Opinion How I navigated through religious trauma

Link (Archive)
How I navigated through religious trauma
AD267624-C967-4D4D-8C44-6192709E3247.jpeg
I was listening to NPR, watching my kids swim in the bay, their shining heads bobbing in the light-studded water when I heard the news about the tragic death of Nex Benedict. I felt grief and a sadly familiar hand of fear pressing down on my chest.

I searched the Internet to see if it related to religion, and it did, but not in the way I expected.

I feared that, like me and most queer people I know, Nex was raised in a religious home and made to feel shame about who they were. What I found instead was, in the wake of their death, the state’s anti-trans and anti-queer legislation was under scrutiny, and among the laws targeting queer kids is one that prohibits discrimination against religious organizations that adopt and enact anti-queer policies.

It’s like the seven degrees of separation game. Still, with religion — where you find one of us dead, you won’t have to look far to find a connection to religion. Specifically, a religion that finds something unnatural and wrong about perfectly natural things. However, these organizations have claimed the right to define morality for all of us. And they want the law to protect them in that claim.

This idea that an organization is being mistreated if it is asked not to discriminate against people is near the heart of a phenomenon known as religious trauma. The term was coined in 2011 when a psychologist, Marlene Winell, used it to describe what happens to people who are raised in religious environments that cause them to feel shame about who they are.

Queer kids in religious environments kill themselves at a rate four times that of their straight siblings in the same environment. Similarly, one in three adults in the United States live with the effects of some form of religious trauma.

I was raised Presbyterian and went to church every Sunday with my family. I preferred my brother’s hand-me-down clothes to my sister’s, and I liked to keep my hair short. Like the boys, I also enjoyed riding my bike shirtless in the summer. The warm summer air and the sun’s kiss on my skin didn’t seem like gifts I should be denied because I was what the world called “female.”

I was mistaken for a boy often, even in church, and I realized that I enjoyed it when people saw me that way. Trying on the skin of a boy, it fit better. In it, I could be unabashed about my feelings for girls. Such feelings were normal and expected of all boys. But as I grew into my woman’s body, I couldn’t disguise myself in the same way anymore, and the embarrassed feeling returned.

When I realized I was gay, I was about seventeen. I told my pastor. At the time, I was a deacon in the church, and the Presbyterian Church had recently adopted a law stating that no gay or lesbian person could hold office in a church. I asked him about this. He responded, “Personally, I would never ask anybody, and you don’t have to tell me.” During that time, Clinton was president and had enacted the controversial “Don’t ask, Don’t tell” policy for military personnel. This was the best my pastor could do, even after being in the room where I was born, seeing me come of age, and claiming to know and love me like a father. It wasn’t enough. Not for me. I left the church.

A few years passed when I didn’t have a spiritual path, and I missed it, but I also knew that Christianity wasn’t for me. Fathers and sons could relate, maybe, but I didn’t fit into either of those categories. Nor did I fit neatly into the role assigned to women. The missing of a spiritual path propelled me to start my tour of world religions. I read about every religion I could find, attended a service for it, and found that each was the same story with different characters. Or the same characters but with different names.

Buddhism was the religion I enjoyed the most and felt the most unique about. But even there, the Buddha was a man, and the doctrine shared the same fatal flaw as all other religions: the objective line it draws between right and wrong. How does it impose what is right and what is wrong onto me versus allowing me to decide for myself through experience? And how does each dictate precisely what form my connection to the beyond should take?

Although the one conversation that alienated me from my childhood religion and church is all I vividly remember, I know there were many other words, expressions, body language, conduction, radiation, and sheer osmosis that caused the shame to leach its way into my thinking apparatus, infecting the roots of my thoughts with false truths. As though I’d been hypnotized. As though the message that my queer self is inherently wrong had been playing on a transistor radio implanted in the back of my head, volume low, since birth. So much so that the sustained effort required to override and reframe such thinking always leaves me mildly anxious and exhausted. When I was 21, for example, a girlfriend told me she didn’t believe in Jesus Christ and thought he probably never even existed. I felt afraid for her soul at that moment because not only was she going to burn in hell for being gay, but for denying the existence of God.

Two years later, I found a spiritual path in recovery that was grounded in tangible things like my biological system and its ability to heal, given time and proper conditions autonomously. It was like the back of a single leaf with its network of veins, perfect symmetry, and tremendous beauty. Multiply that by billions and look up at a light-pollution-free night sky; there you will have it: my final religion.

Decades later, I was snorkeling, slipping weightless through spaces not native to me, feeling the impossible history there, the density when hydrogen doubles its binding to oxygen, lubricating my passage in this deadly place, this cathedral of filtered, fluid light, and I thought of how this splendor layered with lethal points to the truth of it all. The light gets its magic from the dark. In contrast, the totality of this relative place jumbled together, making patterns. Or when hiking, the sunlight filtered through the trees, breaks apart, and dances like so many fairies the same way it does across the choral and the ocean floor.

These vivid moments in nature is my church — they touch upon origins. My own earliest memories swim together in a bright place.

I am a mother now, and my co-parents are also queer, and we raise our children secularly. Some stubborn stuck childhood wound in me still believes I shouldn’t, that I wronged them by not baptizing and giving them a religion. But then I’m reminded about the healing light of truth, the brightness and softness, and the feeling of reaching out from within a place of containment.

I want their religion to be that way. One that inspires a sense of magic, wonder, and awe. It leaves them feeling, if only fleetingly and in moments, impossibly safe and unconditionally held in perfect acceptance as by water.
 
Buddhism was the religion I enjoyed the most and felt the most unique about. But even there, the Buddha was a man, and the doctrine shared the same fatal flaw as all other religions: the objective line it draws between right and wrong.
Woman can’t stand even the softest of No’s.
News at 11.
 
same fatal flaw as all other religions: the objective line it draws between right and wrong.
The very idea that "religious trauma" is caused by OBJECTIVE beliefs about right and wrong proves that all these people crying about it just couldn't handle being told that something they wanted to do is morally wrong.

They can't have any objective standards, because then there might actually be a situation where the problem is with them and not something they can blame on someone else. They want everything to be situational based on sophistic moving goal posts so that they can always be right and someone else can be blamed for being "anti" against them in some way.
Religious trauma is tough.
One time I was running and tore my catholicism.
I wish I could tear some Catholicism, but that's a different sophistic situation.
Truama, such as "church on sunday" and "youth group in junior high every Wednesday"
EXACTLY!

Every time I hear someone whining about "religious trauma" I ask what specifically happened to them. Very often they desperately try to dodge answering this question and instead vaguely gesture at some overblown publicly known example like Catholic priests covering up abuse or "quiverfull" drama.

But that didn't happen to them personally. If pressed hard enough to say what happened to them personally, it boils down to their parents were "mean" by making them go to church where they underwent the awful experience of watching veggie tales. The horror!
Translation: I immediately searched to see if and how this tragedy could be spun to validate my viewpoints and prejudices. It wasn’t easy but here’s an essay about ME
Yes, exactly. Because nothing at all actually happened to them, they have to attach themselves to supposed events that allegedly happened to other people.

It's literally nothing more than being an edgy teenager, but refusing to ever grow out of it and instead spending the rest of your life doubling down on it harder and harder every time someone tells you to knock it off.

Because if you can't blame the evil bible belt fundies for taking away your lesbian abortions, then you might have to do something unpleasant like actually taking responsibility for your own actions.
 
Wasn't 'Don't ask don't tell' meant to protect gays and lesbians from being booted out of the military? If they couldn't ask you prying questions and you couldn't tell them you were gay, you couldn't be discharged for it. Especially when there were still laws in the military where being openly gay/ lesbian could get you kicked out.

Yet some people thought this DADT was 'discrimination.'

And many religions have good/ evil concepts, it's nothing new. Is she looking for one that will give her asspats for being 'queer' and that she can do anything she wants with no eternal repercussions? Because that sounds like what she's looking for.
 
How does it impose what is right and what is wrong onto me versus allowing me to decide for myself through experience?
Because some things are inherently wrong and your "experience" is irrelevant. I'm not certain what stuff this person decided via their personal experience is morally justified but it's the language I'd expect from a child molester. "It feels right."
 
Wasn't 'Don't ask don't tell' meant to protect gays and lesbians from being booted out of the military? If they couldn't ask you prying questions and you couldn't tell them you were gay, you couldn't be discharged for it. Especially when there were still laws in the military where being openly gay/ lesbian could get you kicked out.

Yet some people thought this DADT was 'discrimination.'
Oh sweet newfag summer child who probably wasn't even fucking alive when DADT was being negotiated/put into effect.

DADT was a piece of shit "compromise" that did NOTHING to help gay servicemen and only AMPED UP discrimination, due to it being a shit sandwich of the highest order that made everything WORSE:

1. It fucked over gay servicemen who came out during the nebulous period between Clinton getting elected (partly by saying he'd let gay servicemen be openly gay) and him stabbing the gay military community in the back by saying he was backpeddling/pushing for DADT since they were now "out" and gave the greenlight for them being kicked out of the community

2. It formalized and made it legal for anti-gay elements within the military to hold witch hunts to find and kick out gay servicemen who were in the closet.

3. It also gave corrupt elements in the military the perfect excuse plot to kick out anyone they didn't like from the military: so and so fucked your girlfriend or made fun of you or stole your promotion or saw you do something against the rules? Accuse them of being a faggot and you can get them kicked out of the military!

4. It also decimated any sort of underground gay community within the military since you couldn't trust anyone after DADT. Besides fear that if one gay guy got busted/kicked out, everyone in that guy's circle of friends would be suspected of being gay, you had gays turning on each other if they had a falling out of any kind or worse, made it hard to find and befriend other potentially closeted gay military guys since one false move could get you kicked out.

Hell, the only "good" (if you can call it that) to come out of DADT was that it was such a piece of shit compromise rule that it made people want to double down on getting rid of the ban all together, because the "fix" was not a fix at all and had made things worse, to the point that any further compromise was pointless and only a blanket removal of the ban on gays in the military could fix shit.
 
She sounds genuinely insufferable:

I have been writing since age ten, starting with short stories and poems that I would read to anyone willing to listen. In elementary school, during recess, I made up stories and read them aloud, acted them out in the mirror. Before that, my imagination was unceasing. People might have thought me a recluse, but I had a multitude of friends and activities going on all the time in my private world. There has been a passion and a power in me. Even as a child, I knew that was where the writing came from.

I plan to write novels. Specifically, I plan to write literature that intricately explores some of the most unavoidable aspects of this human condition, some of which are: The artfulness of—and the relentless persistence of—the lies we tell ourselves to make everything alright; The ways we’re inherently trapped (in the body, behind sense and perception, within institutions, societies, cultures, disabilities, etc.) and our astonishingly resourceful, spiraling ways to transcend; Self-serving motivations that cause us to transgress peaceful coexistence and the consequences (both positive and negative) of these; Our complicity in situations by which we feel victimized.

My goal is to write literature that compels readers to examine their own ethical and existential questions or dilemmas, social values, and prejudices. Most importantly, I plan to write prolifically. Writing is simply my highest purpose. The passion of it and the pulling, calling power from which it comes has always been mine. I choose to answer the call.

 
Elizabeth Earley


Just before I depressed the plunger of the syringe, I looked out the skylight window that framed thin tree branches and noticed how elegant they looked against a soft gray sky. I was on my back on the floor, inseminating myself with sperm. The sperm belonged to my girlfriend’s ex-husband’s boyfriend. The combination of amused awkwardness, gratitude, and reverence I felt had become familiar by then—our fifth attempt. I closed my eyes and finished up.
By then, I was skilled at inseminating myself, both in practice and in mindset. It’s important, said the authoritative Internet articled I’d read, to have peace of mind and a sense of enjoyment, to not feel stressed or nervous. I fell into a meditative state, relaxing my body and making sure, each time, that I was feeling pleasure. Sometimes I visualized the collision of sperm and egg. Sometimes I emptied my mind and just stayed present.

It was May 2012, when they said yes to our uncommon proposal. My partner Lucy and I share custody of her four-year-old daughter with Michael and Jerel, Lucy’s ex-husband and his partner. It had been this way for two years. I had long wanted to have a child of my own. Inspired by how well our four-parent team approach worked, and how much I admired Michael and Jerel as fathers (attentive, affectionate, nurturing), I discussed the idea with Lucy of asking Jerel to father our second child. She agreed immediately. After a few months of talking and planning and deliberating, they invited us over for dinner to give us their answer.


1713047357620.png

Here is one of the polycule, Jerel Calzo:


I think this is the Michael:



For 22 years, I have served many roles in the industry of clinical research. I have led global submissions for dozens of products, including biologics license applications (BLAs), new drug applications (NDAs), investigational new drug applications (INDs), clinical trial applications (CTAs), and more. My decades of experience in pharmaceutical and biologic development have facilitated my contributions to global regulatory strategy for successful product registration and lifecycle management. This includes specialized international regulatory (FDA/EMA/PMDA/ICH) writing for pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices, especially NDAs, BLAs, and INDs and their various components, including IBs and briefing documents. I’m trained and certified on CTD/eCTD submission requirements, as well as some specialized European filings such as QRDs and CERs. I have authored libraries of standard operating procedure (SOP) documents, work practices, and process notes for small- to medium- sized biotech and pharma companies to get them inspection-ready and set their teams up for success with built-in efficiencies. My R&D work has included laboratory protocols, patent disclosures, user manuals, interpretation guides, package inserts, V&V reports, and protocols including template design. I am experienced at writing and editing for scientific and medical research. My clinical medical writing experience has also included peer-reviewed manuscripts, monographs, reports, proposals, white papers, policy documents, abstracts, posters, and feature articles.

Why are there so many lezzers doing exactly that job? Keeps coming up.

 
Back