‘I’m 28. And I’m Scheduled to Die in May.’ - Some right-to-die activists want everyone to have access to euthanasia—even young people with mental illness. Are they also making suicide contagious?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Zoraya ter Beek, 28, expects to be euthanized in early May.

Her plan, she said, is to be cremated.

“I did not want to burden my partner with having to keep the grave tidy,” ter Beek texted me. “We have not picked an urn yet, but that will be my new house!”

She added an urn emoji after “house!”

Ter Beek, who lives in a little Dutch town near the German border, once had ambitions to become a psychiatrist, but she was never able to muster the will to finish school or start a career. She said she was hobbled by her depression and autism and borderline personality disorder. Now she was tired of living—despite, she said, being in love with her boyfriend, a 40-year-old IT programmer, and living in a nice house with their two cats.

She recalled her psychiatrist telling her that they had tried everything, that “there’s nothing more we can do for you. It’s never gonna get any better.”

At that point, she said, she decided to die. “I was always very clear that if it doesn’t get better, I can’t do this anymore.”

As if to advertise her hopelessness, ter Beek has a tattoo of a “tree of life” on her upper left arm, but “in reverse.”

“Where the tree of life stands for growth and new beginnings,” she texted, “my tree is the opposite. It is losing its leaves, it is dying. And once the tree died, the bird flew out of it. I don’t see it as my soul leaving, but more as myself being freed from life.”

Her liberation, as it were, will take place at her home. “No music,” she said. “I will be going on the couch in the living room.”

She added: “The doctor really takes her time. It is not that they walk in and say: lay down please! Most of the time it is first a cup of coffee to settle the nerves and create a soft atmosphere. Then she asks if I am ready. I will take my place on the couch. She will once again ask if I am sure, and she will start up the procedure and wish me a good journey. Or, in my case, a nice nap, because I hate it if people say, ‘Safe journey.’ I’m not going anywhere.”

Then the doctor will administer a sedative, followed by a drug that will stop ter Beek’s heart.

When she’s dead, a euthanasia review committee will evaluate her death to ensure the doctor adhered to “due care criteria,” and the Dutch government will (almost certainly) declare that the life of Zoraya ter Beek was lawfully ended.

She’s asked her boyfriend to be with her to the very end.

There won’t be any funeral. She doesn’t have much family; she doesn’t think her friends will feel like going. Instead, her boyfriend will scatter her ashes in “a nice spot in the woods” that they have chosen together, she said.

“I’m a little afraid of dying, because it’s the ultimate unknown,” she said. “We don’t really know what’s next—or is there nothing? That’s the scary part.”

Ter Beek is one of a growing number of people across the West choosing to end their lives rather than live in pain. Pain that, in many cases, can be treated.

Typically, when we think of people who are considering assisted suicide, we think of people facing terminal illness. But this new group is suffering from other syndromes—depression or anxiety exacerbated, they say, by economic uncertainty, the climate, social media, and a seemingly limitless array of fears and disappointments.

“I’m seeing euthanasia as some sort of acceptable option brought to the table by physicians, by psychiatrists, when previously it was the ultimate last resort,” Stef Groenewoud, a healthcare ethicist at Theological University Kampen, in the Netherlands, told me. “I see the phenomenon especially in people with psychiatric diseases, and especially young people with psychiatric disorders, where the healthcare professional seems to give up on them more easily than before.”

Theo Boer, a healthcare ethics professor at Protestant Theological University in Groningen, served for a decade on a euthanasia review board in the Netherlands. “I entered the review committee in 2005, and I was there until 2014,” Boer told me. “In those years, I saw the Dutch euthanasia practice evolve from death being a last resort to death being a default option.” He ultimately resigned.

Boer had in mind people like Zoraya ter Beek—who, critics argue, have been tacitly encouraged to kill themselves by laws that destigmatize suicide, a social media culture that glamorizes it, and radical right-to-die activists who insist we should be free to kill ourselves whenever our lives are “complete.”

They have fallen victim, in critics’ eyes, to a kind of suicide contagion.

Statistics suggest these critics have a point.

In 2001, the Netherlands became the first country in the world to make euthanasia legal. Since then, the number of people who increasingly choose to die is startling.

Article | Archive
 
It’s either that or the psychiatrist can’t be bothered to do her job, thus pawns this woman off to commit suicide instead so that she doesn’t have to continue figuring out solutions for her. In other words, she has absolutely zero empathy and should immediately have her license revoked.
In ten years we're going to find out that the Canadian government actively pushed for suicide above her there long-term fixes. In thirty years it will come out that ethnicity was a large determining factor in this push.
 
In ten years we're going to find out that the Canadian government actively pushed for suicide above her there long-term fixes. In thirty years it will come out that ethnicity was a large determining factor in this push.
No doubt but note well, this particular article is about the Netherlands. They and Belgium also have "robust" euthanasia programs already.

It's awful what she's doing to her cats and to any elderly relatives or siblings she has. I'd say it's awful to do it to her boyfriend, but he's free to peace out whenever and if he had any sense of self-preservation he would have by now.

When my elderly cat got sick and went for a car ride to the vet that ended up being one way, my dog grieved deeply. She searched everywhere for the cat, even after I showed her the empty crate and let her sniff the terminal cancer smells in it. She rolled her ball down the hall, and whined when the cat didn't pop out to bat it back, like old times. She took to her bed inside her crate and wouldn't come out. She finally refused her dinner, then breakfast, until I let her have some fresh cooked rice which is her biggest vice.

Since then it has graphically haunted me how messed up a pet would be by the master never coming home one day.
 
Man, this is fucking vile. I'm not against euthanasia as a last resort for people who are severely crippled or near death, but now people who are depressed are encouraged to kill themselves. Ironically you never hear third world immigrants going through these treatments. Her boyfriend even agreed with this shit, it doesn't get any more clown world than this.
The slippery slope is not a fallacy at this point.
 
look medically assisted suicide is disgusting if you're going to kill yourself do it by yourself and only buy yourself and don't involve anybody else in your own death in don't have that way on other people's conscience
7bf0c427-48df-41f9-bc0c-b31cbd552a53_text.gif

but now people who are depressed are encouraged to kill themselves.
Oh sure, but when  I say "KYS" online ssociety gets mad at ME!
 
At least wait until your cats die, you owe them that. You may hate yourself but your cats probably love you because they don't know any better.

I can't imagine orphaning my cats. They're very bonded to me. She can't live for her boyfriend. She can't live for her cats and she can't live for herself. She fails at life and the medical system is failing her.

Allowing euthanasia for non-terminal illnesses sets a very bad precedent. Pretty soon they'll be convincing the poor and elderly that they should die because reasons and everyone will act like it's totally normal and ok to Soylent Green grandpa because his hip went and it costs more to kill him then to heal him. The genie will not be going back in the bottle on this one.
 
In ten years we're going to find out that the Canadian government actively pushed for suicide above her there long-term fixes. In thirty years it will come out that ethnicity was a large determining factor in this push.
assuming canada will exist in 30 years ,

anyway I have myriad of diagnoses and i got really really lucky to get the proper meds mix plus therapy. I get it , its hell and I dont blame anyone involved for this.

But I definetly understand why someone wants to yeet itself after godknows how many tries of meds and therapy. Many psych meds have horrible side effects. I do think people should have the right to yeet themselves whenever they want after they tried lordknows how many therapies and meds, if nothing works why condemn a person to terrible pain. We put down cats and dogs when they suffer terribly but somehow its a no no for humans.
 
This should be a cause for concern for anyone who has a modicum of empathy. Unfortunately, it's a feature - tauting suicide as austerity-motivated healthcare. Why spend the money on a societal drain when they can just kill themselves? Awesome!

No jobs in the market? Getting priced out of your community as rent keeps going up and wages (as if you have a job LOLOL) are stagnating? Just McFucking Kill Yourself, because we sure as shit aren't going to improve the standard of living for you lowly maggots.
People used to fight through adversity now they are just killing themselves. Clearly the sign of a healthy society regardless of the country!
 
I don't think people should have the right to just die because they are sick of living. These people are just too cowardly to take their own life and just want someone else to do it. They want to put that off on someone else and it's not right. I am sure there are some people out there screwed up enough to do it though especially when money comes into the equation.

I do however support death with dignity . People with terminal illnesses or illnesses that will severely degrade their quality of life should have the right to choose a more dignified way to die than the horrific end that will happen to them. I have seen several people die of cancer and it was not pretty. Animals as well. But people have their animals put down, at least the ones with some decency. The real weirdos are the ones that make the animals suffer. Just like it's the real weirdos that want to make humans suffer. Once the medical industry gets done making money off your misery and suffering to no avail then they turn you over to the death industry where they milk you for even more money if you have it. Usually preying on the emotions of family members. People should have the right to a quick painless dignified death. But only for certain cases. This would be seen as a merciful killing. Not helping someone commit suicide because they are sick of life.

If you are tired of living and want to take the easy way out the only thing stopping it is your own cowardice.
 
Ironically you never hear third world immigrants going through these treatments.
Because third world shitholes don't offer their people assisted suicide. Third world immigrants kill themselves the "normal" way.

There are lots of barbaric practices in the western world. State sponsored suicide for physically healthy people is one of them.
 
A psychiatrist's job is to prevent their patients from killing themselves
A psychiatrist's job is to treat mental illnesses. A person who is suicidal but not mentally ill is not someone you can treat outside of their situational depression by medicating. It doesn't solve the problem and those antidepressants come with a litany of unwelcome side effects.
your body belongs to you, you have a right to die, but neither the state nor the pseudoscientific cult known as psychiatry should play any affirmative role in that decision

look medically assisted suicide is disgusting if you're going to kill yourself do it by yourself and only buy yourself and don't involve anybody else in your own death in don't have that way on other people's conscience

They keep taking away access to methods that are effective and painless to people (eg. nembutal) and forcing them to go to methods that traumatize other people via exposure and leaving a huge mess that's expensive to clean up. The government being involved would fucking help us get the painless death we desire. The people involved in assisted suicide aren't crying themselves to sleep every night. They're either sympathetic or psychopaths. I don't care. They give us the help we need.

I don't think people should have the right to just die because they are sick of living. These people are just too cowardly to take their own life and just want someone else to do it. They want to put that off on someone else and it's not right.
We want to do it ourselves but again, not given many good fucking options that don't traumatize others or potentially leave us crippled and becoming a permanent burden upon others with disability.
 
She’s an attention whore who has been baiting a while.
but he's free to peace out whenever and if he had any sense of self-preservation he would have by now.
I would refuse to be there. I’d take the cats and change the locks.
We all have the right to end our lives, and I’m uneasy with people being prosecuted for say abetting a terminal loved one’s suicide. But what’s abhorrent is the state being involved. There was an article on here a while back with some of the doctors who actually do the killing in Canada. One had killed four hundred people and was looking forward to more. That is not alright. There should be no official state sponsored and abetted suicide programs. People should and are free to off themselves any time they like. I do t blame anyone who is going to die in agony taking an easier way out, but the state offing healthy people is wrong on all levels
 
Back