The problem with your theory is that ",unrepresented parties" is a term of art and "unrepresented counsel" is gibberish, so there's no reasonable likelihood of confusion. I don't think it's fair to attack the justice system because you can't read good, there are plenty of legitimate reasons you don't need to dilute.
But that is how English works. The other guy already explained it better. "Stop all red cars and trucks" has two intepretable meanings: stop all red cars and trucks (regardless of colour), or stop all red cars and red trucks.
Incorrect. He's one of the few employed, working cows we have.
I tried to find good Kanye text-to-speech, but they are limited, and I'm not very good with AI. Could someone please generate it?
I am simply amazed he hasn’t figured out he can spend a disability check on hookers yet. Fascinating.
You're over applying the rule. The case were actually discussing is more like saying "stop all monster trucks and boats" and you're over here smugly asking "what about monster boats" when it isnt even a category.
Fair enough, that makes sense. But the post I was responding to seemed to be implying that "just" flipping a sentence doesn't (or even can't?) make it clearer, which I think is wrong. I wasn't trying to be smug about it.
Bro, you are just here to complain about shit. Please, do, in fact, kill yourself. Go sperg somewhere else.
Nothing.
I stated that in this instance all it did was flip the sentence and not make anything clearer. He very well could have went with "all parties are required to" to remove confusion, or perhaps go with "all represented and unrepresented parties". Whether that is better than the original is, of course, up to you to determine for your own.
No. The order specifically referred to the pending motions that were filed as an after-the-fact objection to transfer.
They remain pending in Florida, and Florida can chose to rule at them at any time (to the extent the Utah issue gets resolved)
Lots of courts have this rule now.
It's not unambiguous. You can't have "unrepresented counsel"......quit trying to make Greer-ish arguments
Make me, janny. Until you grow the balls to banish me to the shadow realm, I will continue to give my incredibly based opinions on each new development with this lawsuit.
Technically what Florida is concerned with is those after the fact motions of "no fair you can't move my case!!!" Given how utterly insane things have been in Utah, the Florida Judge does not want to start acting on a case where Utah may insanely cry "I want it back". This situation is not supposed to be possible. But never discount the power of weapon iced autism.
The most terrifying flavor of iced autism.
We suspect it's a product of his Mormon upbringing.
Yes.
He's too white to get a big disability check, there's nothing left after the mortgage for his new whorehouse
Well, he was also a half-hour late on top of that and had just come from somewhere he could have bought a real HDMI cable.
If a sentence is grammatically ambiguous but one possible interpretation is completely insane, you go with the one that actually makes sense. "Unrepresented parties" and "counsel."
