Opinion What If Queer Chosen Families Are Cornerstones for God’s Kin-dom?

Link (Archive)

What If Queer Chosen Families Are Cornerstones for God’s Kin-dom?​

“The community of believers was of one mind and one heart. None of them claimed anything as their own; rather, everything was held in common […] nor was anyone needy among them, for those who owned property or houses would sell them and give the money to the apostles. It was then distributed to any members who might be in need.” (Acts 4:32, The Inclusive Lectionary)

Particular readings from the church’s lectionary feel like a time capsule, bringing me back to the moment when I last heard them. Due to the three-year cycle of readings, today’s scriptures were last proclaimed in Catholic churches on the Second Sunday of Easter in 2021.

During the first week of Easter 2021, my wife had given birth—not to our baby, but to the child of her best friend. My wife had spent the past 40 weeks as a gestational carrier (more commonly known as a “surrogate”) for her best friend, who was born without a uterus due to a rare condition. This friend had eggs; her husband provided sperm; and my wife offered the womb that housed and nurtured their child from embryo to infant.

The decision to become a gestational carrier was a simple one for my wife. She knew her friend’s deep sense of calling to become a parent, and she knew that we had the emotional and physical resources necessary to make that dream a reality. My wife believed, like the early disciples in Acts, that the gifts God had given her–in this case, her body’s ability to nurture an embryo and fetus–weren’t hers alone, but were intended to be used for the common good.

I recall reading the scripture passage quoted above on that Second Sunday in Easter, when we celebrated a pandemic-initiated Liturgy of the Word in our home. Throughout the reading, we passed baby Henry back and forth between the parents, grandparents, and friends. My wife pumped breastmilk, which I prepared in a bottle, and Henry’s father fed him.

Grandparents washed dishes, prepared meals for the adults, and folded onesies. Everyone was “of one mind and one heart,” focused on caring for one another and for this new life. All tasks, responsibilities, and concerns were shared. When my wife’s ducts began to clog painfully with milk, the grandmothers hovered around her with remedies and comfort. When the new parents were running low on sleep, energy, and patience, another member of our little household stepped in to soothe and hold the baby.

I recalled hearing about friends’ experiences of the first few weeks of parenthood as exhausting, terrifying, and lonely. Tiring though those weeks were for all of us, we experienced a beautiful sense of common purpose and mutual care. In community, we had enough – enough hands, enough energy, enough wisdom, and enough love to buoy one another.

I have come to believe that God has gifted the world with everything necessary for all of us to thrive. There is enough food for everyone, if only we would share it with the hungry. We have enough creativity, if only we would apply it to the problems our communities face. And we have enough love to warm each lonely heart, if only we would reach out to those around us.

The early community of Jesus’ followers in Jerusalem experienced this sense of sufficiency. Acts of the Apostles tells us that no one was “needy” among them. All of their needs were met, because everyone gave generously according to their abilities, and received according to their needs. This experience of plenty is only possible in community.

Today is known as “Divine Mercy Sunday.” Psalm 118, which we pray at Mass, celebrates God’s mercy, while signaling that we often experience it communally:

“Let the house of Israel say, ‘God’s mercy endures forever.’
Let the house of Aaron say, ‘God’s mercy endures forever.’”

The psalmist does not turn to individuals to bear witness to God’s faithfulness. No, the psalmist looks to households and families, exhorting them to testify to God’s mercy to them. Perhaps the psalmist knows that we experience divine mercy in the context of community, through the sharing of our gifts with one another.

The psalm continues by proclaiming, “The stone which the builders rejected has become the cornerstone.” This statement, often associated prophetically with Jesus, declares that God particularly delights in using the gifts of those who are unrecognized and undervalued. All too often, LGBTQ+ folks are that “stone which the builders rejected.”

Our cultures overlook the contributions of non-traditional families, single people, and queer households, assuming that we are poor building blocks for society. If the goal is to build a society of isolated, self-sufficient nuclear families, that may be true. But what if God is inviting us to build something much more wonderful: an interdependent kin-dom in which all of our gifts are used, and all of our needs are met? What if our queer chosen families, in all their beautifully diverse forms, are the cornerstone?
 
I was laughing at the idea of a Trad Tranny Polycule, where they trade up their cat ears and programing socks for badly fitting summer dresses and plastic cupcakes, but then... you know what? Fine. Obviously almost nothing in the article is right, but if the outcome is that chaotic people discover structure in their lives that pulls them back from the brink of total self-destruction, that's a good thing. If you have to twist the meaning of stuff into knots to get them to hang on to the rope rather than tie it round their neck, that's also a net positive simply because some of them will keep climbing up and out. Nothing else is working with them, let's face it.
 
But what if God is inviting us to build something much more wonderful: an interdependent kin-dom in which all of our gifts are used, and all of our needs are met? What if our queer chosen families, in all their beautifully diverse forms, are the cornerstone?
What if the moon were really made of green cheese?
What if the earth is actually flat?
What if trannies weren't sexual predators and pedophiles?

These are similarly stupid questions.
 
I recall reading the scripture passage
I hope the author recalls that the word "queer" never appear once. And not even the early Christian community as described in Acts 4 told the followers to cut off their parents or spouses to join the "Chosen" family.

All too often, LGBTQ+ folks are that “stone which the builders rejected.”
The fact that one piece of rejected stone became the cornerstone does not mean all rejected pieces of stone has the potential. LGBTQs are not known for being constructive, and they might be more appropriately be tied with millstones.
 
Last edited:
None of this makes any fucking sense to the argument made. A nice story and then a last minute "oh yeah, queers are ideal Christians!"

"queer" isn't even an identity but a counter cultural movement. This whole ridiculous article is something.

Was the "friend" a troon by any chance? I can't help but notice the theme of this article and that random story/detail about his wife. I mean it did claim "she had eggs" but that could easily be twisted to mean anything.
 
During the first week of Easter 2021, my wife had given birth—not to our baby, but to the child of her best friend. My wife had spent the past 40 weeks as a gestational carrier (more commonly known as a “surrogate”) for her best friend, who was born without a uterus due to a rare condition. This friend had eggs; her husband provided sperm; and my wife offered the womb that housed and nurtured their child from embryo to infant.
lol, unless his wife had already gave you kids then you are the king of cucks.

Grandparents washed dishes, prepared meals for the adults, and folded onesies. Everyone was “of one mind and one heart,” focused on caring for one another and for this new life. All tasks, responsibilities, and concerns were shared. When my wife’s ducts began to clog painfully with milk, the grandmothers hovered around her with remedies and comfort. When the new parents were running low on sleep, energy, and patience, another member of our little household stepped in to soothe and hold the baby.
Before urban society this was the norm. Not the bullshit every parent to himself today.

There is enough food for everyone, if only we would share it with the hungry
Except "the hungry" would kill you in return and rape your wife because they aren't forced to make their own food.

The psalm continues by proclaiming, “The stone which the builders rejected has become the cornerstone.” This statement, often associated prophetically with Jesus, declares that God particularly delights in using the gifts of those who are unrecognized and undervalued. All too often, LGBTQ+ folks are that “stone which the builders rejected.”

Our cultures overlook the contributions of non-traditional families, single people, and queer households, assuming that we are poor building blocks for society. If the goal is to build a society of isolated, self-sufficient nuclear families, that may be true. But what if God is inviting us to build something much more wonderful: an interdependent kin-dom in which all of our gifts are used, and all of our needs are met? What if our queer chosen families, in all their beautifully diverse forms, are the cornerstone?
There is multiple ways it's wrong:
1. You don't specify the other family being LGBTQ, so what's they have to do with it? Nevermind the statistics that those families are massively more abusive.
2. You yourself aren't happy with it, else you wouldn't written a cope article that is basically heresy to gaslight yourself.
3. What that couple did was basically endanger your marriage rather than just accept the hand they were dealt and adopt a child who's in actual distress, or pay some third world to do the same. This makes the article glorification of greediness rather than goodwill.
 
Gotta love Libtard navel-gazing. Its dumb retarded shit that would have floated in Academia and livejournals but instead, they're getting paid to make articles about it.

At least when writing fan fiction, its sometimes fun to read. This makes me want to wretch.
 
If the goal is to build a society of isolated, self-sufficient nuclear families, that may be true.
nuclear families werent isolated, the 40-60s had tons of social groups like elks, knights of columbus, rotary, lions, etc.

But what if God is inviting us to build something much more wonderful: an interdependent kin-dom in which all of our gifts are used, and all of our needs are met? What if our queer chosen families, in all their beautifully diverse forms, are the cornerstone?
queers, queer families didnt exist until 50 years ago so theres no way theyd be a cornerstone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Taco Santo!
This is the future they want. You will not have autonomy, you will brood the gay or Troon baby

Would that be called ‘being a man?’

Hers or stolen?
Condition is called MRKH (Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome). It's a thing but rare. Still wonder if the "friend" is a troon though because of how fucked up the world is today (troons have tied themselves to intersection people so why not congenital glitches).
 
Condition is called MRKH (Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome). It's a thing but rare. Still wonder if the "friend" is a troon though because of how fucked up the world is today (troons have tied themselves to intersection people so why not congenital glitches).
Yeah I know of MRKH. I’m just wondering because of the way it’s written. ‘She has eggs’ not ‘she still has ovaries and so we can use her eggs.’ Has eggs means in possession of eggs.
 
Yeah I know of MRKH. I’m just wondering because of the way it’s written. ‘She has eggs’ not ‘she still has ovaries and so we can use her eggs.’ Has eggs means in possession of eggs.
I interpreted it as the person who wrote the article doesn't know the difference but you bring up a good point too.
 
Back