuss it.
The victims of crucifixion
typically took a long time to die. (Christ was an exception).

All our resources are now focused on our death struggle. VDARE.com will continue publishing on a reduced schedule as long as it can, at least until after our April 26-28 conference.

But , as Christ said on the cross, “
it is finished.”

The suppression of VDARE.com’s voice, at a time when the immigration debate is moving to a climax, is of course a political scandal.
But, on a personal level, I might also observe that VDARE.com was an entirely viable 24/7 opinion convenience store. I had hoped to leave it to my young wife and our children after I am gone. Now it appears, thanks to Letitia James, that this will not be possible. They will need some other means of support.

Nevertheless, I’m immensely grateful for VDARE.com’s much loved readers and supporters over these many years.
We hope to see you on the other side.
 
with the current situation at the border the time is ripe for people who can afford it to just accept being called racist and move the fuck on. John Derbyshire wasn't literally tarred and feathered, even Kevin McDonald and EMJ still have houses and stuff.
That's not what's going to happen.
VDARE's twitter indicates they are prepared to shut down operations before giving up names.
 
That's not what's going to happen.
VDARE's twitter indicates they are prepared to shut down operations before giving up names.
it doesn't matter what an ancient web 1.0 website does or does not do

it's been an open secret that the dissident right or whatever you want to call these people has broad support but nobody wants to admit it because people are too skeered that they'll lose their dumb jobs

but it's not 2008. Being called a racist in public just isn't the threat that it used to be.
 
it doesn't matter what an ancient web 1.0 website does or does not do

it's been an open secret that the dissident right or whatever you want to call these people has broad support but nobody wants to admit it because people are too skeered that they'll lose their dumb jobs

but it's not 2008. Being called a racist in public just isn't the threat that it used to be.
vdare has/had some heavy donors. they would absolutely be blacklisted if they were revealed.
 
but it's not 2008. Being called a racist in public just isn't the threat that it used to be.
For public perception, no, but public perception means very little when you can be blackballed from banks so the public cannot pay you, and every major part of the webstack so the public can no longer read you.
If Kanye's wealth cannot protect him from the wrath of these people, nobody's can.
It will require legal reforms, and those will probably start in the UK, not the US, thanks to what was done to Farage.
 
No doubt VDARE is run by a grifter.
They've done great work focusing on immigration for decades now. To call them grifters is ridiculous.

Being called a racist in public just isn't the threat that it used to be.
If they have something to lose, that's a bad place to be. There are a dozen other ethnicities gunning for anything like that to plant their flags on.
 
This is more grandstanding by Leticia James in preparation for her Presidential campaign of 2028.

  • She took out Cuomo for the Dems so he couldn't run against Kamala or another POC for President
  • She took out the NRA
  • She's trying to be the one to say she took out Trump
  • She's crusading for Climate Justice by targeting the beef industry
  • Now she's crusading for migrants and open borders
This is not the first time she's done the last point. A year ago she refused to support Kathy Hoschul, and would not allow her office to represent the State of NY in a case against NYC busing migrants to Upstate cities, because she believes "housing is a human right" and towns all over NYS should have to house millions of refugees at local expense.

She is setting herself up to be a Super Liberal Democrat with national recognition, and when 2028 is an open field next election, she will run, mark my words.

I believe she has support in the DNC too, because she briefly ran against Hoschul for Governor after she took out Cuomo, but quickly dropped out. I bet somebody told her to just use the AG office to build her cred, and maybe she's been promised a position in Biden's 2024 Cabinet if he wins.

But how would she take down Newsom, in his inevitable 2028 Presidential campaign?
 
They've done great work focusing on immigration for decades now. To call them grifters is ridiculous.
This could be a long argument about definitions and moral values etc but I think if you make money commenting about politics you are a grifter. Not that this is always bad. People like to make money, which is fine but it means certain things. You may truly in believe in something and work to further it but making a profit off of it means you are sacrificing some of what you believe in for money.

Buying a castle is not something I look too favorably upon.

Politics is certainly quite gray, though so you can't expect anything near moral perfection.
 
In other words "We the court, totally pinky-promise, we swear, that the names of donors, vendors and contributors will  never be leaked, perhaps by some activist paralegal or through a "random unrelated hack". That will totally never happen, we guarantee it! ( tee-hee! 😉 ) And even if it DID HAPPEN why on earth would anybody want to retaliate against these leaked names?!"
IMO this nonsensical hand-waving flies in the face of such SCOTUS cases as NAACP v. Alabama and, more recently, Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (protecting the anonymity of donors to 501(c)(4) and 501(c)(3) organizations respectively).

Also let's just say if this is a bent judge, these sleazeballs will be able to leak shit with impunity because the court will do jack-shit.
 
This could be a long argument about definitions and moral values etc but I think if you make money commenting about politics you are a grifter. Not that this is always bad. People like to make money, which is fine but it means certain things. You may truly in believe in something and work to further it but making a profit off of it means you are sacrificing some of what you believe in for money.

I think this is kind of a ridiculous standard to expect. Unless you're independently wealthy you can't be expected to do things for free for fear of "grifting". The term "Grifting" really gets watered down when it is reduced to "Money is involved somehow".
 
IMO this nonsensical hand-waving flies in the face of such SCOTUS cases as NAACP v. Alabama and, more recently, Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (protecting the anonymity of donors to 501(c)(4) and 501(c)(3) organizations respectively).

Also let's just say if this is a bent judge, these sleazeballs will be able to leak shit with impunity because the court will do jack-shit.
The current SCOTUS bench doesn't even want to enforce its own Bruen ruling, openly hinted it's going to overturn Bantam for god's sake.
They've been quietly enabling this kind of corruption of court procedure for ages, exponentially emboldening corrupt lower judges.
 
The reason I posted the Article isn't the grifting discussion but it is worth talking about a little bit but this is the last thing I will say on it.
I think this is kind of a ridiculous standard to expect. Unless you're independently wealthy you can't be expected to do things for free for fear of "grifting".
Correct

This is one of the major challenges of Politics. How do you get things done without corruption? This is not a problem that can be avoided only engineered around.

My usage of Grifter is descriptive rather than prescriptive. My point wasn't that I was happy this was happening to VDARE, but that they were doing something a little gray and they have less room to be angry at somebody doing something gray to them.

I thought the nominal purpose of the castle was as a retreat center, not a personal home for the founder.
VDARE probably shouldn't be buying that Castle and they probably could have put that money towards something more useful.
 
But how would she take down Newsom, in his inevitable 2028 Presidential campaign?
He certainly has his supporters in the Democrat Party, like Nancy Pelosi. But James is a black female woman of color POC. She would be the preferred candidate due to optics over a straight white male.

I believe this is why she was directed to take out Cuomo. There is a large part of the DNC so tied to identity politics they never want to run a straight white male again.
 
VDARE probably shouldn't be buying that Castle and they probably could have put that money towards something more useful.
Hindsight is 20/20.

I have some personal cows who bought a former troubled youth camp with the goal of making it a generational family compound and epicenter of life and culture in the middle of Tennessee. They're selling it now and I think it's partly because none of their adult children's spouses want to live 100 feet from their megalomaniac father-in-law.

But I digress.

A lot of wealthy people, corporations, foundations, whatever buy a chunk of land to use as a personal retreat. And a lot of how they manage and promote that land is important.

I'm sure whatever year the Bohemian Club bought the grove, there were people telling them this was a stupid investment. Is the grove "useful" to the club? Hell yeah it is, it keeps them relevant as a secret society in 2024. 🦉

The Scientology Celebrity Center is ridiculous and stupid, and it sucks people in.

Mar-A-Lago attracts people who want to shit in a gold toilet, and it turns out there are more than a few of them.

Yeah, the smart mind says he should have bought 5,000 acres in Idaho, but the clever mind says that branding and proximity matter.

The clever mind says that 5,000 acres in Idaho is going to make you the kind of friends who are already in Greater Idaho and who want to camp out on some guy's ranch and talk TND for $150 a night, whereas a fancy, exclusive destination within a day's drive of a fifth of the American population, including the wealthy, educated, strategic American population, makes a lot more sense.

Edit: Would you rather get your shit pushed in by Letetia James or Janet Reno?
 
Last edited:
Back