- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
It's ok if you want to "soul bond" with Chris, bud. I'm not here to judge you.
BABSCon banned Chris, leaks emails
- Thread starter Ammyterasu
- Start date
Cpt. Stud Beefpile
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2022
What kind of retarded ween bullcrap is this to frame it like a goddamn trophy?
Like it took any kind of bravery to ban his literal motherfucking ass? LOOOL!
Like it took any kind of bravery to ban his literal motherfucking ass? LOOOL!
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2022
$40 for 13-17 year olds? What kind of rapists would charge their victims for the privilige? Truly we live in clownworld.
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2024
The ban is illegal according to the ADA (The Americans With Disabilities Act), The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other legal diplomas. It's funny how the organizers put the blame on Chris for the incident when they had the duty to protect, guide, and accommodate Chris at the event and they failed at it on a spectacular level.
Give me all the stickers you guys want, but Chris is disabled , BABScon don’t abide by KF rules and values that kinda work on a semi-marginal parts of society. If you preach inclusivity and diversity, which is mandated by law for any bussiness, you need to be able to accommodate all types of guests, including Chris-chan. 100% ez case for a lawsuit.
Give me all the stickers you guys want, but Chris is disabled , BABScon don’t abide by KF rules and values that kinda work on a semi-marginal parts of society. If you preach inclusivity and diversity, which is mandated by law for any bussiness, you need to be able to accommodate all types of guests, including Chris-chan. 100% ez case for a lawsuit.
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2014
Maybe they thought they could get sued for "discrimination" for banning someone of the LGBTQ+ "community", yet still took that risk?
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2024
Blacklight
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2020
I honestly wouldn't put it past Chris to try and sneak himself inside the conference.
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2014
What are you talking about? The whole point here is that they told Chris to fuck off with a full ticket refund a month before the event because he would violate their code of conduct, with the code itself establishing they have the right to do this:
and
Which leads to the Harassment Policy:
Remember that Chris is popping off on twitter every time he sees something related to G5, calling it Russian propaganda. At a pony convention where there likely would be a bunch of G5 around? Chris wouldn't be able to not verbally attack people.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2013
No it isn't, you spastic mongoloid. Conventions are private affairs, essentially by invitation only. When a party buys a ticket they're buying an invite. The convention can ban them for whatever reason they want as long as it isn't something legally actionable like "You're banned because you're a nigger/cripple/faggot/Jewish!" And even if it were a normal business, the ADA and all that other shit doesn't give retards and gender special freaks special treatment. All it does is tell businesses and other entities that they need to have or offer a few accommodations like wheelchair ramps so that disabled people can have the same access and receive the same treatment as normal able bodied people. It doesn't protect them from ever getting banned from places. Seriously, shut the fuck up and stop embarrassing yourself since you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2021
They did protect, guide and accommodate Chris.
They protected him from making an ass of himself, guided him away from the event and accommodated his god complex by reading his response.
Seriously though everything you said is wrong, but this is your one and only post on KF so I'll just assume you're a dumbass.
Hooked on phobics
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2023
I'm not a lawyer BUT, let me explain why this is wrong.
Discrimination covered under this is if you judge someone PURELY for disability. So if you ban a drooling autistic for drooling, yes, absolutely illegal and covered. HOWEVER, this doesn't mean ANY banned person WITH a disability is protected : this isn't how the law works, NOR is this even the spirit of the law : it protects people for being banned IF they are kicked out / banned, ect, PURELY for disability, and this still even holds reasonable expectations : IE, a severe autistic shrieking endlessly during a movie would probably be asked to leave, because autism doesn't mean you CAN'T be silent, EVEN IF autism might contribute to screaming. It WOULD however enforce wheelchair accessibility, because you cannot reasonably expect a guy in a wheel chair to climb stairs.
Second, chris has....lots of contributing factors that make him different than your average autist. The issues with his mom, harassing women in the past, assault situations, and probably most of all him being "famous" in the worst way, which naturally attracts BS, and makes all his other problems stick out badly.
So no, such lawsuit wouldn't go through.
Also hi chris (seriously, they have 1 post, which is defending chris....seems sus)
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2022
Daily reminder that the ADA is not:
BABSCon participants and personnel are just retards.
- To be used as a shield because some asshole decided to self diagnose as """""disabled"""""
- A get out of jail free card to be used to circumvent other regulations
- A vexatious litigator that signs up a lwayer for everything labelled "disabled"
- An advocacy organization meant to ensure that disabled people do not face undue discrimination for the special needs they require as part of their genuine disability
- An advisory group that helps entities from governments to cons make their facilities and events as accessible to disabled individuals as practically possible
- An association that provides organization and legal muscle to people who have been unjustly discriminated against for their disability status.
BABSCon participants and personnel are just retards.
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2014
It's not Chris, there isn't any weird random capitalization and the word "semi-marginal" is too complex for him to ever use in place of a CWCism.
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2015
That would seem like the current fear of what Chris would do and he is capable of anything when he's in public. And it's true, if he was there, and there was some hot girl hawking G5 stuff, there's no doubt in anyone's mind that it would cause his tardrage to flare up.
Notwithstanding that, Chris also has the benefit of a ban through previous bad behavior. That's reason enough to ban him from somewhere if there's a pattern of consistent bad behavior that has a high likelihood of happening again. Since Chris has been an absolute child about his TooMany Game convention assault, doing his usual childish "it wasn't my fault, it was the trolls, no one told me!" despite ample evidence just means Chris is a huge liability. Now that he has a strikes against him behaviorally, while attending other conventions, if a convention did let him in, and he did the same shit over again, people would scream that there was ample evidence not to have him there.
There's the added benefit of the people he would attract. The general vibe is, sleazy weens from the darkest corners of the internet, or that evil site KiwiFarms, would start showing up to follow Chris around, and potentially cause issues. Places like furry cons especially have had experience with SA goons invading their conventions so they're hyper sensitive to people like that potentially showing up.
It's more of a liability to let him attend a convention than blacklist. What's sad is that these are pretty bottom tier conventions, the pony and the furries, and Chris still managed to fuck it all up.
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2021
Aol is fine. When you're still using hotmail is when concern begins to form
Kirby
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2015
he was banned because he repeatedly raped an 85 year old woman with dementia for over a year
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2014
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2014
Is it bigger than him REEing at "blarms"?
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Not a fuck, unless Finland radically differs from the rest of Western Europe in that respect. Unless a foreigner is there to work or one of the idle rich, they generally do not want him around.
About ten years ago Germany didn't even want their own citizens back if they became eligible for welfare while working overseas.
Germany also disenfranchises citizens living in other countries (unless they return every 5 years to live there "for a significant amount of time")