Hiccup Scream
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 5, 2021
Men and women inherently, and fundamentally complement each other.
Were this as inherent and fundamental as you say such emotional and personality issues would not appear as often, and would be superseded by this complementing traits. While I agree with you that we are biologically predisposed towards the opposite sex, the environment that we are in now is so radically different from that which pushed the development of these traits and there are less or different evolutionary pressures than there have ever been before. For the most part these traits continue to benefit us but they also act as sowing grounds for insecurities when modern society caters to inversions of nature.Divorce is a result of individual emotional and personality issues
I would argue its moreso because the state has made there be economic advantages to being divorced/unmarried (in the lower class) which causes impressionable people to trend towards braking up families. No fault divorce wouldn't be a problem.The reason divorce is so common is because of the rise of no fault divorce
For most of history mankind had an incredibly high infant mortality rate, lived to halfish the modern human lifespan, and had no means to travel any great distance with guarantee of a return trip. For most of human history you really didnt have anything near the size of dating pool that exists now, and settling for better or worse has become a much less sought after concept.For much of history, love and affection were seen as of secondary importance to a relationship.
Like the backwater savages of hindu and islamic world in the modern day. I really shouldnt have to elaborate on why thats distasteful.Generally, it was expected that love in a relationship would come later. Its why arranged marriages were the norm
Nearly five centuries ago Romeo and Juliet was written, the ideal is not a new concept, the opportunity to fulfill it is.The romantic ideal of marrying for love primarily is a relatively new one.
You have a well developed opinion based on very real observations that I myself have also read into and good reason to think the way you do. Men and women do complement each other at a subcontious level and there has been a great effort to hid that fact, same goes with the depth that racial heredity imposes upon psychological predispositions. But I think the prevalence of homosexuality is closer related to a lower infant mortality rate, a higher rate of mutation, and a growing number of people with chronic/inheritable illnesses, and is compounded by the states propaganda. In the same way a sick herd animal leaves the group to die alone (most likely to hide from predators in a weakened state rather then out of empathy or understanding disease spread) I think in a society with high population saturation it is not out of this world to see those with mental sickness' whom embrace homosex committing to a comparable role, in this case leaving the genepool.