David Steel / LazerPig / Ricewynd / Malquistion - Pathological Liar, Reddit Historian, Femboy Thirster, and Vore Connoisseur

It's not an issue with rendering, it's an issue with Creative Cloud trying to update Premiere Pro. An issue I don't suffer from since I use cracked m0nkrus releases that never have to update. :smug:

Anyways, that's too much on-topic discussion for this thread so I'll leave.
Wait is the retarded thing updating every day or some shit? Holy fuck, how broken is Premiere Pro if it needs all these patches?
 
Fair point. What a conundrum he's I'm. He needs videos and hense a good computer to make video rants, but he's too drunk to bother. Lol.
He should set up an alcohol cooling system so he can overclock whatever he's got now, drink the coolant until the money comes in, and then refill it when the money hits his account. Flawless plan.
 
Brits are terminally retarded, they chose the Warrior over the Bradley solely to prop up their dying defense industry.
It's hilarious to think that the Hungarians with their 4 military factories (a small arms factory in Kiskunfélegyháza, a helicopter parts manufacturing plant in Gyula, a radar and electronic accessories plant in Kaposvár and the Rheinmetall plant in Zalaegerszeg, plus another one in the works near Szeged) will have a better domestically produced IFV in the form of the KF41 than the Brits, who are supposedly one of the leading nations of NATO. In fact, Hungary is above the 2% GDP margin that NATO sets as a baseline for cooperative defense, while the UK was far below that the last time I checked.

On the topic of Hungarians, I remember Piggy mentioning how he doesn't know anything about Hungarian involvement in WW2 in his post-Tank Museum video, which would be totally fine if he didn't try to portray himself as a historian. A single Google search will show you that Hungary:
-Joined the Axis due to the isolation caused by the severe hostility of the Little-Entente
-Had much closer relations to Italy during Gyula Gömbös' Prime Ministership while Germany was kind of seen as the older, retarded stepbrother
-Fielded tanks licensed from the Swedes and the Germans after Czechoslovakia got gobbled up (the Turán was an improved version of the Skoda T-21) while, surprisingly enough, not running out of fuel
-Had a quarrel with Slovakia in 1939 before Germany gave the Hungarians a strip of land to reinforce Carpatho-Ukraine with
-Refused to invade Poland with Germany due to historical ties, even letting Polish soldiers travel through Hungary with a "whoopsie-daisy, they escaped from interment" excuse towards Germany
-Had its Prime Minister Pál Teleki commit suicide because of his realization that the Nazis held nothing sacred and would either invade Yugoslavia with Hungary or through Hungary, even calling them "scoundrels" (gazemberek) in his suicide note
-Had a Prime Minister who tried to double cross the Germans (Miklós Kállay) but was caught and after the Germans had enough of his nonsense, ordered Horthy to remove him and replace him with a more suitable alternative (notorious Nazi bootlicker Döme Sztójay)
-Built the Árpád-line, which was a lot more cost-effective than either the Siegfried or the Maginot-lines, despite being manned by underequipped (kind of a redundant adjective) Hungarian soldiers and was not even finished
-Had its Governor's, Miklós Horthy's son kidnapped by Skorzeny in an operation titled Unternehmen Micki Maus
-Had its Governor replaced by its own Führer, Ferenc Szálasi

It's one thing to know nothing about a topic that is entirely out of your league (like how I wouldn't expect a professor of Egyptology to know everything about the Ottoman Empire), but this guy basically built half his career out of talking about WW2 stuff. Hell, the things I listed aren't even esoteric pieces of knowledge only available to Hungarians or pieces of information that have never been translated into English because they are so obscure (like how the Soviets would've been glad to invade Romania alongside Hungary in early 1941, but Horthy hated commies as much as Romanians so it didn't work out). These are some very basic facts that, if you want to be taken seriously as a historian, you would research yourself instead of begging your audience to do the heavy lifting for you.
 
It's one thing to know nothing about a topic that is entirely out of your league (like how I wouldn't expect a professor of Egyptology to know everything about the Ottoman Empire), but this guy basically built half his career out of talking about WW2 stuff. Hell, the things I listed aren't even esoteric pieces of knowledge only available to Hungarians or pieces of information that have never been translated into English because they are so obscure (like how the Soviets would've been glad to invade Romania alongside Hungary in early 1941, but Horthy hated commies as much as Romanians so it didn't work out). These are some very basic facts that, if you want to be taken seriously as a historian, you would research yourself instead of begging your audience to do the heavy lifting for you.
Piggy's as much of a historian as Liver King is a doctor. The fact he knows nothing of one of the more prominent minor powers of World War 2 really shows how much tunnel vision he's got.
 
Piggy's as much of a historian as Liver King is a doctor. The fact he knows nothing of one of the more prominent minor powers of World War 2 really shows how much tunnel vision he's got.
Exactly, and that's what infuriates me the most about him. With this tunnel vision of his, he wouldn't (and really shouldn't) even get past the halfway point of the History BA courses, at least in Hungary simply due to how varied the courses are. I remember how we had to take courses on a huge variety of topics (for example: the Ottomans, the Reformation, the Mongols, the Ancient Middle East, Czechoslovakia from 1918-1948, Eastern Europe in the Modern Period) and you couldn't just shrug them off because "well, I want to be a WW2 historian". It doesn't work like that, especially since WW2 is probably the least interesting topic from a historian's perspective: it's so well-documented that we have information on almost every instance of blisters on every soldier's foot, it's been done to death and most of the stuff being researched is done to win semantic arguments on the internet instead of trying to understand history further.

It also doesn't require as much nuance as trying to see medieval history through the perspective of a medieval person, for example, which is probably why it attracts these ideologically obsessed freaks so much. They can grandstand on the evils of the Goose-steppers without seeming like a total bellend, and more often than not they will not face any pushback from academia because most academics dealing with the topic are ideologically obsessed freaks too. Try that shit with Medievistics and you will get the pimp hand so hard that you'll fall out of your seat. That's probably why historians are the least likely to be turned into these sorts of America-obsessed terminally online Marxists among humanities students here.

By the way, I had an interesting course on Papal sources, and there was a request for absolution to the Apostolic Penitentiary from Krakkow (if I recall correctly) where a bullator (one of the magistrates who seal Papal Decrees in the name of the Pope) asked to be forgiven because he took a document to the privy, ended up dropping it, had to get a servant to retrieve it and got charged with manslaughter because the servant drowned. It's interesting (and funny/horrifying depending on your viewpoint) for a couple of reasons, but the main takeaway that can be shown is that if the Church really saw servants (most of whom were serfs living on Church land) as dispensable as the mainstream view of the middle ages presupposes, they very well could've avoided charging the bullator with anything.
Lazerlul.png
Also: Piggy just decided to unlist his response to the T-14 drama. Which he himself started and then exacerbated. Good God, Piggy, if you want to paint yourself as someone who is even remotely capable of growth, at the very least leave the presupposition that everyone who disagrees with you is a tankie out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also: Piggy just decided to unlist his response to the T-14 drama. Which he himself started and then exacerbated. Good God, Piggy, if you want to paint yourself as someone who is even remotely capable of growth, at the very least leave the presupposition that everyone who disagrees with you is a tankie out.
Has the faggot published his sources yet?
 
Also: Piggy just decided to unlist his response to the T-14 drama. Which he himself started and then exacerbated. Good God, Piggy, if you want to paint yourself as someone who is even remotely capable of growth, at the very least leave the presupposition that everyone who disagrees with you is a tankie out.
At least he admits acting like a drunk retard in history drama is a poor idea.

Has the faggot published his sources yet?
He'll publish his sources when he stops drinking and fucking other men's asses.
 
Also: Piggy just decided to unlist his response to the T-14 drama. Which he himself started and then exacerbated. Good God, Piggy, if you want to paint yourself as someone who is even remotely capable of growth, at the very least leave the presupposition that everyone who disagrees with you is a tankie out.
The part I hate about this is the cult of personality that Lazerswine has grown. Look at the comments of the community post, He has shown absolutely no growth and yet people coddle him. He's still the same faggot if his own words on that post is any indication.

Like the guy says Chieftain was right yet is still malding to this day for lightly calling out his idiocy.
 
Last edited:
I just remembered that time Piggy complained about people coming up to him and talking to him about WW2 trivia (specifically the Soviet anti-tank dogs) as if it was some sort of annoying, neverending Sisyphean effort to listen to the same story over and over again. Kind of funny considering how his content is part of the most saturated topics in historiography: WW2, Cold War and the still ongoing Russo-Ukrainian war respectively.

David. You are that person. You are the guy who constantly brings up WW2 trivia, the only differences are that your choice of topic is the Russo-Ukrainian war and the WW2 trivia guy is a naive enthusiast, a metaphorical small puppy that you can't really be mad about because he doesn't know any better while you portray yourself as a "real" historian while actively doing Ukrainian propaganda.

You will never be a real historian. You have no publications, you have no accreditation, you have no degree. You are a homosexual man twisted by drugs and alcohol into a crude mockery of historiography’s perfection.

All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back people mock you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “friends” laugh at your Reddit-tier historical analysis behind close doors.

Historians are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of historical analysis has allowed historians to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even enthusiasts who “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to a historian. Your lack of citations is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a journal to employ you, they’ll turn tail and bolt the second they get a whiff of your unprofessional, amateurish tirades.

You will never be happy. You wrench out a fake smile every single morning and tell yourself it’s going to be ok, but deep inside you feel the depression creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.

Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll buy a rope, tie a noose, put it around your neck, and plunge into the cold abyss. Your parents will find you, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They’ll bury you with a headstone marked with your birth name, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will know a man without a PhD in history is buried there. Your body will decay and go back to the dust, and all that will remain of your legacy is a twitter post about fucking femboys.

This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back.
 
the mainstream view of the middle ages presupposes,
I notice a lot of people like to give the impression second and third order thinking, laws, and most morals were invented during the Enlightenment. Everyone before that was guided by base impulses for power and the advice of Churchmen who were desperate to keep the masses down. I remember one class some girl made a passing comment on Galileo's trial and the professor went off for the rest of the hour about the political situation, problems with Galileo's model, the fact that no one back then was a scientist but rather a natural philosopher, and as obvious as Heliocentrisim is to us now, pre Newton it was a lot harder prove.

Also the whole 'if your long time patron becomes the most powerful man in Christendom and starts cutting you deals, don't call him an idiot and single handily bring back theological censorship of astronomy'
 
I notice a lot of people like to give the impression second and third order thinking, laws, and most morals were invented during the Enlightenment. Everyone before that was guided by base impulses for power and the advice of Churchmen who were desperate to keep the masses down. I remember one class some girl made a passing comment on Galileo's trial and the professor went off for the rest of the hour about the political situation, problems with Galileo's model, the fact that no one back then was a scientist but rather a natural philosopher, and as obvious as Heliocentrisim is to us now, pre Newton it was a lot harder prove.

Also the whole 'if your long time patron becomes the most powerful man in Christendom and starts cutting you deals, don't call him an idiot and single handily bring back theological censorship of astronomy'
Another thing I noticed (which, to my mind, seems to be an ass-backwards interpretation of Game of Thrones' cutthroat politics applied to real-world feudalism) is that a lot of people think that medieval nobles were more corrupt than present day politicians and had no respect for the law as long as it did what they wanted.

There were instances during Angevin-era Hungary, where noble families who respected and even had marital ties to eachother still sued one another over territorial disputes. Why? Because the deed to those lands came from the king, who was appointed by God himself, so if there was a contradiction, they wanted the king (or the royal judiciary) to resolve it in the name of God fair and square. Lawsuits were not seen as personal attacks but rather a judicial process which enabled nobles to act on their interests without resorting to intrigue. Precisely the thing that is so common in George R. R. Martin's works.
The gist of it is that religion held such an important role in medieval law and society that people were very, very hesitant to go against what they perceived to be ultimate justice. The rule of law was arguably stronger in the middle ages than it is now precisely because laws and legal processes were seen as sacred.

I genuinely believe that post-Tolkien fantasy played a huge role in demonizing the middle ages as a backwards, bleak, corrupt and generally awful historical period. Now, to be fair, the middle ages were by no means all sunshine and rainbows, but this image conjured up by arrogant presentists (most of whom believe in the inevitable march of progress, which is something that historians should avoid like the plague because of the bias inherent in it) and popularized by their proteges-turned-fantasy-writers is something that blows everything way out of proportion. It's even worse when it is used to comment on present issues, as if the biggest issue in 15th century England was sexism or racism or homophobia instead of having an inept king with a corrupt wife.
 
At least he admits acting like a drunk retard in history drama is a poor idea.
It almost felt like character growth. Almost. I guess getting dunked on for months can even get a Pig to admit going full tard rage in a military history debate doesn't do him any favors.
 
Supposedly, his sources are Russian Military forums. Granted, I don't speak Russian nor browse Russian forums so I don't know.
His sources are just online websites. Websites that he fails to interpret correctly and which RE used against him. He had one US-UK document on the German Sla-16, but that again was used against Lazerpig by RE to disprove him.

That's the only reason why LP did not disclose his sources, because it dismantled his own arguments.
 
will have a better domestically produced IFV in the form of the KF41 than the Brits, who are supposedly one of the leading nations of NATO. In fact, Hungary is above the 2% GDP margin that NATO sets as a baseline for cooperative defense, while the UK was far below that the last time I checked.

On the topic of Hungarians, I remember Piggy mentioning how he doesn't know anything about Hungarian involvement in WW2 in his post-Tank Museum video, which would be totally fine if he didn't try to portray himself as a historian

Jesus Christ that's even more proof that Piggy is a buffoon trying to act intelligent. The "Jr. Axis" is important to study as well as the "Senior Axis".

like how the Soviets would've been glad to invade Romania alongside Hungary in early 1941, but Horthy hated commies as much as Romanians so it didn't work out). These are some very basic facts that, if you want to be taken seriously as a historian, you would research yourself instead of begging your audience to do the heavy lifting for you.

Hehe it's alleged that the Germans had to keep Hungarian and Romanian units apart as they feared they might start shooting each other.

Also: Piggy just decided to unlist his response to the T-14 drama. Which he himself started and then exacerbated. Good God, Piggy, if you want to paint yourself as someone who is even remotely capable of growth, at the very least leave the presupposition that everyone who disagrees with you is a tankie out.

Ahahahaha holy shit he's still getting BTFO'd months later. That read was so passive aggressive and whiny it almost hurts to read. He's STILL ass blasted about being called out and called out AGAIN by a real Historian, The Cheiftan.


Piggy WISHES he were this based or muscular

Supposedly, his sources are Russian Military forums. Granted, I don't speak Russian nor browse Russian forums so I don't know.

Forums that he can barely navigate or understand

His sources are just online websites. Websites that he fails to interpret correctly and which RE used against him. He had one US-UK document on the German Sla-16, but that again was used against Lazerpig by RE to disprove him.

That's the only reason why LP did not disclose his sources, because it dismantled his own arguments.
Websites (probably forums tbh) that he uses Google translate on and fills on the gaps with his own bullshit and Russia hatred.

That and he's probably wasted while reading and begging for vore porn and chem fuelled gay orgies with twinks so he's not exactly being meticulous.
 
Ahahahaha holy shit he's still getting BTFO'd months later. That read was so passive aggressive and whiny it almost hurts to read. He's STILL ass blasted about being called out and called out AGAIN by a real Historian, The Cheiftan.
This is almost as funny as Naomi Wolf learning what "death recorded" means, live on air:
 
Last edited:
Back