US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Oooh! Ooh! Me first! I get to start the tard war over this!


It's not the jews or the Iranians behind this, it's the robots! They are simply using the hatred between countries to mask their true plan!

Total wizard destruction! Those cybernetic bastards! THEY'LL NEVER TAKE ME ALIVE! I'LL RIP OUT THEIR PROCESSORS WITH MY BARE TEETH BEFORE THEY CAN TOUCH ME!

I shall join my fellow wizard in this battle!
 
That meme would have got you banned from the Israel-Palestine thread in October. I'm amazed how drastically the community opinion has shifted in 6 short months.
It’s not an opinion issue; it’s an issue that this exact thing has been posted in pretty much every single page of the thread back then (and I assume now too). It’s the go to image for someone who has literally nothing to say, but wants to post for some reason
 
It’s not an opinion issue; it’s an issue that this exact thing has been posted in pretty much every single page of the thread back then (and I assume now too). It’s the go to image for someone who has literally nothing to say, but wants to post for some reason
The rule never changed. They just stopped enforcing it after Israel's support started slipping. There were a half dozen people neg rating everything remotely critical of Israel and I'm left to assume those people were reporting shit constantly because when they fucked off, the bans stopped.

Edit- and it wasn't just the meme that got you banned. "Bothsidesism" was banned, so anyone making the point that picking sides was stupid, or that this whole conflict would come back to fuck the west got jannied.
 
I can assure you that these two things are not related.
Nothing ever is. In that case it's purely coincidental that the moderation relaxed, the zionist simps fucked off, and the general consensus of the I/G conflict turned against Israel all around the same time.

My original point still stands.
 
Am I wrong in thinking that whatever establishment forces our government is has already won? Four years, four wars, 8 years of crippling the military numbers with forced vaccinations, unpatriotic rhetoric, and gender theory. 4 years of non stop illegal immigrants invading the states in preparation for census data. At this point, a Trump victory nearly sounds hollow. The administration will be tied up with those wars and a lackluster military to command, in addition to the usual songs and dances we've seen from 2014-present from the propaganda machine that is MSM. Three letter agencies openly antagonistic to the people and even there own government officials as extremists terrorize the populace; controlling the brown shirt useful idiots to do their bidding. It'll take more than 4 years to undo the damage of this administration and I'm doubtful after Trump things will get better; it's almost like they speed ran Hillary's role in the grand scheme of things. We're back on schedule lads and lasses, welcome back to the status quo.

All because an orange man rejected the invitation to play their game.
in these trying times I urge you to look into the fates of most of the Old Bolsheviks. As bad as things can get these people will never "win" at best they burn with us,.
 
In that case it's purely coincidental that the moderation relaxed,
Personally I realized I literally was wasting my time banning you all because either you all kept making socks, or you were replaced by people who all repeated word for word dime a dozen posts that the people I banned did. No amount of banning people will teach them to be literate as to the rules.
 
Personally I realized I literally was wasting my time banning you all because either you all kept making socks, or you were replaced by people who all repeated word for word dime a dozen posts that the people I banned did. No amount of banning people will teach them to be literate as to the rules.
The truth will always break free
 
The rule never changed. They just stopped enforcing it after Israel's support started slipping. There were a half dozen people neg rating everything remotely critical of Israel and I'm left to assume those people were reporting shit constantly because when they fucked off, the bans stopped.

Edit- and it wasn't just the meme that got you banned. "Bothsidesism" was banned, so anyone making the point that picking sides was stupid, or that this whole conflict would come back to fuck the west got jannied.

I believe all of DC should be deported to Gaza and serve as penal battalions for the IDF.

Also throw in televangelist faggots and the children of every mainstream news pundit as well.


Nothing ever is. In that case it's purely coincidental that the moderation relaxed, the zionist simps fucked off, and the general consensus of the I/G conflict turned against Israel all around the same time.

My original point still stands.

Zionists basically are the biggest reason for their optics fail.

A video of Bibi talking about emulating Amalek or the Israeli ambassador drawing inspiration from Dresden or Ben Shapiro being Ben Shapiro or the IDF's own videos of them bombing anything on a whim.

Did more damage then some fat brown leftist pig willing to commit murder in some city council meeting on Bakersfield, California.

Leftoids are basically pawns with no power on their own without shitlibs funding them. And both shitlibs and neocons want to commit censorship to shut down apps that don't toe the line that the media sets.
 
I noticed a shitload of media and people conveniently forgetting to mention how Israel bombed the Iranian Embassy and that is why Iran attacked them directly. The kike money is doing wonders.
I am sure Iran didn't use that Embassy to help terrorists at all.
 
I am sure Iran didn't use that Embassy to help terrorists at all.

Not the point retard. How hard was it to wait for the Iranians to leave the embassy and kill them en route to a airport? Attacking a embassy is a no-no when said embassy belongs to someone like Iran who will retaliate.

If a US embassy got bombed it would be a act of war too. As would a Israeli embassy getting attacked by Iranians.
 
"Safe, Legal, & Rare" is fine as a compromise politically, but that doesn't change the fact that abortion is the killing of an unborn child. I can acknowledge that there are situations where that is a necessary evil, but it is still an evil. Even providing exceptions is done out of a need to contend with how fucked up as a species we can be. In a perfect world they would not be necessary evils, but they are so I content with the world I live in not in the world I would prefer.

In the end, "Safe, Legal, & Rare" is a political compromise on a deeply moral issue. Only acceptable because the other side would have abortions on demand at any point.


How would it be defined? Who decides? What if two states disagree? Its nice in theory but utterly falls apart when actually considered in practical terms.



Read. Better.

Not mentioned in any debate is that limits to abortion to only rape and incest means women will cry rape/child molestation to get their baby murder fix if "just because/because I CAN kill it" is removed from the legal abortion equation.

Hell, Law and Order famously made the punchline to their Tawamna Brown episode that Not-Tawanna cried rape to get an abortion because her abusive anti-white father was a religious zealot who thought abortion was murder and her mother, rather than paying for the abortion on the sly, decided to force Not-Tawanna to fake being raped by white police officers, so her father would let her get an abortion to get rid of a biracial rape baby.
 
Not the point retard.
Yeah that is the point, everyone knows that Iran funds the people attacking Israel but when Israel decides to start doing something about it suddenly Iranians Didndu Nuthin.

Attacking a embassy is a no-no when said embassy belongs to someone like Iran who will retaliate.
Not when people are using that Embassy to set up attacks.

If a US embassy got bombed it would be a act of war too.
Not if they are doing sleezy shit like when we were probably running guns through the Embassy in Benghazi.
 
So civil war, even if its just low-level, in 18 months. Unless they plan to merely conscript shitlibs/commies.
The good news is that a draft would, as far as I'm aware, require Congress to actually invoke it via vote. I expect they'll drain the entire retiree recall and ready reserve pool, nationalize the guard and everything before congress is willing to pull that trigger, especially now that Gehanna set me straight on the kickbacks or lack thereof for those people. So we'll have plenty of forewarning, although they're already reaching into the retiree pool.

After all, they can play off a war, but a draft is going to be pretty much immediately hated by all sides because now the wars become their personal immediate problem and concern, as opposed to a conceptual and economic one occurring somewhere else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back