US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood, The Shredder, ActualCracker and 120 others
Click to expand...
Betonhaus said:
Hopefully, but there's still a solid chance that they will spin this as police abuse and downplay the fact that he shot and hit a cop. It's warming up outside so it's almost time to get riots going before the election so at least one group will fan the flames before realizing it might backfire
Click to expand...
Kane Lives said:
If the nogs really do riot over a nigga shooting at the pigs, it'd just be exquisite cherry on top of this clownyear.
Click to expand...
Riots are unlikely to happen because of Biden being in office - the shot callers know a riot while Biden is in office would be bad for them.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, Halfnium Bomb, likeacrackado and 11 others
oh no its pipkun said:
some dude in chiraq got blown away by the police. dude shot a cop and then they shot him. as usual, Johnson is talking about an obamaesqje "my sons could've been him" shit and the news is trotting the dead guys crying mom while she wails "why they gotta shoot him so many times for a seatbelt?!!!"

vids here:

Loading…

cwbchicago.com
Click to expand...
Could have been Joe Biden's son. I mean literally, do we have Hunter's whereabouts to make sure he wasn't an accomplice?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Netizennameless, Wendell X, Slur.EXE and 4 others
AnotherPleb said:
Riots are unlikely to happen because of Biden being in office - the shot callers know a riot while Biden is in office would be bad for them.
Click to expand...
I question their control over their riot golems. I do not believe they have an off switch. Plus people have been suffering under Biden's tyranny and are much angrier then they used to be.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Florch, Halfnium Bomb, Rome's rightful successor and 8 others
Fatsuit Shinji said:
Give it a little time and all abortions will be done under " the life of the mother" exemption, irrelevant of whether pregnancy is really life-threatening or not.
Click to expand...
Health of the mother means that, if the pregnant woman is sad or anxious due to the pregnancy, then there is a medical reason to provide abortion.
That's the standard, currently, in many places.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Lunacy
Reactions: silverstacks, like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, make_it_so and 5 others
Betonhaus said:
I had a question. If hypothetically there was a constitutional amendment that States could take back rights for anything the government has proven to shirk it's duty on (such as the border, healthcare, education, medical choice, etc) would that help prevent these issues from getting this bad? or would that depend on nuances that need their own thread to discuss?
Click to expand...

There's no law you can pass to fix these things because the left has decided that "social justice" trumps the law, and do not consider themselves bound by it. The Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly that when it comes to immigration, laws aren't even real. The only solution is to expel people who hate this country from institutions.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Yamma Damma, likeacrackado, Rome's rightful successor and 7 others
pwnest injun said:
Health of the mother means that, if the pregnant woman is sad or anxious due to the pregnancy, then there is a medical reason to provide abortion.
That's the standard, currently, in many places.
Click to expand...
Evil will always seek to subvert good. There are legitimate health reasons to abort a pregnancy and there really isn't a way to definitively section them off and avoid all loopholes. I suspect that it would be legislative whack-a-mole.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Netizennameless, Rainbow Idiot, Jaimas and 5 others
pwnest injun said:
Health of the mother means that, if the pregnant woman is sad or anxious due to the pregnancy, then there is a medical reason to provide abortion.
That's the standard, currently, in many places.
Click to expand...
Yup. Safe Legal Rare was the compromise and the left violated it.

It's hard to enforce rules like that when one side's stance is "the rules shouldn't exist at all becuase the compromise was only there to shut the fucking evil christofacists up and besides any restriction on a woman's right to murder a baby if it's inconvenient to her might get in the way of her fucking and sucking her way through her fertile years, and we can't have that."

The answer, of course, is that if the left broke the compromise, then the compromise is void and if the right doesn't want abortions in their states, they should push for no abortions, and let the sluts rage about it all they want. (And yes, sluts who murder their babies AND doctors that murder babies should be arrested for murder, if it's illegal in their state.)

I used to take the "I don't have a vagina it's not my place" stance, and even then, it was a "I don't like it but the alternative is worse." Now, having seen psychotic whores on twitter bragging about murdering babies out of some kind of freakish spite against the world -- almost all of whom are leftist white women.... nope. It's murder. If a slut sluts around and gets pregnant she should be forced to carry it to term and put it up for adoption.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Daily Affirmation, Super Hans v2, Rainbow Idiot and 18 others
Gehenna said:
And its the absolute best thing to do. Abortion is one of the "Perennial Issues" the uniparty has handcrafted to be a constant winner for the respective parties and they trot it out whenever they need to nudge choices to the 'correct' opinions. Trump is going a long way towards defanging it. -most- voters, by a wide margin, support handing it to the states, And this is a situation that is one of the ones where Voter Apathy helps because as long as "Its with the states" permeates the public conscious, which the left crowing about how Trump killed Roe actually does for him, then voters largely go "Good" and it -doesn't even register- as an issue.

Then all Trump has to do is speak out against any particularly egregious ones. Also notice how he slipped in "... it's all about state rights." right in the middle there sandwiched between him lightly speaking against it. Perfect counter. All Trump's online team has to do is spam that cli everywhere for the online discussion and it will rapidly spread through the normie audience.

Also as an aside, I am in the camp of "Ban abortion entirely except in obvious excepts like rape, incest, and the life of the mother". I acknowledge though that the U.S. is not ready for such a degree of restriction and view everything around this as a good thing. Its a chance to neutralize the issue and set the heat for it down to 0 over the long run. Then the debate can restart in truth.
Click to expand...
I agree with almost everything you said....except your unrestrained optimism that the debate will restart in truth.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Yamma Damma, The Nothingness and Kane Lives
Qtinterval said:
I agree with almost everything you said....except your unrestrained optimism that the debate will restart in truth.
Click to expand...
It will.... very, very eventually. Do keep in mind that either extreme of "no abortion at all" and "Abortion up to birth" are extreme minorities. The vast majority fall somewhere in the middle. The issue has been kept a hotbed because of Roe preventing any serious discussion, this was in fact the major reason that Ruth Bader Ginsburg (who was the lawyer who won that) rather infamously despised Roe.

With Roe gone and at least one half of the major political apparatus having a strong "Let the states decide" and the current SCOTUS having ruled as they did... we have a fairly lengthy, decade at least, long period for the issue to lose its bite on the federal level. With that then lowered, individual states will be hotbeds of stronger debate that itself will settle once laws are on the books.

And once -that- settles, its almost purely driven by the general sentiment of the people.

It could take as long as Roe existed for things to simmer down to the point of productive debate, but it will happen -eventually-.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, PeacefulViewer, Yamma Damma and 10 others
Absurdist Laughter said:
I like to think the Democrat's budget for bricks and riot tools were accidentally sent to Ukraine.
Click to expand...
It's crazy to think how they did that in plain view and just got away with it. Do they ever face repercussions for any of their aggressively insane and illegal activity? They started a race war over a phony incident that spanned 300 cities in an election year intentionally to diminish chances of any fair election from happening, and will never at any level be held responsible for the massive, probably irreparable damage it caused to our society. Democracy indeed.

Betonhaus said:
The riots will happen in Democrat bughives, who will be forced to crack down on crime or implode as taxpayers leave.
Click to expand...
It'll be interesting to see if they can control rogue liberal psychos from rolling off the farm and going violently schizo. They've been trained and primed for that for nearly a decade. The psychologcal damage they've done to them globally with their bs propaganda makes that a devastating likelihood. If Trump is literally Hitler, which some major journos are saying again - fucking stupid fucking idiots! - then they will see nothing as being out of bounds, no weapons off the table. That can only lead to horror.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Yamma Damma, Molly Millions, murph and 8 others
There's been numerous leftist mass shooters, including their precious troons, during Biden's regime, so I'd say the golem has well and truly slipped the leash. As for Chicago, I hope the nogs make it burn. Fuck Chicago, fuck its businesses, and fuck every one of its residents. Illinois yearns to be free of its grip, but watching the city spill its own blood is a nice consolation prize.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Another Char Clone, Yamma Damma, Molly Millions and 8 others
Gun control is only meant to stop gun violence against tyrannical governments to keep politicians and judges safe.

I think Chicago Police should just come out and say the shooting was justified because the nig shot first. If they complain?

Strike.

Simple as.

"Oh strikes aren't legal for police" well who is gonna enforce that law? The police? The Weekend Soldiers?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Daily Affirmation, wopirish, George Lucas and 16 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back