Culture The Bull Pit - Pitbull News Megathread - aka sperginity speds out agendaposting

https://www.cheknews.ca/pit-bull-attack-near-nanaimo-injures-two-children-and-one-woman-450395/

https://archive.ph/8jiC9

Two 8-month-old pit bulls that were loose in Nanaimo attacked several children, severely injuring at least one. Other people that came to aid the children were also injured.

The children were playing in a yard at the house of one of their friends. The dogs were from somewhere else in the neighborhood and had been cited for being at large previously.

One of the owners of the dogs came and got the dogs but did not stick around. The news interviewed the other owner, a Dangerhair that looked to be in her late 40s or early 50s. While she was devastated at what her dogs had done, she said to the reporter, "People are saying, look at this from the prospective of a parent, well, these dogs are my kids, too," and then she broke down crying.

It was later reported both dogs were euthanized, as there have been other incidents prior to this one, and due to the severity of the injuries the one particular child sustained.

To the dangerhair dog owner I would have to say, "If these dogs were your KIDS, you did a lousy job of raising them. Thank heavens you didn't spawn any of your own."

 

[pot of sneed]

*snip*

About a decade or so ago, I used to read up about pitbull attacks because of how frequently (and horrifically) they happened. There's dogsbite.org but there was another one and I distinctly recall a big post connecting a lot of things from around that time, when dog fighting was (officially) banned and dog fighters now had all these horrible dogs on their hands. There is definitely a cult that's been hard at work behind the scenes since about the 70's, pushing these foul mutts into public hands and as predicted, many people can't handle nor even begin to comprehend the sheer explosive violence pitbulls are capable of. They were correctly defined as the 'liars of the dog world', and fighters bred them to hide signs of an imminent attack so they would have a better chance of securing the first grip against another dog. They were known as grippers and became immensely popular fighters because of it compared to just about every other breed that would just bite and let go.

Pit bulls do not. Even when their opponent is shrieking for mercy, pit bulls only wag their tails harder. It's what they've been bred to do and as pack animals, they are just as inclined to direct their violence against human beings as they are against their fellow canines. They're essentially psychopaths that have been hardcore bred for it, how 'game' pit bulls are still the most sought after of their kind despite dog fighting effectively being banned.

I also remember reading something about pitbulls and parolees, how the woman was a big name and influencer in promoting a positive image of pit bulls to the public. Make no mistake, there is very real effort by some seriously sick people to get these animals into unsuspecting homes and have them believe 'Princess' is just as sweet and friendly as any golden retriever despite the fact that the's first breed Princess will try to brutally kill. Guide dogs can't no chance against pit bulls going on an attack, nor do babies and toddlers. Even grown men struggle to fend off a gripper whose KILL button has been pressed and there's no way to turn it off until the target is dead or the pitbull is dead. The only dogs that stand a chance against pit bulls are the huge and powerful livestock guardians like Kangals who are left alone to deal with wolf packs and yet there is big money in flooding society out with these killers.

It's no mistake that pit bulls notoriously have huge litters, a feature since so many were culled over hundreds of years to make the perfect killing machine and now they're on every American street, a ticking time bomb just waiting to go off. Only truly evil people could have dreamed up such a horrific situation let alone designed it to happen.

 

[AnOminous]

There is definitely a cult that's been hard at work behind the scenes since about the 70's, pushing these foul mutts into public hands and as predicted, many people can't handle nor even begin to comprehend the sheer explosive violence pitbulls are capable of.

There's LITERALLY a cult pushing pit bulls. It's called the Best Friends Animal Society and it's a direct descendant of the notorious Process Church of the Final Judgment, often associated with Charles Manson's killings as he was inspired by the group. This pit bull fetishization doesn't come out of nowhere or just from dogfighting. Since going into much more detail would make me sound like an absolute fucking crazy just try Googling some stuff starting from there. You may be amazed.

 

[The Foxtrot]

There's LITERALLY a cult pushing pit bulls. It's called the Best Friends Animal Society and it's a direct descendant of the notorious Process Church of the Final Judgment, often associated with Charles Manson's killings as he was inspired by the group. This pit bull fetishization doesn't come out of nowhere or just from dogfighting. Since going into much more detail would make me sound like an absolute fucking crazy just try Googling some stuff starting from there. You may be amazed.

No no, please, do go on. I am too damn curious now to hear this out.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

It's called the Best Friends Animal Society

These guys?

 

[AnOminous]

These guys?

Yes. And even Google and other such entities will still report back that they're completely okay.

Despite the fact even Wikipedo notes their connections back to a genuinely horrifying cult.

Best Friends Animal Society - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

(two years old archive)

The cultists heavily monitor the article, but haven't been able to remove the connection to Process Church of the Final Judgment.

 

[question2242]

No just shoot or sterilize them, no need for unnecessary torture and bloodshed. I don't have such violent hatred for them, I just want them to go extinct.

Well said, this person is just a sadist

 

[namvata]

Well said, this person is just a sadist

I'm very good at spotting sadists because I'm an avid hunter, I am by no means adverse to killing animals but I have NEVER subjected them to unnecessary cruelty or torture in doing so. I always make sure that the animal dies a quick and painless death, and if I somehow fuck up I still do my best to correct the problem so as to not prolong it's suffering.

As I said, it's not even that I have some emotional aversion to the death of an animal, I just don't want to torture it and even if I hate the animal (ex: shitbulls) I'm still very utilitarian in how I want it to be disposed of. I've killed many pests with an air gun and didn't feel much, but I'm not so full of bloodlust that I want to see it suffer before it dies because it's just an animal, it's just going by instinct and doesn't know any better.

 

[fatcock burgerking]

Best Friends Animal Society

Surreal, I only know them from their frequent Skechers collaborations(all animal print BOBS are sponsored by bfas, or they were through 2019). Thanks for the weird rabbit hole!

 

[gagabobo1997]

If you live in an area with close neighbors or children, you should need a license/training to own pitbulls. They are quite literally bred to kill and if you don't need those qualities in a dog you should get a different breed. Owning shitbulls should be handled in the same way but to a lesser extent to owning dangerous exotic animals. Expensive and with alot of red tape to prevent your average niggers from doing it, but allowing those who want to to be able to safely.
I wouldn't be opposed to banning them outright either, other than maybe for extremely rural communities.

EDIT: also pitbull owners should be required to carry a gun so they can put down the dog at any moment in an emergency, and should legally be required to do so.

 

[Calandrino]

They are quite literally bred to kill and if you don't need those qualities in a dog you should get a different breed.

You don't need a dog that maims and kills without warning for anything other than dog fighting, which nobody should do anyway.

 

[gagabobo1997]

You don't need a dog that maims and kills without warning for anything other than dog fighting, which nobody should do anyway.

That's true. I don't think anyone needs to own tigers or lions either but eccentric rich people seem to want to. For the sake of preservation I feel like some people should own shitbulls, but they should only be licensed owners, possibly only scientists and zookeepers.

 

[Twinkie]

If you live in an area with close neighbors or children, you should need a license/training to own pitbulls. They are quite literally bred to kill and if you don't need those qualities in a dog you should get a different breed.

The problem is that it's practically impossible to enforce things like this so what's the point, unless the penalty for non-compliance would be to immediately and permanently remove the animal form the owner's possession, which won't happen.

If you live in an area with close neighbors or children, you should need a license/training to own pitbulls. They are quite literally bred to kill and if you don't need those qualities in a dog you should get a different breed.
I wouldn't be opposed to banning them outright either, other than maybe for extremely rural communities.

They don't belong in rural areas either. They just run loose and kill livestock and attack horses and other dogs. They're fucking useless except for the very niche purpose of hog baiting or whatever it's called and from what I understand they're not even great at that, there are better types of dogs to use.

Anyway I like the idea of breed bans but pitfags have lobbied for legislation banning breed bans. I don't think breed bans will ever take off in the US because a) muh freedumz and b) das raycis. Most places that had breed bans in place are repealing them.

I think there need to be much, much harsher criminal penalties for dog attacks. I read about a case that happened back in the 90s I think where a pair of Cane Corso or similar monster breed attacked and killed a woman. The owners were convicted of 2nd-degree murder. I wouldn't expect such a based indictment to happen very often but you should at least get charged with like manslaughter if your dog kills a person. I legit don't get why there aren't much harsher punishments for failing to control and contain your dangerous animal resulting in death of an innocent person.

 

[Twinkie]

That's true. I don't think anyone needs to own tigers or lions either but eccentric rich people seem to want to. For the sake of preservation I feel like some people should own shitbulls, but they should only be licensed owners, possibly only scientists and zookeepers.

They're fucking dogs, they're all the same species Canis lupus familiaris. There is no reason to preserve an obsolete shithouse breed, why? Tons of dog breeds have been phased out throughout history. And needless to say nothing of value would be lost. i don't like this mentality because it's basically the same as "it's racist to ban/euth them, they are heccin valid they have a right to exist." Dog breeds aren't comparable to an incredible an unique species like a tiger. Dogs will never, ever, be an endangered species.

 

[DoesNotLinkToYou]

That's true. I don't think anyone needs to own tigers or lions either but eccentric rich people seem to want to. For the sake of preservation I feel like some people should own shitbulls, but they should only be licensed owners, possibly only scientists and zookeepers.

We made them, we can unmake them, nothing will be lost. Something along the lines of "I brought you into this word, and by gawd I can take you out of it!!!"

 

[Falcos_Commisar]

Kept meaning to post about this in here, but there's a series of books I have read on kindle (I like to use my kindle to read b-grade horror novels, or stuff that doesn't get physical prints) about a team who are set up to investigate and stop an organization that has sprung up that creates genetically modified animals for combat/kill missions (like wiping out cartel bases, or killing afghans in caves etc). The first book was about fairly ordinary killer baboons, but the second book was where the organization made their first genetically altered monsters: giant pit bulls.
View attachment 5843127
The book is pretty dang accurate to how pits are uncontrollable monsters with no care really for who or what they attack, as the organization struggles to train and control the dogs to the point where its easier to just unleash them on the enemy and then blow them up afterwards using implanted explosives rather than attempt to even get them back into their crates. Plus the genetic alteration and growth stuff in their food has increased the aggression even more, so they are in that attack mode 24/7.
In comparison, a later book has them using giant hyenas, which are not only fully trainable, but can even be taken into combat alongside human soldiers without suddenly going nuts and killing everything. The pits by that point are relegated to pure cannon fodder (taking the brunt of gunfire/attacks) or sold to rich warlords/drug lords across the world who basically just have them as expendable guard dogs to guard their drugs/weapons stores etc.

Ahh I do love me some schlocky monster horror books.

I'll check this series out.

Speaking of pitts in monster horror, a Brit (Luke Phillips) has a 3 book animal horror series dealing with cloned sabertooth tigers and other critters like that. In book three, Phantom Beast, a side story has a pro NFL player dogfighting (author did his research here) and the titular "Phantom Beast" sabertooth takes apart multiple pittbulls at once.

A fun read.

The writing for this series is pretty decent, there's very rarely any grammatical errors etc so its been proof read, and the genetic science and such has been researched well. The organization chose pits because of their already existing aggression, and that the breed was more easily prone to building muscle and size more than many other dog breeds could, effectively making them living muscle-tanks. Plus, its a very appealing breed to sell for money to the likes of drug lords and such due to the intimidation look, and no one would really care about all of the pit-bulls they take from shelters to get the DNA and such from. They obviously didn't think past that stage though, so the difficulty in training them and such wasn't apparent until they already had some to test with.
They do also make another dog-type mutant in another book, called Betas, which are wolf DNA crossed with a type of mastiff, and even those are less full-on aggro and more smart with their attacks and can work better in groups, as they won't turn on each other at any point.

Neat, sounds like it's worth a few bucks.

 

[a hapless toad]

I think there need to be much, much harsher criminal penalties for dog attacks. I read about a case that happened back in the 90s I think where a pair of Cane Corso or similar monster breed attacked and killed a woman. The owners were convicted of 2nd-degree murder. I wouldn't expect such a based indictment to happen very often but you should at least get charged with like manslaughter if your dog kills a person. I legit don't get why there aren't much harsher punishments for failing to control and contain your dangerous animal resulting in death of an innocent person.

This was the Diane Whipple case in San Francisco and it's so much weirder than you likely remember: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Diane_Whipple

Two married lawyers were caring for the dogs but they were supposedly owned by their adopted (as an incarcerated 38 year old adult) son, a high-ranking member of the Aryan Brotherhood serving three life sentences. The husband got an involuntary manslaughter conviction, the wife got second degree murder.

 

[Agent Abe Caprine]

Unsurprisingly, the white nigger that owned those dogs did classic white nigger things.

Against Kolber's advice, Coumbs chained the dogs in a remote corner of the farm, which caused them to become even more aggressive.

You do not chain any dog up for long periods of time.

 

[Twinkie]

Two married lawyers were caring for the dogs but they were supposedly owned by their adopted (as an incarcerated 38 year old adult) son, a high-ranking member of the Aryan Brotherhood

thanks I looked it up and just bruh
1. They were jews. That adopted the Aryan Brotherhood guy as their middle-aged son
2. She's still in prison, just denied parole and not up again until 2026.
3. She was fucking the dogs, because of course she was. (L)

 

[VargReallyDidNothingWrong]

For the sake of preservation I feel like some people should own shitbulls

for the sake of preservation of what, a man-made breed of dog?

 

[Calandrino]

For the sake of preservation I feel like some people should own shitbulls, but they should only be licensed owners, possibly only scientists and zookeepers.

It would be nice if the ethics of pit bull extinction was even a topic of concern... don't worry, we're not running out of them any time soon