2016 US Presidential Election Thread 2 - Always Darkest before Don

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tranhuviya said:
>WND

Nigga please.
Click to expand...

It was the first thing that popped up when I googled it, I know what they were referring to but I got better shit to do lol. Just google "Hillary poop bus georgia" and a few other articles will pop up
 
Ineedahero said:
Are... Are we living in the same universe? Because in this universe the entire media apparatus is going out of its way to hold Trump accountable for everything they can find
Click to expand...
Oh no, the media is reporting what Trump said and did. We should sue them anytime they don't kiss his ass and treat him with kids gloves like in the primary election.
while both Hillary and Bill are practically untouchable despite everything they do or have ever done.
Click to expand...
Yep, the media didn't say a word during the e-mail investigation, the Benghazi probes, the impeachment of Bill, or anything negative. There are no news articles about any of the DNC emails or any of these recent emails at all.
As someone here previously said, nobody cares that Hillary called black youth amoral psychopaths
Click to expand...
A statement she walked back and apologized for, yet you seem to think Trump's core would give a shit if he dropped the pretense and outright call blacks as Googles. Don't bullshit me. Trump only tried to court the black vote for like 2 weeks in August. You're delusional if you think Trump gives any more of a shit to blacks than Clinton.
and laughed about not trusting polygraphs after successfully defending a man who raped a twelve year old into a coma. And you think Trump is getting a free pass?
Click to expand...
No, Trump's not getting a free pass. Trump is getting exactly what he deserves. But when most of the damaging things the media has done has been to simply read back what he said, he has nobody to blame but himself. I am glad you mentioned her case. I really am.
She shouldn't have done her job as a public defender. She shouldn't have gotten that man a plea deal. Fuck her right?

Go ahead and read the report yourself. Turn to page 39 and read what she said about the girl. She didn't simply say the girl was "making it up". She used a child psychologist's help to determine the girl was emotionally unstable. She also had a tendency to seek out older men and fantasized about other people having attacked her body. The document itself shows the claim that "children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences." Hillary wanted the courts to order the girl undergo a psychiatric examination paid for by the defense. She shouldn't have laughed about parts of that case later, yes. But unless you think everyone is guilty until proven innocent, lawyers need to be able to defend (or at least work) in their client's best interest. If you see an issue with that, pray to God you never go to trial.
Internet War Criminal said:
Ah yes, DAS RAYCISS. The perennial cry of pansies on the left who can't live without witch hunts.
Click to expand...
Its about an intelligent rebuttal as "LOL CUCK" that the dipshits on the fringe right use. Well, when they're not muttering about those scurry furriners taking their jobs or reeeing about white "genocide"
 
  • Disagree
  • Agree
  • Dislike
Reactions: An Ounce of Vagina, *Asterisk*, Gym Leader Elesa and 5 others
Legatus Lanius said:
Oh no, the media is reporting what Trump said and did. We should sue them anytime they don't kiss his ass and treat him with kids gloves like in the primary election.
Yep, the media didn't say a word during the e-mail investigation, the Benghazi probes, the impeachment of Bill, or anything negative. There are no news articles about any of the DNC emails or any of these recent emails at all.
A statement she walked back and apologized for, yet you seem to think Trump's core would give a shit if he dropped the pretense and outright call blacks as Googles. Don't bullshit me. Trump only tried to court the black vote for like 2 weeks in August. You're delusional if you think Trump gives any more of a shit to blacks than Clinton.
No, Trump's not getting a free pass. Trump is getting exactly what he deserves. But when most of the damaging things the media has done has been to simply read back what he said, he has nobody to blame but himself. I am glad you mentioned her case. I really am.
She shouldn't have done her job as a public defender. She shouldn't have gotten that man a plea deal. Fuck her right?

Go ahead and read the report yourself. Turn to page 39 and read what she said about the girl. She didn't simply say the girl was "making it up". She used a child psychologist's help to determine the girl was emotionally unstable. She also had a tendency to seek out older men and fantasized about other people having attacked her body. The document itself shows the claim that "children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences." Hillary wanted the courts to order the girl undergo a psychiatric examination paid for by the defense. She shouldn't have laughed about parts of that case later, yes. But unless you think everyone is guilty until proven innocent, lawyers need to be able to defend (or at least work) in their client's best interest. If you see an issue with that, pray to God you never go to trial.

Its about an intelligent rebuttal as "LOL CUCK" that the dipshits on the fringe right use. Well, when they're not muttering about those scurry furriners taking their jobs or reeeing about white "genocide"
Click to expand...
I'm not seeing any reason in any of this to not vote for Trump.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: The Nameless One, vertexwindi, Gym Leader Elesa and 3 others
Very Honest Content said:
I was mentioning Regan because the purple sorcerer brought him up wistfully, but it is nice to know you're pining for just say no Nancy though, her legacy will always live on even if Scalia isn't anymore.
Click to expand...
You dumb fuck, I was saying that if Nancy Reagan was running for president I would be just as - if not more - critical of her husband's time in office, particularly given the role she played during it, than I am of the Clintons. How utterly retarded do you have to be to read what I said as 'pining' for Nancy?
Very Honest Content said:
My point is that Bill Clinton is not on the ticket so 'his' welfare reform that was passed with a majority of Republican votes and signed by him falls to the other side of the left/right paradigm this election when it comes time to lay it at some feet, as does DOMA
Click to expand...
You asked me what I had against Bill, claimed he was really popular and then claimed that the United States under his reign was a land of milk and honey. I explained why I don't like him, and I explained why I believe the first lady/husband and their previous record is important to the presidency. I even used the actions of former first lady, current presidential nominee Hillary Clinton to do it, but I guess that passed over your head.

I really like your 'he was just the president who passed those things, you can't hold him responsible!' argument though. I can just see him sitting in the oval office, his hand shaking as he desperately tries not to sign off on those bills, before his strength leaves him and, compelled by the power of the presidency, he signs them, tears streaming down his face in anguish. It's not like he could have vetoed them right? Oh wait, he said he supported DOMA and welfare reform was one of his campaign promises. Odd.
Very Honest Content said:
and if you think policing operations in those nations were something to be worried about you must really be climbing the walls over preemptive war in Iraq started by the guy Obama replaced and led to the rise of those ever so scary caliphate establishing assholes, huh?
Click to expand...
Yes, I was.
Legatus Lanius said:
Oh no, the media is reporting what Trump said and did. We should sue them anytime they don't kiss his ass and treat him with kids gloves like in the primary election.
Click to expand...
I like the way you deliberately cut out where I said that the media is exactly right to hold his feet to the flame.
Legatus Lanius said:
A statement she walked back and apologized for, yet you seem to think Trump's core would give a shit if he dropped the pretense and outright call blacks as Googles. Don't bullshit me. Trump only tried to court the black vote for like 2 weeks in August. You're delusional if you think Trump
Click to expand...
I don't think - in fact I can guarantee you, that I have at no point said Trump would be good for anyone, particularly not minorities. In fact I have said the exact opposite on multiple occasions, including at least once in reply to you.
Legatus Lanius said:
I am glad you mentioned her case. I really am.
She shouldn't have done her job as a public defender. She shouldn't have gotten that man a plea deal. Fuck her right?
Click to expand...
Wait for it...
Legatus Lanius said:
She shouldn't have laughed about parts of that case later, yes. But unless you think everyone is guilty until proven innocent, lawyers need to be able to defend (or at least work) in their client's best interest. If you see an issue with that, pray to God you never go to trial.
Click to expand...

'Oh I just can't stand the hypocrisy of Trump! Meanwhile I am apparently all on board a woman who claims to stand for women, who has proudly associated with people who claim voting against her would betray women, and yet has happily thrown countless women under the bus if they fell victim to her husband and laughed about her defense of a child rapist. And if you have a problem with her laughing about that, the only reason you could possibly have is because you want to abandon due process.

Boy am I glad you mentioned that she laughed about defending a child rapist, because I have a bunch of talking points prepared that perfectly refute something you never mentioned, that we should abandon due process, but have absolutely no bearing on the fact that she laughed about her defense of a child rapist. She shouldn't have done that, but I don't see any hypocrisy here, just like I don't see any hypocrisy in her trying to act like she cares about black people when she called black youths super predators or her campaign started the birther movement.'

The best part about these two posts is that both of you are absolutely convinced I must be a Trump supporter trying to slander Hillary so I can get daddy elected. You can't even fathom the concept of a liberal/leftist who would not want Hillary in office, so I must be a conservative worshipping at the Donald's feet. I'm probably a white nationalist too right? I did laugh at the pepe thing :o
 
  • Like
  • Dislike
  • Feels
Reactions: Takayuki Yagami, The Nameless One, Gym Leader Elesa and 5 others
Ineedahero said:
You dumb fuck, I was saying that if Nancy Reagan was running for president I would be just as - if not more - critical of her husband's time in office, particularly given the role she played during it, than I am of the Clintons. How utterly exceptional do you have to be to read what I said as 'pining' for Nancy?

You asked me what I had against Bill, claimed he was really popular and then claimed that the United States under his reign was a land of milk and honey. I explained why I don't like him, and I explained why I believe the first lady/husband and their previous record is important to the presidency. I even used the actions of former first lady, current presidential nominee Hillary Clinton to do it, but I guess that passed over your head.

I really like your 'he was just the president who passed those things, you can't hold him responsible!' argument though. I can just see him sitting in the oval office, his hand shaking as he desperately tries not to sign off on those bills, before his strength leaves him and, compelled by the power of the presidency, he signs them, tears streaming down his face in anguish. It's not like he could have vetoed them right? Oh wait, he said he supported DOMA and welfare reform was one of his campaign promises. Odd.

Yes, I was.

I like the way you deliberately cut out where I said, prophetically, that the media is exactly right to hold his feet to the flame.

I don't think - in fact I can guarantee you, that I have at no point said Trump would be good for anyone, particularly not minorities. In fact I have said the exact opposite on multiple occasions, including at least once in reply to you.

Wait for it...


'Oh I just can't stand the hypocrisy of Trump! Meanwhile I am apparently all on board a woman who claims to stand for women, who has proudly associated with people who claim voting against her would betray women, and yet has happily thrown countless women under the bus if they fell victim to her husband and laughed about her defense of a child rapist. And if you have a problem with her laughing about that, the only reason you could possibly have is because you want to abandon due process.

Boy am I glad you mentioned that she laughed about defending a child rapist, because I have a bunch of talking points prepared that perfectly refute something you never mentioned, that we should abandon due process, but have absolutely no bearing on the fact that she laughed about her defense of a child rapist. She shouldn't have done that, but I don't see any hypocrisy here, just like I don't see any hypocrisy in her trying to act like she cares about black people when she called black youths super predators or her campaign started the birther movement.'

The best part about these two posts is that both of you are absolutely convinced I must be a Trump supporter trying to slander Hillary so I can get daddy elected. You can't even fathom the concept of a liberal/leftist who would not want Hillary in office, so I must be a conservative worshipping at the Donald's feet. I'm probably a white nationalist too right? I did laugh at the pepe thing :o
Click to expand...

lol calm down
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Disagree
Reactions: Jacquetta, Chaosbandit, Gym Leader Elesa and 4 others
Internet War Criminal said:
She knew he was guilty she made that shit up about the little girl and accused her to be a slut going after older men even though she knew he had violently raped her

Then she laughed about it multiple times.


Stop defending that shit what is wrong with you
Click to expand...
She laughed at how aspects that were supposed to help the prosecutor helped the defense instead, like him passing a polygraph test. I don't hear her laughing about knowing he was guilty or fully intended to get a guilty guy off, considering he fucking took a plea deal.
A plea deal that the prosecutor OFFERED that would get him five years in jail on a lesser charge. Yet it was the judge who suspended four years and two months, not Clinton. Guess who also wanted a quick plea deal? The girl and her mother, who didn't want to put her daughter through testifying.
Plea bargins account accounted for (and still do) the majority of endings for charges of violent crime. Most of them never go to trial. And this was all before we had strict laws to protect rape victims. The girl would be given much better legal protection now than in the 70's.

I'm not defending anyone. Clinton had a job to do and she did the best she can. If that upsets you, the fact a constitutionally provided lawyer is supposed to defend their client, I suggest you climb down from your soapbox and start a movement to modify thr 6th ammendment.
Quit trying to tar anyone that doesn't worship Trump as some shill who'll defend child rape, then turn and cry when you get called a racist or deplorable.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: An Ounce of Vagina, *Asterisk*, Trombonista and 3 others
>1800 nuclear warheads

Trump. Trump pls. Stahp. Pls stahp.

Russia has roughly 7300 warheads. The US has roughly 7000. This is what we in the biz call 'Parity.

EDIT:

Clinton really did her homework here. She's absolutely right about the limited response window - which is why first strike is the only way to win a nuclear exchange, as it delays any attempted retaliatory strike by taking out early warning and command and control infrastructure along with various weapons.
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Lackadaisy, Jacquetta, An Ounce of Vagina and 4 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back