What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

I disagree. I do think that plenty of events over the years have been staged.

Staging is one thing, my problem with the crisis actors is when they insist two people are the same. I just can't believe the government is that cheap to keep reusing people especially in this age of recordings.

I'd sooner believe they are growing actors in a vat that they use and dispose of before reusing the same assets.
 
That quote is taken out of context and retarded flat earthers glom onto it as proof of their bullshit. What the Nasa guy was talking about is that it'd be extremely difficult to manufacture a Saturn V today not because we don't have the tech but because our tech has improved so much that Nasa would be better off designing a whole new rocket. Asking Nasa and their contractors to manufacture a Saturn V would be like asking Ford to manufacture a '69 Mustang. Ford could do that, or just make a modern Mustang that has a much better engine and modern safety features and it'd be much cheaper. Nasa hasn't designed a rocket capable of doing a lunar mission because they've been focused on low-Earth orbit since the '70s and their obsession with the fucking shuttle. America landed on the moon and if you don't believe that you're a flat earth nigger that needs to eat a fucking bullet. Everything else in your post is true, though.
I continue to think that the reason we haven't gone back is one of two options:
  1. Occam's Razer. We don't go back because despite public desire, there just isn't enough on the moon to justify going there. Maybe we could one day harvest helium or armalcolite or whatever, but why waste our time doing that currently when we don't need to? We've got shit on Earth that does the same job, it's basically just luxury goods that don't have guaranteed buyers. We can't currently set up a moon base, and even if we chose to do so within the next 10 years, why would we? What do we possibly gain from setting up and maintaining a moon base? It's all luxury/vanity projects for the time being.
  2. Hollow Moon Theory. We went to the moon, something horrific happened, and now we absolutely refuse to go back. NASA would repeat the first reason as justification, but the actual true reason is that there's something on the moon that makes us question our place in the universe. You can't let Joe Everyman know about whatever it is, there'd be immediate wars and rioting and market failures, so we say "oh we don't need anything on the moon, it's too expensive, there's no reward, we don't care," and we destroy footage and swear some people to secrecy at risk of death, and we never ever ever let anyone else in on what's going on. No new astronauts to discover the truth, no NASA employee briefings on it, so over time anyone directly exposed to the horrible information dies/retires and new people just think it's crazy conspiracy nonsense.
Personally, I think the moon is hollow, BUT I don't know if there are aliens on/in it currently. It could genuinely be a middle reason between Occam's Razer and the HMT; there's unsettling weirdness on the moon, but it's not worth it to NASA to keep investigating further.
 
Occam's Razer. We don't go back because despite public desire, there just isn't enough on the moon to justify going there.
that's why the program was cancelled to begin with. other than rocks, of which many pounds were brought back its not worth the trip, especially now that rovers and satellites have made observation so much better.
 
Hollow Moon Theory. We went to the moon, something horrific happened, and now we absolutely refuse to go back. NASA would repeat the first reason as justification, but the actual true reason is that there's something on the moon that makes us question our place in the universe. You can't let Joe Everyman know about whatever it is, there'd be immediate wars and rioting and market failures, so we say "oh we don't need anything on the moon, it's too expensive, there's no reward, we don't care," and we destroy footage and swear some people to secrecy at risk of death, and we never ever ever let anyone else in on what's going on. No new astronauts to discover the truth, no NASA employee briefings on it, so over time anyone directly exposed to the horrible information dies/retires and new people just think it's crazy conspiracy nonsense.

This is a theory I believe in as well. The moon has always seemed unnatural to me, almost as if its an observation post of sorts.

I read a theory once that was rather schizo but also made sense to me for some reason. Have you ever watched "Twin Peaks" ? The whole concept of parallel dimensions with demons literally feeding upon the suffering of humans and negative energy that is created (garmonbozia) via this suffering. I read a similar theory that the moon had "pain towers" that picked up this negative energy and stored it for consumption.
 
Gravity comes from mass, dude. An empty shell isn't going to give you much unless that shell is made of magic somehow that defies the rules of the universe.

My definition of "hollow" in this case actually considers that the moon may have an entire super-structure underneath its surface. Sort of like a space ship or space station where the surface is what we see as the moon.

It's possible that such a super structure would have enough mass to still causes tides. Who can say either way ?

There was a time when asbestos being safe was considered a "rule of the universe", bruh.
 
The Moon is so mathematically improbable it's fucking weird, according to my completely uneducated brain.
It's size, how slow it is, tidal lock, and how sketchy some NASA shit is with the Moon, these are all pretty bizarre.
BTW, we did land on the Moon, but I'm pretty sure there was some level of doctoring involved. NASA is not a very trustworthy organization, they doctor and manipulate images all the time. Couple that with the Cold War, Space Race, and politics, it's not unreasonable to think there's some punching up going on at best and downright lies at worst.
 
The Moon is so mathematically improbable it's fucking weird, according to my completely uneducated brain.
It's size, how slow it is, tidal lock, and how sketchy some NASA shit is with the Moon, these are all pretty bizarre.
BTW, we did land on the Moon, but I'm pretty sure there was some level of doctoring involved.
Yeah yeah yeah whatever, they hired Stanley Kubrick to fake it, but he was such a perfectionist he actually did it on the Moon.
 
No it wasn't. It was thought that it stopped fires. Which it did. They hadn't even considered that it did other unintended shit.

The point being that there have been plenty of things that were considered immutable facts of the universe and that's not so much the case now.

I'm going to go and enjoy other threads rather than arguing with some retard on the internet.

I think Albert Pike was right about the three World Wars.

I'm with you on this one. I really do think that we're in the End Times with all the crazy shit that you see out there.
 
Yeah yeah yeah whatever, they hired Stanley Kubrick to fake it, but he was such a perfectionist he actually did it on the Moon.
He wanted to, but he decided the moon's surface didn't look moon-like enough to the camera, so it was actually filmed on Mars. The Mars probe missions are filmed on Venus.

Venera probes were actually in Kazakhstan.
 
I'm starting to buy into the idea that we live in a controlled simulation. There's just too much weird shit going on for this to be entirely organic
Simulation theory is creationism for cowards.

Hollow Moon Theory. We went to the moon, something horrific happened, and now we absolutely refuse to go back
We went back multiple times though.
 
What the Nasa guy was talking about is that it'd be extremely difficult to manufacture a Saturn V today not because we don't have the tech

I continue to think that the reason we haven't gone back is one of two options:
It’s not just stuff like the tech, it’s people. It’s the brains and grit to do it. These guys were engineers in an age where it was incredibly hands on. Their education was suberb, and they could create custom one off machined pieces. But it’s more than that, it’s people. You watch things like ‘the right stuff’ and it’s gloriously dangerous. There were no bean counters worrying about danger (well there probably were but they were leashed enough to not stop things.) they were incredibly brave men doing brave and frankly stupidly insane stuff and they knew the odds. I don’t think we have enough people like that these days. You’ll have a few, for sure, but everyone at nasa in those days was a different breed, from the guys in the rockets to the calculators. Nowadays we don’t have enough PEOPLE who are good to sustain such an operation.
I think we went to the moon and I think there is more than is being let on maybe about why we’ve not gone back since 1972.
Simulation theory is creationism for cowards.
One thing that tickles me about simulation theory articles is the way they all have the same breathless acceptance we live in a simulation and then all abruptly stop just before the most interesting point which is that it implies the existence of a creator. It’s like they can’t quite take that final ‘you may just have proved God exists’ step no matter what. It’s always funny
 
What if the Cold War never really ended, but just morphed into the "Culture War" of Current Year, with a "ceasefire" and buildup to Clown World during the '90s and '00s?

:thinking:

In other words, what if it's always been commies versus non-commies since the mid-20th century?
Current year "commies" would not survive an actual commie society much like how neo nazis would never survive Nazi germany.
 
Back