Android Raptor wants you to know how much she hates conservative Christians for the billionth time

Sex ed is not stranger danger. A kindergartner doesn't need to know what anal is.

When I was a child, I learned that someone fondling me was not okay. However, I was not taught how to give a blowjob.

Understanding what is/is not okay does not require comprehensive understanding of the subject until an acceptable age is reached. If you introduce it too early, you normalize experimentation and sodomy.
Good thing no one is teaching kindergartners about anal and blowjobs in schools
 
Good thing no one is teaching kindergartners about anal and blowjobs in schools
Ignored the point.

FYI the point is that you, a sodomite who wants to kill children, gives the rest of us advice on raising them.
You are admittedly mentally ill and desire to brutally murder children. Not just aborting "clumps of cells" but living, breathing, post-birth children.

If you really are a threat to others, you belong in a padded cell. Nobody on a cocktail of medications for mental illnesses who is having thoughts of murdering kids should be near any of them.

Kindly check yourself into a psych ward before you crush a child's skull.
I don't care what your mother did to you. Nobody else does either.
 
Last edited:
Ignored the point.
No, she just didn't address it because thar would be antithetical to her misology. The way this works, afaik, is that you're not allowed to consider any viewpoints contrary to the human capacity for bodily autonomy except for the singular viewpoint that all human beings should have 100% bodily autonomy so long as that falls outside the category of oppresor and oppressed.
(i.e., rape is not evil when it happens to people one doesn't like.)

To be clear: AR chooses to be ignorant.
So, here's a fun little experiment.

Try to tailor your points as if you're talking to someone below 80 IQ (e.g., imagine AR has the reading capacity of a 10 year old). I only reference this because it this is supposedly the level of intelligence that limits one's perceptions a world beyond the limitationsif an oppressor/oppressed dichotomy.

If AR continues to miss the point, lower the IQ and make your comments more concise. Now, as soon as you've reached the point where AR can't do low IQ obfuscation anymore (i.e., when ignoring the point becomes most obviou) then you'll realize how useless any mode of argumentation.
 
If AR continues to miss the point, lower the IQ and make your comments more concise. Now, as soon as you've reached the point where AR can't do low IQ obfuscation anymore (i.e., when ignoring the point becomes most obviou) then you'll realize how useless any mode of argumentation.
I don't try anymore. It takes too much effort and no matter how low you go she's still a brainlet.
 
Good thing no one is teaching kindergartners about anal and blowjobs in schools
@SSj_Ness look at this faggot pretending she didn't JUST defend people trying to do that :story:
Try to tailor your points as if you're talking to someone below 80 IQ (e.g., imagine AR has the reading capacity of a 10 year old). I only reference this because it this is supposedly the level of intelligence that limits one's perceptions a world beyond the limitationsif an oppressor/oppressed dichotomy.
I was in sped
It's not "as if," you are talking to a sub 80-IQ. At best.
 
I like them as much as any other group of humans. Some are bad people, others are my friends.
Groups of humans can be described by statistics, fortunately. That indeed allows some individuals to be in the extremities of the bell curve, but most simply are stuck in the stereotypical middle.
I've had good relations with the few blacks I met too, but it doesn't really mean much. Failure to notice patterns leads to disaster.
Also, you recognize the value of statistical data, as you often mention the probability of some woman being murdered or raped and so on.
 
I don't try anymore. It takes too much effort and no matter how low you go she's still a brainlet.
I mean, your last post contained a hypothetical. Remember, you're probably dealing with someone who might not even understand the subjunctive "what if you didn't eat breakfast" sorts of statements or questions.

Remember, all they know is oppressed and oppressor. That's it. Unless you're addressing a conversation under that dichotomy, she won't understand you.
 
I mean, your last post contained a hypothetical. Remember, you're probably dealing with someone who might not even understand the subjunctive "what if you didn't eat breakfast" sorts of statements or questions.

Remember, all they know is oppressed and oppressor. That's it. Unless you're addressing a conversation under that dichotomy, she won't understand you.
Complex ideas can't be expressed in single instances of binary. She can't remember what she's responding to, she'll never remember the last 20 oppressor/oppresseds ago.
 
Uhhhhh...
Herzog and FauxNews, lmao

Got anything that's not a propaganda outlet known for making shit up?
Groups of humans can be described by statistics, fortunately. That indeed allows some individuals to be in the extremities of the bell curve, but most simply are stuck in the stereotypical middle.
I've had good relations with the few blacks I met too, but it doesn't really mean much. Failure to notice patterns leads to disaster.
Also, you recognize the value of statistical data, as you often mention the probability of some woman being murdered or raped and so on.
Most of the people that have been shitty to me have been white. I've noticed that pattern.
 
Last edited:
FYI the point is that you, a sodomite who wants to kill children


IMG_2097.gif
 
Back