US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

 

[Absolutego]

And it's been stayed. AG office working overtime to deny legal gun owners their Constitutional rights.

I just want to go shoot Sunny D bottles on the range with my bros for more than 5 minutes without having to reload the mag, it's not like prosecutors in this state would pursue any real charges against someone shooting up a bunch of people unless they're the skinniest skinhead on the planet.

 

[Romulus augustulus]

I just want to go shoot Sunny D bottles on the range with my bros for more than 5 minutes without having to reload the mag, it's not like prosecutors in this state would pursue any real charges against someone shooting up a bunch of people unless they're the skinniest skinhead on the planet.

what the state doesn't know won't hurt them (or you)

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Dude the Deep State is gearing up for a war on America

Did you really think they'd let some rando judge pass something that would allow you to fight back? Look for even more of your rights to defend yourself to be removed for "reasons".

You think that fancy new Army rifle is for killing ragheads and goat herders? It was picked solely to ensure that US forces could be effective against their one true enemy.

The American People

 

[Damocles_Sword]

i think he is Armenian so that'd make him christian (probably). Armenia was the first officially christian country IIRC.
(all based on his one post that says peace for Armenia)

I believe his name is the armenian version of (((Solomon)))

 

[Absolutego]

Dude the Deep State is gearing up for a war on America

Did you really think they'd let some rando judge pass something that would allow you to fight back? Look for even more of your rights to defend yourself to be removed for "reasons".

You think that fancy new Army rifle is for killing ragheads and goat herders? It was picked solely to ensure that US forces could be effective against their one true enemy.

The American People

I understand the concern but Washington state has been retarded on gun rights for years and doesn't get much of anything from the feds at all. NY, IL and CA eat our lunch on the issue, both locally and nationally.
Our current governor all but ran to be Biden's climate change guy and he (ok his handlers) told him to pound sand. Nobody particularly cares about dumb things Washington politicos do, to say nothing of following their example.

 

[Glowing In The Streets]

Another MAGA terrorist!

The FBI decided to use a cheap red cap because Ds would prosecute them for funding Trump if they bought the real maga hat

 

[ForTheHoard]

I understand the concern but Washington state has been retarded on gun rights for years and doesn't get much of anything from the feds at all. NY, IL and CA eat our lunch on the issue, both locally and nationally.
Our current governor all but ran to be Biden's climate change guy and he (ok his handlers) told him to pound sand. Nobody particularly cares about dumb things Washington politicos do, to say nothing of following their example.

Washington actually has pretty decent gun laws for a west coast state. It's the reason I ended up there instead of California. Inslee has been a faggot about it for the last couple years but you can still have suppressors, SBRs, AOWs, destructive devices, etc. The grey/black market is also very active and filled with otherwise law abiding people. I was expecting more people to bitch about the more recent laws but I dont think anyone is following them anyways. Even Chicago's registration program had less than 1% compliance, and Washington has way more red areas with way more legal gun owners.

 

[Absurdist Laughter]

High capacity ammunition is when you make +P rounds and blow your gun up by jamming 600 grains worth of powder on a casing meant for 450.

This sentence low key gives me anxiety. One of my greatest fears is accidentally loading a hot round. I don't need my fully semi automatic rifle blowing its headlight fluid hose.

It's not that they don't know how, it's that "conservative" media sees the right as a greater danger than the left.

I wish I could laugh again, but for the absurd to be funny it mustn't be true. Still gonna laugh anyway, guess I got my wish. I win. #democratlogic

---

I tried to check in on CNN and MSNBC, the later mostly for financial news. Boy oh boy, never have I ever wanted to hear a news report about some dog named Buddy passing away instead of the non-stop propaganda and arctic retarded opinions from talking heads.

 

[Romulus augustulus]

This sentence low key gives me anxiety. One of my greatest fears is accidentally loading a hot round. I don't need my fully semi automatic rifle blowing its headlight fluid hose.

That's why i like to use powders that can't be double charged. its hard to miss powder spilling over the top of the case.

 

[Eggplant Wizard]

Yeah, that's why they started screaming about not being able to say Merry Christmas or disrupt abortion centers by picketing outside the entrances for attention.


I still see Christian churches outside and services being offered every Sunday/Tuesday with the tax exempt privilege of taking people's money for whatever reason. Meanwhile, Christianity lacks the spine to defend their own faith by fedora wearing manchildren because their faith dictates they "turn the other cheek."

Reminder that Jesus struck a man blind. You’re supposed to know when it is time to lash out and when it is time to drop it and move on.

A recurring thought I have about Joe is that he's like a parody of Trump. He (or in this case in campaign people) will do things that I feel is Trump-esque.
View attachment 5885922
Bragging about raising money is something I would expect from Trump, "Look how much money we've raised. We're winning." I don't get who this tweet is for.

Didn’t Trump win with less cash than Hillary? I recall that being one of the biggest burns in history, from a financial perspective.

 

[Overly Serious]

Didn’t Trump win with less cash than Hillary? I recall that being one of the biggest burns in history, from a financial perspective.

Correct. Her campaign out-spent him by a large margin. Additionally the break down of the donors was substantially different with a much larger proportion of Trump's donations coming from regular folks and the big companies paying huge sums to Hilary's campaign. God alone knows how many backroom promises were broken when she didn't get in. Well, God and Devil seeing as the latter probably brokered them.

I have a graphic showing the breakdown in donations between the two campaigns saved somewhere, but it might take me a while to find.

 

[Damocles_Sword]

Correct. Her campaign out-spent him by a large margin. Additionally the break down of the donors was substantially different with a much larger proportion of Trump's donations coming from regular folks and the big companies paying huge sums to Hilary's campaign. God alone knows how many backroom promises were broken when she didn't get in. Well, God and Devil seeing as the latter probably brokered them.

I have a graphic showing the breakdown in donations between the two campaigns saved somewhere, but it might take me a while to find.

The Hillary campaign is going to go down as one of history's greatest blunders. Bitch had the whole media apparatus on her side, was funded to the point of having infinity money, and none of that was enough to even make a dent to her reputation as an absolute toxic monster. I'm a (D) on paper and when it came to the primaries I had somehow accidentally penciled in Killary and actually vomited on the ballot when I realized. Her defeat was so thorough that the non totally coping media pundits called it for Trump before sundown.

 

[dustbuster]

I'm a (D) on paper

Which do you support most:

1. political show trials
2. censorship
3. systemic racism against 68% of the population
4. energy poverty
5. mengele-esque, state-mandated mutilation of children's genitals
6. Gay Conversion Therapy against kindergarteners (not gay to straight, straight to trans)
7. workplace safety for criminals
8. World War 3
9. third world invasion
10. erasure of centuries of national monuments because "huwyte"

Anyone still a (D) on paper is certifiably 5150 or anti-human.

media pundits called it for Trump before sundown.

Believe it or not, that is so "normal" that florida's week of counting in 2000 was treated as illegitimate by 70% of Americans.
Democrats, of course, have normalized this.

 

[The Last Stand]

The Hillary campaign is going to go down as one of history's greatest blunders. Bitch had the whole media apparatus on her side, was funded to the point of having infinity money, and none of that was enough to even make a dent to her reputation as an absolute toxic monster. I'm a (D) on paper and when it came to the primaries I had somehow accidentally penciled in Killary and actually vomited on the ballot when I realized. Her defeat was so thorough that the non totally coping media pundits called it for Trump before sundown.

She's still relevant enough to invest in some spectacular old lady attire.

 

[Myles the Potatophile]

She's still relevant enough to invest in some spectacular old lady attire.

You will never bust a nut inside Hillarys dry, ashy, crusty ballot box. That's the real tragedy of her campaign. Give it up man, leave her behind like she did Bengazhi and find another geriatric white lady who will appreciate you.

 

[Betonhaus]

The Hillary campaign is going to go down as one of history's greatest blunders. Bitch had the whole media apparatus on her side, was funded to the point of having infinity money, and none of that was enough to even make a dent to her reputation as an absolute toxic monster. I'm a (D) on paper and when it came to the primaries I had somehow accidentally penciled in Killary and actually vomited on the ballot when I realized. Her defeat was so thorough that the non totally coping media pundits called it for Trump before sundown.

i think the fact that they had even tried to force Hillary as president was a clear sign that the Democrats were at the end of their rope and would never be a good party to vote for ever again.

Maybe it would be worth it to kickstart a campaign to vote for any of the third parties?
Hypothetically, if enough third party candidates win seats so that neither party has a majority, what happens? what happens if the difference between the two parties is smaller then the number of third party seats?

 

[tehpope]

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/jack-smith-urges-supreme-court-reject-trumps-presidential-immunity-claim-final-filing

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/jack-smith-urges-supreme-court-to-reject-trumps-presidential-immunity-claim-5624866

Special counsel Jack Smith in his final filing before the hearing is urging the Supreme Court to reject former President Donald Trump’s presidential immunity claim and deny any motions to delay a trial on charges related to the 2020 federal election conspiracy case.

Prosecutors from the DOJ allege President Trump attempted to overturn the 2020 election result on Jan. 6, 2021, charging him with four counts of conspiracy and obstruction.

Former President Trump has denied he did anything wrong by calling for transparency and audits of the vote counts in swing states, and maintains presidential immunity for his actions on that day, which prevents prosecution for any actions he took while still in the top job.

In a fresh court brief on April 8, Mr. Smith pressed that President Trump’s argument for presidential immunity over official acts as president has no grounding in the Constitution, the nation’s history, or Americans’ understanding that presidents are not above the law.

“The President’s constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed does not entail a general right to violate them,” Mr. Smith said in the brief.
“The Framers never endorsed criminal immunity for a former President, and all Presidents from the Founding to the modern era have known that after leaving office they faced potential criminal liability for official acts.”

According to Mr. Smith, former President Richard Nixon’s official conduct revealed during the Watergate scandal is the closest historical precedent for this situation.

Mr. Smith says President Nixon eventually accepted a pardon from his successor, former President Gerald Ford, and that “his acceptance of a pardon implied his and President Ford’s recognition that a former President was subject to prosecution.”

“Since Watergate, the Department of Justice has held the view that a former President may face criminal prosecution, and Independent and Special Counsels have operated from that same understanding,” he said.

Mr. Smith claims that despite President Trump’s claim of presidential immunity, all former presidents knew and wholly understood they were open to facing criminal charges for conduct while in the White House.

“The effective functioning of the presidency does not require that a former president be immune from accountability for these alleged violations of federal criminal law,” he said.
“To the contrary, a bedrock principle of our constitutional order is that no person is above the law, including the president.”

Trump Brief Argues Presidents Need Immunity to Function Effectively​

Former President Trump has continued to argue that official acts by presidents should have immunity from criminal prosecution. Last month, he asked the Supreme Court to hold that he and other former presidents enjoy absolute criminal immunity from prosecution for official acts during their time in office.

According to him, from 1789 to 2023, no former or sitting president has faced criminal charges for their official acts, and for good reason.

“The President cannot function, and the Presidency itself cannot retain its vital independence if the President faces criminal prosecution for official acts once he leaves office,” President Trump’s brief to the Court says.
“The threat of future prosecution and imprisonment would become a political cudgel to influence the most sensitive and controversial Presidential decisions, taking away the strength, authority, and decisiveness of the Presidency.”

The attorneys general from 18 Republican states have submitted an amicus brief in support of President Trump’s argument, saying Mr. Smith’s legal efforts against the presumed GOP 2024 presidential nominee is partisan in nature.

“Prosecutors purport to represent the People, but their approach toward President Trump suggests ulterior motives. The Court should take seriously the risk that exposing former Presidents to criminal liability will enable partisan abuse,” they wrote.

Attorneys for President Trump on March 19 argued that presidential immunity is necessary in the context of criminal prosecution to prevent cycles of recrimination and even political “blackmail” of sitting presidents.

The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on April 25. It will examine what presidential immunity covers and how it should affect the nation’s separation of powers in future administrations.

...

The outcome for the case could impact President Trump’s other legal battles, in which he also argues presidential immunity as a defense.

 

[Damocles_Sword]

Which do you support most:

1. political show trials
2. censorship
3. systemic racism against 68% of the population
4. energy poverty
5. mengele-esque, state-mandated mutilation of children's genitals
6. Gay Conversion Therapy against kindergarteners (not gay to straight, straight to trans)
7. workplace safety for criminals
8. World War 3
9. third world invasion
10. erasure of centuries of national monuments because "huwyte"

Anyone still a (D) on paper is certifiably 5150 or anti-human.


Believe it or not, that is so "normal" that florida's week of counting in 2000 was treated as illegitimate by 70% of Americans.
Democrats, of course, have normalized this.

First, none of the above. I'm fucking skinwalking at this point. I've learned to pull a jew and am trying to shift the window back right. It isn't as if most (((R))) s have many different beliefs beyond going the speed limit anyway.

As for the second, yeah, I remember the florida madness. Dems i know are still butthurt about it. I gain a bit of entertainment from watching their cognitive dissonance on f-curves.

 

[dustbuster]

I've learned to pull a jew and am trying to shift the window back right

I wish you luck.
Tulsi gabbard was a DNC leader and sitting congresswoman, and the response to calls for sanity was the annihilation of her political career.
And yeah, as someone who voted anti-dubya in 2008 I'm ready for Pinochet.

 

[GamerGateSurvivor]

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/jack-smith-urges-supreme-court-reject-trumps-presidential-immunity-claim-final-filing https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/jack-smith-urges-supreme-court-to-reject-trumps-presidential-immunity-claim-5624866

If they're going to argue against presidential immunity, I want to see Dubya and Obitchmade on trial for all the children they killed as a result of their war crimes.