- Joined
- Nov 10, 2021
I don't actually know how this schtick hasn't driven more people insane than it already has.
I recently subjected myself to his Sins vs Wins for Rise of Skywalker because I had about eight hours to kill and hadn't really watched many EFAPs till recently, so I decided to give it a go.
The "objective viewpoint" he and everyone on EFAP looked through was really fucking weird throughout the entire thing. Mostly because they were trying to apply this idea of Objective Critique and what it means to be a good critic to two channels that are not in any way, shape, or form critics.
Worse yet, they do it so poorly that you could probably "Objectively" do a review of that EFAP and point out all the weird shit they do. Chief among them is fail to establish that Cinemasins is (weather you find them funny or not) a comedy channel, and Cinemawins is ultimately just trying to farm views off of people by saying "Hey you know that thing you like? He's all the reasons why its awesome." which is pretty harmless.
But even going beyond that, a lot of their criticisms boiled down to how they subjectively interpreted something. There were points where it was obvious one of the channels was making a joke (again your mileage may very depending on if you find it funny or not), but every single time I swear these spergs would pause and take five minutes discussing how it should have been a criticism constructed in some particular way rather than the joke it was obviously meant to be.
To me though, the most forgivable part, was that after 10 grueling hours of this autistic review of two channels that aren't even critics, they came to the conclusion that: Cinemasins will be right on bad moves more often, and Cinemawins will be right more often on good movies.
I don't understand how these people can come off as any type of intellectual reviewer when it takes them ten hours to come to such a stupid conclusion that just about anyone could have come to, with no information on either channel, after about three videos'.
