What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

[Ebonic Tutor]

I would love to, but I'm not sure about how to post links on here without it somehow leading back to my IP or even my PC (sorry for my paranoia, it's just that I know a small army of nigger faggot trannies are out there trying to dox anyone and everyone from this site).

Why the flying fuck are you on this site then if you're that retarded and paranoid?

 

[Armor of God]

Why the flying fuck are you on this site then if you're that retarded and paranoid?

Because I can say naughty words that would get me banned anywhere else.

 

[Ebonic Tutor]

Because I can say naughty words that would get me banned anywhere else.

Congratulations we got your IP saying the same things here you are worried about leading back to you via linking to a youtube video.

You're a special type of retarded newfag.

 

[Chromeo]

Because I can say naughty words that would get me banned anywhere else.

It's okay grandpa, we're all newfags at some point. Nobody can trace your IP just because you shared a link to YouTube. Even if they could, you're not doing anything illegal.
If it worries you enough, you could always use the Tor browser or a VPN (or both!) which hide your IP from the websites you visit. They're a little slow, but they're more secure.

 

[Sailor Kim Jong Moon]

Congratulations we got your IP saying the same things here you are worried about leading back to you via linking to a youtube video.

You're a special type of retarded newfag.

Honestly, after reading some more on this I still think the shooting happened but can see why people would think it’s a hoax.

That video of Robby Parker didn’t convince me the shooting didn’t happen. It did convince me Robby Parker is a weirdo.

 

[AnOminous]

The point being that there have been plenty of things that were considered immutable facts of the universe and that's not so much the case now.

When was it ever considered an "immutable fact" that asbestos was completely harmless? They just didn't know.

Because I can say naughty words that would get me banned anywhere else.

Get a VPN dude and if that's not paranoid enough for you use tor. Posting links to stuff isn't going to be more likely to out you than just posting at all anyway.

 

[Doctor Love]

Also explains why big leaps in technology or science are invented by lots of people at the same time. He’s done studies on dogs and people coming home at unpredictable times and the dogs mostly seem to be aware of when the owner is on their way.

There's some theories which make more sense than named, theoretical planes.

There's a bunch of theoretical particles which do exist, which can transfer information across different planes. There's also the concept of evolution - it's blind, and erratic. So, "if" the theoretical particles which can transfer information outside of the known quantities - light, sound, chemosensory adaptations like smell and taste - people and animals would evolve it, blindly, if it was beneficial.

Einstein's whole schtick was that everything is relative, and that the speed of light is the point at which the travel of an object through time is zero. And, when an object is stationary, the time is 1. But if a particle exceeds the speed of light, then it should travel in the negative, to compensate. And, if certain molecules or structures were able to respond to that, then over time, evolution would produce a structure able to decipher some information from it.

In order to prove that, unfortunately we'd need to accelerate particles beyond the speed of light - and then direct them towards a particular animal to see if it reacts before the beam fires. Then keep doing it until we figure out which part of the animal causes the largest response.

He says modern society has dulled this sense in us but animals exhibit it much more acutely, like when rats come up to the surface before an earthquake or how cows can predict storms.

I know that there is some sense beyond the known ones. There's definitely another place from which you draw information which isn't one of the known senses - you can experiment with it, yourself - if you start dissecting every opinion that you have, and really check why you believe certain things, you will find that there's a huge chunk of "missing data" where you can't quite figure out where it came from.

When you have a "gut sense" about something, you can start looking into it and you'll find that a lot of these "brainworms" have good ground underneath them. Usually it's something which seems to hold more value than it should - in the same vein that your own dog is better than other dogs, random things have a certain familiarity and no discernible reason for it. This is a weird habit of mine, if you've followed my posts and wonder how the fuck I come up with some of the shit I do.

Speaking of - the UK Government is now chock-full of Islamists, particularly within the Home Office. They are planning something.

This is the real reason we won't go back. Here's a top secret film I found while hacking into the Pentagon with my Gibson:

There is a conspiracy theory about that exact movie which I believe.

Hollywood gets it marching orders from Washington, and one of them is the firm belief that violence is not the answer (unless you're the government) - so, Captain America or Batman can never be shown to ruthlessly kill an opponent. It's shown as dark, and out-of-character, for lethal violence. You cannot have the moral of the story as "extreme violence is amazing, when you do it for the right reason" - realistic, hand-to-hand combat and violence is rare, and actual brutality is rarer. A brutal protagonist is unheard of - they're always an "anti-hero" or something.

Except Michael Bay appears to have said, "yeah but they're big robots" and just thrown out that movie, wherein the protagonists literally tear their enemies limb-from-limb.

 

[Armor of God]

When was it ever considered an "immutable fact" that asbestos was completely harmless? They just didn't know.

Get a VPN dude and if that's not paranoid enough for you use tor. Posting links to stuff isn't going to be more likely to out you than just posting at all anyway.

I do use a VPN so there’s that covered I guess.

I had read in the past that posting links in a certain way could allow someone to use elements of the weblink itself to trace back to the poster in some way, so had some paranoia.

What’s the safe way to do it ?

It's okay grandpa, we're all newfags at some point. Nobody can trace your IP just because you shared a link to YouTube. Even if they could, you're not doing anything illegal.
If it worries you enough, you could always use the Tor browser or a VPN (or both!) which hide your IP from the websites you visit. They're a little slow, but they're more secure.

Thank you friend ! I do use a VPN. Just trying to learn how to post YouTube links without exposing my own YouTube account via that link…

 

[Molly White's Breast Milk]

Learn how to multi-quote you fucking retarded boomer newfag.

 

[AnOminous]

I had read in the past that posting links in a certain way could allow someone to use elements of the weblink itself to trace back to the poster in some way, so had some paranoia.

If there's weird shit in it, often after a # you should generally cut that out. Google idiotically does this with urls from search results, including the search phrase used at the end. Anything after a # is usually extraneous.

 

[Armor of God]

Learn how to multi-quote you fucking retarded boomer newfag.

Give an old timer a break, will ya ? I'm trying my best out here.

If there's weird shit in it, often after a # you should generally cut that out. Google idiotically does this with urls from search results, including the search phrase used at the end. Anything after a # is usually extraneous.

Ok thank you friend.

 

[VeteranOfTheRetardWars]

Hollywood gets it marching orders from Washington, and one of them is the firm belief that violence is not the answer (unless you're the government) - so, Captain America or Batman can never be shown to ruthlessly kill an opponent. It's shown as dark, and out-of-character, for lethal violence. You cannot have the moral of the story as "extreme violence is amazing, when you do it for the right reason" - realistic, hand-to-hand combat and violence is rare, and actual brutality is rarer. A brutal protagonist is unheard of - they're always an "anti-hero" or something.

Except Michael Bay appears to have said, "yeah but they're big robots" and just thrown out that movie, wherein the protagonists literally tear their enemies limb-from-limb.

Ok, so I have legit written papers on this.
A lot, and I mean a lot of superhero comic tropes come from this thing called the CCA. The Comics Code Authority. If you have any comics from the silver and gold eras, you can likely see their stamp on the front. Basically, you could only publish mainstream comics with that stamp.
And let me tell you, their rules were absurd. I’m on mobile now, so I implore you just look up a list of CCA rules because it explains a lot about how the stories were made and how that influences capeshit to this day.

 

[AnOminous]

Ok, so I have legit written papers on this.
A lot, and I mean a lot of superhero comic tropes come from this thing called the CCA. The Comics Code Authority. If you have any comics from the silver and gold eras, you can likely see their stamp on the front. Basically, you could only publish mainstream comics with that stamp.
And let me tell you, their rules were absurd. I’m on mobile now, so I implore you just look up a list of CCA rules because it explains a lot about how the stories were made and how that influences capeshit to this day.

Fredric Wertham is burning in Hell, not only for his made-up nonsense (Seduction of the Innocent) starting a moral panic about stuff like the awesome EC comics that were basically wiped out by the CCA, but defending child murdering serial killer Albert Fish (yeah this guy truly gave a shit about children).

And of course his thesis was that reading edgy comic books turned children into criminals. At least it didn't turn them into sex toys and corpses like his buddy Albert Fish.

How many times we've seen that very thesis from the assclowns of the universe. Oh, vidya turns you into a mass murderer. Vidya gives you soggy knees. Vidya makes you a Nazi.

Fuck that guy.

 

[VeteranOfTheRetardWars]

Fredric Wertham is burning in Hell, not only for his made-up nonsense (Seduction of the Innocent) starting a moral panic about stuff like the awesome EC comics that were basically wiped out by the CCA, but defending child murdering serial killer Albert Fish (yeah this guy truly gave a shit about children).

Shit dawg I never heard about that part.
I didn't even know there was an Albert Fish defender out there, I didn't know a single human being would be that retarded...

Well, it is a conspiracy thread after all.

 

[AnOminous]

Einstein's whole schtick was that everything is relative, and that the speed of light is the point at which the travel of an object through time is zero. And, when an object is stationary, the time is 1. But if a particle exceeds the speed of light, then it should travel in the negative, to compensate. And, if certain molecules or structures were able to respond to that, then over time, evolution would produce a structure able to decipher some information from it.

That's the tachyon. If they actually exist in special relativity, you could use them to send messages backwards in time (or even have a time machine like a Star Trek transporter to send a whole person back in time). So far as I know most physicists don't believe they're possible, and there's no experimental evidence of their existence, unlike the Higgs boson, which was recently proven actually to exist.

Also back to the Moon thing, I think it being actually hollow is ridiculous, but there could be buried bases and if the UFO aliens are watching us, they're probably doing it from small well-concealed observation facilities that are mostly buried but have cameras of some sort on the surface that can be retracted.

The Moon itself being actually hollow makes no physical sense, though. It would have to be artificially constructed in its entirety to be that and simultaneously have the observed gravity it has.

 

[Doctor Love]

I don’t think we have enough people like that these days. You’ll have a few, for sure, but everyone at nasa in those days was a different breed, from the guys in the rockets to the calculators. Nowadays we don’t have enough PEOPLE who are good to sustain such an operation.

I would, glowingly, put myself into that camp. Sorry for the triple-post, but I was going through the thread.

There is no focus on practical skills within the academic system. Practicality comes second to paperwork, memorisation and verbiage - and the term "education" has become restricted to a very specific type of "paper education" but there is an entire generation of Engineers who don't know how to use a tenon saw.

If they actually exist in special relativity, you could use them to send messages backwards in time

My point was - if they exist, evolution would produce such a result without knowing how.

 

[AnOminous]

My point was - if they exist, evolution would produce such a result without knowing how.

Maybe it has, though.

These guys were engineers in an age where it was incredibly hands on. Their education was suberb, and they could create custom one off machined pieces. But it’s more than that, it’s people.

Note, most of the astronauts who got us to the Moon were not just physical badasses, they actually did the math they needed to get there on slide rules. Not electronic calculators, not computers. Buzz Aldrin went up there with a slide rule.

 

[Doctor Love]

Note, most of the astronauts who got us to the Moon were not just physical badasses, they actually did the math they needed to get there on slide rules. Not electronic calculators, not computers. Buzz Aldrin went up there with a slide rule.

Microsoft Excel is the most powerful tool in existence, today, yet nobody uses it for its full potential.

I posted this in another thread, but since I'm here - the deindustrialisation of working-class Europe, particularly England, is a deliberate Morganthau-style plan to destroy European power.

Carbon taxes are the same deal.

There's a reason why the idea of European "stolen wealth" is fucking lunacy. The hot-air blast furnace was invented in Scotland, the railway is English and, if anything, European industrialisation is what ended slavery.

Specifically, people like Wedgwood - who is largely forgotten in contemporary media - were the men who ended slavery worldwide. Wedgwood is from what was a town called Burslem, now part of Stoke-on-Trent.

Stoke-on-Trent is fucking bizarre - the industrial revolution started in Manchester, and Stoke-on-Trent was part of that. But unlike Manchester, the ironworks meant that they couldn't easily demolish the old industrial bases.

So there are gigantic fucking obelisks scattered around the city, and like barbarians scattered around the Roman ruins, there are ruins which are so bulky that the post-industrial city built itself around them.

There is no real center to the city, and the town have hundreds of Victorian and WWI-era iron bridges which, according to the council, cost too much to do anything about - James May once got his boat-car stuck underneath one of the old bridges.

There is a derelict manor house on the outskirts of the city, there is a drug problem which nobody else on the planet has, and there are fifty unused industrial kilns which nobody is allowed to restore. Because environment.

 

[Google.com]

I think it's been mentioned already and this is a pretty popular one to believe in. So much so that Wikipedia has only recently coined it a conspiracy despite more than half of the population believing it(lowering now with younger people)

But TWA flight 800 being hit with a missile rather than it being some sort of explosion caused by faulty wiring. Reports from during not after of multiple air craft in the area seeing a light rising towards the plane and reporting it to air traffic control. Navy boats turning away from the accident in the area, and very questionable explosive residue tests. Along with missing foia requests and such.

 

[Agent Abe Caprine]

Ok, so I have legit written papers on this.
A lot, and I mean a lot of superhero comic tropes come from this thing called the CCA. The Comics Code Authority. If you have any comics from the silver and gold eras, you can likely see their stamp on the front. Basically, you could only publish mainstream comics with that stamp.
And let me tell you, their rules were absurd. I’m on mobile now, so I implore you just look up a list of CCA rules because it explains a lot about how the stories were made and how that influences capeshit to this day.

I wouldn't be surprised if the CCA was made to get rid of capeshit's competition. For a long time, the only other genre in mainstream American comics was Archie. Very odd.