YouTube Historians/HistoryTube/PopHistory

  • 🔧 Actively working on site again.
Last edited:
Thoughts, gentlemen?
To me he looks to be from the same dreary tribe as PaxTube and ZommerHistorian.

It's not enough to know that some terrible event happened but it must be told in such a black and white manner that there exists little to no chance of nuance or reconsideration. It's easier for schools and mainstream academia to cast the entire era of colonialism under a general blanket of unhinged evil because if the more complicated reality was taught then we would get people potentially developing more critical worldviews that deviate from the expected opinions we're supposed to have.
Schools teach children to be obedient and listen to authority figures unquestioningly, not to think for themselves. So of course if they hear an alternative worldview form a seemingly authoritative figure, they're going to accept it, even more so in their teenage years when they have a desire to rebel against the authority figures they grew up with.
The response to this will be to silence and censor all alternative viewpoints because the other option would be to teach children to weight the options for themselves, and they can't have that.

I'm glad that the history teachers who taught me during my formative years made the effort to constantly point out that there exists more than one version of events and that the common consensus is often too fickle to trust 100% of the time. I remember one time he had an entire class devoted to teaching the Civil War from a purely Union perspective, then the next day from a purely Confederate perspective. Afterward, he asked us what we thought instead of what he thought. Something like that would never happen today sadly.
Now that sounds like excellent and fun way to teaching history. so in that spirit:
After the Belgium government took over they did rule very benevolently
Calling any sort of colonial rule "benevolent" is definitely very one-sided. I'd say a better way to phrase that is that compared to what came previously, they ruled very benevolently.
The aim of European colonial empires was always selfish. If not for monetary or material gain, then for presitge, rivalry with other empires or to carry out their self-proclaimed mission of "civilizing".
The Europeans did build roads, modern housing, introduce medicine and raise standards of living, but it wasn't out of charity, but to turn the natives into more efficient workers. And all that came at the cost of uprooting traditional ways of life, -governance, and beliefs, which causes anomie, which in turn leads to radicalization.
 
Last edited:
Kind of a weird looking guy though. He should drop the silly ties.
He kind of reminds me of Leonardo DiCaprio's character in Django Unchained in a way.

I had always assumed that the relationship and reality of the Congo Free State, Leopold II, and the Belgium government was more analogous to the British East India Company rather than some intentional African holocaust by the Yakubian devil or something.
Calling any sort of colonial rule "benevolent" is definitely very one-sided. I'd say a better way to phrase that is that compared to what came previously, they ruled very benevolently.
The aim of European colonial emoires was always selfish. If not for monetary or material gain, then for presitge, rivalry with other empires or to carry out their self-proclaimed mission of "civilizing".
The Europeans did build roads, modern housing, introduce medicine and raise standards of living, but it wasn't out of charity, but to turn the natives into more efficient workers. And all that came at the cost of uprooting traditional ways of life, -governance, and beliefs, which causes anomie, which in turn leads to radicalization.
That's what people forget about colonialism, it was mostly about business and politics in the end. As long as the colonizer's received returns on their investments they could care less of the well-being of the native populations if it doesn't bring any benefit to them.

To me he looks to be from the same dreary tribe as PaxTube and ZommerHistorian.
I did see Monsieur Z in the comment section of one of his videos, so take that as you will.
 
That's what people forget about colonialism, it was mostly about business and politics in the end. As long as the colonizer's received returns on their investments they could care less of the well-being of the native populations if it doesn't bring any benefit to them.
Honestly I found Bruce Giley's The Case for Colonialism to be fascinating reading.
 
It's been a while, let's see what's Rudy's new video is.....


oh
TL;DW: Society is currently busted because the guys who get sex don't actually care about the women who clamor after them on Tinder, and because the women don't understand that. If there is a revolution, it will start among these guys who are completely brainrot, or some other rich wanker, and not among the actual sexually-frustrated young men because plebs never succeed at anything. Thus, like a revolution, we will switch from a de-facto polygamous society underpinned by women (if you believe Rudyard's stance) to a de-facto polygamous society underpinned by men. Or it won't happen at all, because testosterone is the new magic Aryan blood that allows for organization towards a productive end and we're approaching Mouse Utopia levels of it.

Also Rudyard thinks South Korea will lose 96% of its population in 100 years, rather than the generally-accepted statistic of 50%, either because he's disingenuous or because he has forgotten for THIS video in particular that birthrates have stabilized.

Also White Male Genocide (but not White Female Genocide), perpetrated by other White Men and White Women.

Rudyard should stick to tanks.
 
Last edited:
TL;DW: Society is currently busted because the guys who get sex don't actually care about the women who clamor after them on Tinder, and because the women don't understand that. If there is a revolution, it will start among these guys who are completely brainrot, or some other rich wanker, and not among the actual sexually-frustrated young men because plebs never succeed at anything. Thus, like a revolution, we will switch from a de-facto polygamous society underpinned by women (if you believe Rudyard's stance) to a de-facto polygamous society underpinned by men. Or it won't happen at all, because testosterone is the new magic Aryan blood that allows for organization towards a productive end and we're approaching Mouse Utopia levels of it.

Also Rudyard thinks South Korea will lose 96% of its population in 100 years, rather than the generally-accepted statistic of 50%, either because he's disingenuous or because he has forgotten for THIS video in particular that birthrates have stabilized.

Also White Male Genocide (but not White Female Genocide), perpetrated by other White Men and White Women.

Rudyard should stick to tanks.
From this description alone, it sounds like he needs a GF, get sum fuk, and this is a whole load of projection.
 
From this description alone, it sounds like he needs a GF, get sum fuk, and this is a whole load of projection.
I mean, he opens the video by flexing his vast income and resources, specifically to shoot down that retort early, and he had a fiancé at the time of his "5 nations that will collapse" video.

He even shares a picture of himself that kinda looks like Goebbels.
 
I mean, he opens the video by flexing his vast income and resources, specifically to shoot down that retort early, and he had a fiancé at the time of his "5 nations that will collapse" video.

He even shares a picture of himself that kinda looks like Goebbels.
Dude if you are flexing, that just means you are projecting. Also how many years ago was that video? I can't imagine this sperg keeping a woman for more than a month
 
TL;DW: Society is currently busted because the guys who get sex don't actually care about the women who clamor after them on Tinder, and because the women don't understand that.
This is very much true. Women for some reason(or possibly they dont care and find it preferable to being a mere side piece of a "high value man" v being the main woman of a meh man) do not comprehend most men will happily fuck a woman theyd never date in a million years.

If there is a revolution, it will start among these guys who are completely brainrot, or some other rich wanker, and not among the actual sexually-frustrated young men because plebs never succeed at anything. Thus, like a revolution, we will switch from a de-facto polygamous society underpinned by women (if you believe Rudyard's stance) to a de-facto polygamous society underpinned by men. Or it won't happen at all, because testosterone is the new magic Aryan blood that allows for organization towards a productive end and we're approaching Mouse Utopia levels of it.
I simply cant see it. In the entire history of western civilization going back to the absolute genesis with ancient Greeks polygamy has never been an accepted practice. Any time its occurred, those who practiced have been heavily persecuted. The mormans being a great example.
 
TL;DW: Society is currently busted because the guys who get sex don't actually care about the women who clamor after them on Tinder, and because the women don't understand that. If there is a revolution, it will start among these guys who are completely brainrot, or some other rich wanker, and not among the actual sexually-frustrated young men because plebs never succeed at anything. Thus, like a revolution, we will switch from a de-facto polygamous society underpinned by women (if you believe Rudyard's stance) to a de-facto polygamous society underpinned by men. Or it won't happen at all, because testosterone is the new magic Aryan blood that allows for organization towards a productive end and we're approaching Mouse Utopia levels of it.

Also Rudyard thinks South Korea will lose 96% of its population in 100 years, rather than the generally-accepted statistic of 50%, either because he's disingenuous or because he has forgotten for THIS video in particular that birthrates have stabilized.

Also White Male Genocide (but not White Female Genocide), perpetrated by other White Men and White Women.

Rudyard should stick to tanks.
There's a reason this man has his own thread.
 
In the entire history of western civilization going back to the absolute genesis with ancient Greeks polygamy has never been an accepted practice.
Maybe read more. During the entire period of early Christianity most of the records we have are Priests and Monks complaining all the newly Christian westerners would keep multiple wives and concubines. The practice of concubinage didn't even really go away for the really wealthy even to this day.
Women for some reason(or possibly they dont care and find it preferable to being a mere side piece of a "high value man" v being the main woman of a meh man) do not comprehend most men will happily fuck a woman theyd never date in a million years.
Is your version of reality some off chute of the American Pie movie? Nobody is fucking nowadays. And those "high value" men have better things to do than fuck a 6/10, the people right now fucking are not your highschool sweetheart and your bully but 3/4's out of 10 fucking other 3/4s.
 
1712702718192.png

I could've sworn he made this video already, with the Orthodox topic.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: byuuWasTaken
Back